Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The Biology of Invasions: The Genetic Adaptation Paradox

  • Perspectives and Paradigms
  • Published:
Biological Invasions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One of the most relevant topics in the biology of invasion concerns the genetic changes that occur subsequent to a species invasion, an issue of particular focus among conservation biologists. Colonizing a novel environment presents a genetic challenge to invading species because such species surely have not experienced the selective pressures presented by the environment. Here we ask, by what mechanisms and processes do alien species genetically naïve to their new environment, become successful invaders? We attempt to resolve this paradox by considering the interplay between an invader’s ability to modify its new environment, and genetic modifications imposed by the new environment. We postulate that epigenetic adaptations, and adaptive mutations are likely play a role in enhancing invasion success.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aguilera L and Carvajal J (1976). La ictiofauna del complejo hidrográfico Río Manzanares Edo. Sucre. Venezuela. Lagena. 37–38: 23–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen MF, Swenson W, Querejeta JI, Egerton-Warburton LM and Treseder KK (2003). Ecology of micorrhizae: a conceptual framework for complex interactions among plants and fungi. Annual Review of Phytopatology 41: 271–303

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Alceste CC and Jory DE (2000). Considerations for tilapia production in salt water. Aquaculture Magazine 26(5): 58–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Allendorf FW and Lundquist LL (2003). Introduction: population biology, evolution and control of invasive species. Conservation Biology 17: 24–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bachelet G, Simon-Bouhet B, Desclaux C, García-Meunier P, Mairesse G, Montaudouin X, Raigné H, Randriabao K, Saurian PG and Viard F (2004). Invasion of the eastern Bay of Biscay by the nassariid gastropod Cyclope neritae: origin and effects on resident fauna. Marine Ecology Progress Series 276: 147–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjedov I, Tenaillon O, Gerard B, Souza V, Denamur E, Radma M, Taddei F and Matic I (2003). Stresss-induced mutagenesis in bacteria. Science 300: 1382–1383

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cairns J and Foster PL (1991). Adaptive reversion of a frameshift mutation in Escherichia coli. Genetics 128: 695–701

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Callaway RM, Thelen GC, Rodriguez A and Holben WE (2004). Soil biota and exotic plant invasion. Nature 427: 731–733

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chang AL, Crookss JA and Ruiz GM (2003) Differing responses of native and exotic species to increasing pollution in an estuarine fouling community. International Conference on Marine Bioinvasions. Scripps Institution of Oceanoghraphy, La Jolla, California, USA. Abstract Book: 19.

  • Costa-Pierce BA (2003). Rapid evolution of an established feral tilapia (Oreochromis spp.): the need to incorporate invasion science into regulatory structures. Biological Invasions 5: 71–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denver DR, Morris K, Lynch M and Thomas WK (2004). High mutation rate and predominance of insertions in the Caenorhabditis elegans nuclear genome. Nature 430: 679–682

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elena SF and Lenski RE (2003). Evolution experiments with microorganisms: the dynamics and genetic bases of adaptation. Nature Reviews Genetics 4: 457–469

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher RA (1930). The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorshkov VG, Makarieva AM and Gorshkov VV (2004). Revising the fundamentals of ecological knowledge: the biota-environment interaction. Ecological Complexity 1: 17–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hastings PJ, Slack A, Petrosino JF and Rosenberg SM (2004). Adaptive gene amplification and point mutation are independent mechanisms of genetic change: Evidence for various stress-inducible mutation mechanisms. PloS Biology 2(12): e399

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ho M-W (2004). Death of the central dogma. Science in Society 24: 4–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Kardong KV (2003). Epigenomis: the new science of functional and evolutionary morphology. Animal Biology 53: 225–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klironomos JN (2002). Feed back with soil biota contributes to plant rarity and invasive in communities. Nature 417: 32–33

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Makarieva AM, Gorshkov VG and Li BL (2004). Body size, energy consumption and allometric scaling: a new dimension in the diversity-stability debate. Ecological Complexity 1: 139–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKay JK and Latta RG (2002). Adaptive population divergence: markers, QTL and traits. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17: 285–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merola M (1994). Reassessment of homozygosity and the case for inbreeding depression in the cheetah, Acinonyx jubatus: Implications for conservation. Conservation Biology 8: 961–971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell CE and Power AG (2003). Release of invasive plants from fungal and viral pathogens. Nature 421: 625–627

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy SM (2004). Enemy-free space maintains swallowtail butterfly host shift. PNAS 101: 18048–18052

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez JE, Alfonsi C, Nirchio M, Muñoz C and Gómez JA (2003a). The Introduction of exotic species in aquaculture: a solution or part of the problem. Interciencia 28: 234–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Pérez JE, Salazar S, Alfonsi C and y Ruiz L (2003b). Ictiofauna del Río Manzanares: A cuatro décadas de la introducción de Oreochromis mossambicus. Boletino del Instituto Oceanografico. Universidad de Oriente 42: 29–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Pérez JE, Muñoz C, Huaquin L and Nirchio M (2004). Riesgos de la introducción de tilapias (Oreochromis sp.) (Perciformes: Cichlidae) en ecosistemas acuáticos de Chile. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 77: 195–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel D, Lach L, Zuniga R and Morrison D (2000). Environmental and economic cost of nonindigenous species in the United States. BioSciences 50: 53–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prenter J, MacNeil C, Dick JTA and Dunn AM (2004). Roles of parasites in animal invasions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19: 385–390

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ricciardi A and Atkinson SK (2004). Distinctiveness magnifies the impact of biological invaders in aquatic ecosystems. Ecology Letters 7: 781–784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg SM (2001). Evolving responsively: adaptive mutation. Nature Reviews Genetics 2: 504–515

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg SM and Hastings PJ (2003). Modulating mutation rates in the wild. Science 300: 1382–1383

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg SM and Hastings PJ (2004). Worming into genetic instability. Nature 430: 625–626

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sakai AK, Allendorf FW, Holt JS, Lodge DM, Molofsky J, With KA, Baughman S, Cabin RJ, Cohen JE, Ellstrand NC, McCauley DE, O‘Neil P, Parker IM, Thomson JN and Weller SG (2001). The population biology of invasive species. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 32: 305–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiassny LJ and Meyer A (1999). Cíclidos de los lagos de Africa Oriental. Investigación y Ciencia 271: 22–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddington CH (1953). Genetic assimilation of an acquire character. Evolution 7: 118–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe WO, Olla BL, Wicklund RI and Head WD (1997). Salt water culture of the Florida red tilapia and other saline-tolerant tilapias: Review. In: Costa-Pierce, BA and Rakocy, JE (eds) Tilapia Aquaculture in the Americas, World Aquaculture Society, Baton Rouge, Lousiana, USA 55–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Witting L (2002). Two contrasting interpretations of Fisher‘s fundamental theorem of natural selection. Theoretical Biology 7: 1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng ZB (2005). QTL mapping and the genetic basis of adaptation: recent developments. Genetica 123: 25–37

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Instituto Oceanográfico de Venezuela, Universidad de Oriente, Cumaná, Venezuela

    Julio E. Pérez & Carmen Alfonsi

  2. Escuela de Ciencias Aplicadas del Mar, Universidad de Oriente, Nueva Esparta, Venezuela

    Mauro Nirchio

  3. Departamento de Ciencias del Mar, Universidad Arturo Prat, Iquique, Chile

    Carlos Muñoz

Authors
  1. Julio E. Pérez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mauro Nirchio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Carmen Alfonsi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Carlos Muñoz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julio E. Pérez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pérez, J.E., Nirchio, M., Alfonsi, C. et al. The Biology of Invasions: The Genetic Adaptation Paradox. Biol Invasions 8, 1115–1121 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-005-8281-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-005-8281-0

Key words

Search

Navigation