Abstract
Although it has been suggested that dietary energy intake restriction may be related to reduced BRCA-associated breast cancer (BC) risk, it is currently not known whether overall diet quality could predict the BC risk among women with deleterious mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA) genes who already have an elevated BC risk. To assess possible relationships between diet quality, reflected by the Alternate Healthy Eating Index (AHEI), the Diet Quality Index-Revised (DQI-R), the alternate Mediterranean Diet Index (aMED), the Canadian Healthy Eating Index (CHEI), and BRCA-associated BC risk, a case-control study was carried out within a cohort of 80 French-Canadian families with 250 members involving 89 carriers of BRCA genes affected by BC, 48 non-affected carriers and 46 non-affected non-carriers. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated in unconditional logistic regression models. After adjustment for age, physical activity and total energy intake, we did not detect any association between the AHEI or aMED and BC. However, a strong and significant inverse relationship was apparent between the DQI-R and CHEI and BRCA-associated BC risk. ORs comparing the highest and lowest tertiles of diet quality scores were 0.35 (95%CI = 0.12–1.02; p = 0.034 for trend) for the DQI-R and 0.18 (95%CI = 0.05–0.68; p = 0.006 for trend) for the CHEI, respectively. These inverse associations were not the result of a link with any specific component of the diet quality indexes. These results suggest that dietary guidelines reflected by the DQI-R and CHEI may constitute preventive strategies for reducing BRCA-associated BC risk.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Canadian Cancer Statistics. http://www.cancer.ca. Cited 2 June 2006
Antoniou AC, Pharoah PD, Narod S et al (2005) Breast and ovarian cancer risks to carriers of the BRCA1 5382insC and 185delAG and BRCA2 6174delT mutations: a combined analysis of 22 population based studies. J Med Genet 42:602–603
World Cancer Research Fund, American Institute for Cancer Research Fund, Nutrition and the Prevention of Cancer (1997) A global perspective. American Institute for Cancer Research, Washington, DC
Key TJ, Schatzkin A, Willett WC et al (2004) Diet, nutrition and the prevention of cancer. Public Health Nutr 7:187–200
Nkondjock A, Robidoux A, Paredes Y et al (2006) Diet, lifestyle and BRCA-related breast cancer risk among French-Canadians. Breast Cancer Res Treat 98:285–294
Haines PS, Siega-Riz AM, Popkin BM (1999) The Diet Quality Index revised: a measurement instrument for populations. J Am Diet Assoc 99:697–704
McCullough ML, Feskanich D, Stampfer MJ et al (2002) Diet quality and major chronic disease risk in men and women: moving toward improved dietary guidance. Am J Clin Nutr 76:1261–1271
Trichopoulou A, Costacou T, Bamia C et al (2003) Adherence to a Mediterranean diet and survival in a Greek population. N Engl J Med 348:2599–2608
Newby PK, Hu FB, Rimm EB et al (2003) Reproducibility and validity of the Diet Quality Index Revised as assessed by use of a food-frequency questionnaire. Am J Clin Nutr 78:941–949
Fung TT, McCullough ML, Newby PK et al (2005) Diet-quality scores and plasma concentrations of markers of inflammation and endothelial dysfunction. Am J Clin Nutr 82:163–173
Fung TT, Hu FB, McCullough ML et al (2006) Diet quality is associated with the risk of estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer in postmenopausal women. J Nutr 136:466–472
Tonin PN, Perret C, Lambert JA et al (2001) Founder BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in early-onset French Canadian breast cancer cases unselected for family history. Int J Cancer 95:189–193
Aretini P, D’Andrea E, Pasini B et al (2003) Different expressivity of BRCA1 and BRCA2: analysis of 179 Italian pedigrees with identified mutation. Breast Cancer Res Treat 81:71–79
Tonin PM, Mes-Masson AM, Narod SA et al (1999) Founder BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in French Canadian ovarian cancer cases unselected for history family. Clin Genet 55:318–324
Jain M, Howe GR, Rohan T (1996) Dietary assessment in epidemiology: comparison on food frequency and a diet history questionnaire with a 7-day food record. Am J Epidemiol 143:953–960
Jain M, Miller AB, To T (1994) Premorbid diet and the prognosis of women with breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 86:1390–1397
Ghadirian P, Jain M, Ducic S et al (1998) Nutritional factors in the aetiology of multiple sclerosis: a case-control study in Montreal, Canada. Int J Epidemiol 27:845–852
US Department of Agriculture (1992) Food guide pyramid: a guide to daily food choices. US Department of Agriculture, Human Nutrition Information Service, Home and Garden Bulletin No. 232, Washington, DC
US Department of Agriculture and US Department of Health and Human Services (1995) Nutrition and your health: dietary guidelines for Americans; 5th ed. US Departments of Agriculture and Health and Human Services, Home and Garden Bulletin No. 252, Washington, DC
Canada’s Food Guide to Healthy Eating. http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/fn-an/food-guide-aliments/ Cited 24 May 2006
Wayne SJ, Baumgartner K, Baumgartner RN et al (2006) Diet quality is directly associated with quality of life in breast cancer survivors. Breast Cancer Res Treat 96:227–232
Tangney CC, Young JA, Murtaugh MA et al (2002) Self-reported dietary habits, overall dietary quality and symptomatology of breast cancer survivors: a cross-sectional examination. Breast Cancer Res Treat 71:113–123
Petri AL, Tjonneland A, Gamborg M et al (2004) Alcohol intake, type of beverage, and risk of breast cancer in pre- and postmenopausal women. Clin Exp Res 28:1084–1090
Singletary KW, Gapstur SM (2001) Alcohol and breast cancer: review of epidemiologic and experimental evidence and potential mechanisms. JAMA 286:2143–2151
Dumitrescu RG, Shields PG (2005) The etiology of alcohol-induced breast cancer. Alcohol 35:213–225
Acknowledgements
Dr. André Nkondjock is a Research Fellow supported by the Canadian Cancer Society through an award from the National Cancer Institute of Canada (CCERN). This study was supported in part by the Canadian Cancer Etiology Research Network (CCERN).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
Diet quality index scoring criteria
Index | Dietary components | Foods included | Criteria | Score |
---|---|---|---|---|
AHEI | Vegetables and fruits | All vegetables except potatoes, all fruits and fruit juices | ≥8 servings/d | 10; 1 point less for each 10% less than the required intake for a full score |
Nuts and soy | Nuts, tofu and soymilk | 1 serving/d | Same as above | |
Ratio of white to red meat | White (chicken, seafood) and red (read and processed meats) | 4 | Same as above | |
Cereal fiber | 15 g/d | Same as above | ||
Trans fatty acids | All foods supplying trans fat | ≤0.5% of total energy | 10 | |
0.5 and <4% of total energy | 1 point less for each 10% increment | |||
≥4% of total energy | 0 | |||
Ratio of PUFAS to SFAs | ≥1 | 10; 1 point less for each 10% less than the required intake for a full score | ||
Multivitamin use | ≥5 years | 7.5 points for ≥ 5 years regular use and 2.5 points for all others | ||
Alcohol | Beer, wine, whiskey and spirits | 0.5–1.5 serving/d | 10; 1 point less for each 10% less or above than the required range intake for a full score | |
DQI-R | Grains | All grains, breads and grain products | ≥9 servings/d | 10; 1 point less for each 10% less than the required intake for a full score |
Vegetables and fruits | All vegetables, fruits and juices | ≥7 servings/d | Same as above | |
Total fat | All foods supplying fat | ≤30% of total energy | 10 | |
30.1–40% of total energy | 5 | |||
>40% of total energy | 0 | |||
SFAs | All foods supplying SFAs | ≤10% of total energy | 10 | |
10.1–13% of total energy | 5 | |||
>13% of total energy | 0 | |||
Cholesterol | All foods supplying cholesterol | ≤300 mg | 10 | |
301–400 mg | 5 | |||
>400 mg | 0 | |||
Calcium | All foods supplying calcium | ≥1200 mg | 10; 1 point less for each 10% less than the required intake for a full score | |
Iron | All foods supplying iron | ≥8 mg | Same as above | |
Diet diversity | Sum of the following four food groups: grain products, vegetables and fruits, milk products, meats and alternatives | ≥0.25 serving/d of each food included in a food group = 1 point | Maximum of 2.5 points for each food group; maximum of 10 for total diversity | |
Diet moderation | Added fat | <25 g/d | 2.5 | |
25.1–50 g/d | 1.5 | |||
50.1–75 g/d | 1 | |||
>75 g/d | 0 | |||
Added sugar | ≤12 tsp/d | 2.5 | ||
12.1–18 tsp/d | 1.5 | |||
18.1–24 tsp/d | 1 | |||
>24 tsp/d | 0 | |||
Sodium | ≤2400 mg | 2.5 | ||
2401–3400 mg | 1.5 | |||
>3400 mg | 0 | |||
Alcohol | ≤1 drink/d | 2.5 | ||
1.01–1.5 drink/d | 1.5 | |||
>1.5 drink/d | 0 | |||
AMED | Vegetables and fruits | All vegetables (except potatoes), fruits and juices | 1 point if number of serving/d > median intake of control groups; 0 point if this criterion is not met | |
Legumes | Beans, peas and tofu | Same as above | ||
Nuts | Nuts and peanut butter | Same as above | ||
Whole grains | Whole-grain ready-to-eat cereals, whole bread, wheat germ | Same as above | ||
Red and processed meats | Beef, pork, hamburger, bacon, hot dogs | Same as above | ||
Fish | Fish and seafood | Same as above | ||
Ratio of Mono Unsaturated Fatty Acids (MUFAs) to SFAs | 1 point if value > median value of control groups; 0 point if this criterion is not met | |||
Ethanol | Beer, wine, whiskey and spirits | 5–25 g/d | 1 | |
<5 or >25 g/d | 0 | |||
CHEI | Grains products | All grains, breads and grain and enriched products | ≥9 servings/d | 10; 1 point less for each 10% less than required intake for full score |
Vegetables and fruits | All vegetables, fruits and juices | ≥8 servings/d | Same as above | |
Milk products | Whole and low-fat milk, cheese, yogurt, cream, ice-cream | 2–4 servings/d | 10; 1 point less for each 10% less or above than the required range intake for a full score | |
Meats and alternatives | Meats, poultry, fish, peas, beans and lentils | 2–3 servings/d | Same as above |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nkondjock, A., Ghadirian, P. Diet quality and BRCA-associated breast cancer risk. Breast Cancer Res Treat 103, 361–369 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-006-9371-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-006-9371-0