Abstract
We analyzed the luminosity-temperature-mass of gas (L X −T−M g ) relations for a sample of 21 Chandra galaxy clusters. We used the standard approach (β−model) to evaluate these relations for our sample that differs from other catalogues since it considers galaxy clusters at higher redshifts (0.4<z<1.4). We assumed power-law relations in the form \(L_{X} \sim(1 +z)^{A_{L_{X}T}} T^{\beta_{L_{X}T}}\), \(M_{g} \sim(1 + z)^{A_{M_{g}T}} T^{\beta_{M_{g}T}}\), and \(M_{g} \sim(1 + z)^{A_{M_{g}L_{X}}} L^{\beta_{M_{g}L_{X}}}\). We obtained the following fitting parameters with 68 % confidence level: \(A_{L_{X}T} = 1.50 \pm0.23\), \(\beta_{L_{X}T} = 2.55 \pm0.07\); \(A_{M_{g}T} = -0.58 \pm0.13\) and \(\beta_{M_{g}T} = 1.77 \pm0.16\); \(A_{M_{g}L_{X}} \approx-1.86 \pm0.34\) and \(\beta_{M_{g}L_{X}} = 0.73 \pm0.15\), respectively. We found that the evolution of the M g −T relation is small, while the M g −L X relation is strong for the cosmological parameters Ω m =0.27 and Ω Λ =0.73. In overall, the clusters at high-z have stronger dependencies between L X −T−M g correlations, than those for clusters at low-z. For most of galaxy clusters (first of all, from MACS and RCS surveys) these results are obtained for the first time.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
R 200 is the radius within which the mean halo density is 200 times the critical density.
MEKAL is the model which describes the emission from hot diffuse plasma (ICM), and WABS models the photo-electric absorption (values taken from Dickey and Lockman 1990).
DSDEPROJ source code is available at www.xray.ast.cam.ac.uk/papers/dsdeproj.
References
Afshordi, N., Cen, R.: Astrophys. J. 564, 669 (2002)
Allen, S.W., et al.: Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 335, 256 (2002)
Andreon, S., et al.: Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 412, 2391 (2011)
Apunevych, S., et al.: Kinemat. Phys. Celest. Bodies 25, 55 (2009)
Arnaud, K.A.: In: Jacoby, G.H., Barnes, J. (eds.) Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V. Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, XSPEC: The First Ten Years, vol. 101 (1996). p. 17
Arnaud, K.A., et al.: Astron. Astrophys. 389, 1 (2002)
Babyk, Iu.: Bull. Crimean Astrophys. Obs. 108, 87 (2012a)
Babyk, Iu.: J. Phys. Stud. 16, 7 (2012b)
Babyk, Iu., Vavilova, I.: Odessa Astron. Publ. 25, 199 (2012)
Babyk, Iu., et al.: Kinemat. Phys. Celest. Bodies 28, 69 (2012a)
Babyk, Iu., et al.: AASP 2, 56 (2012b)
Babyk, Iu., et al.: arxiv:1208.2424 (2012c)
Borgani, S., et al.: Astrophys. J. 517, 40 (1999)
Borgani, S., et al.: Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 348, 1078 (2004)
Bryan, G., Norman, M.: Astrophys. J. 495, 80 (1998)
Cavaliere, A., Fusco-Femiano, R.: Astron. Astrophys. 49, 137 (1976)
Cavaliere, A., et al.: Astrophys. J. 484, 21 (1997)
Cavaliere, A., et al.: Astrophys. J. 501, 493 (1998)
Cavaliere, A., et al.: Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 308, 599 (1999)
David, L., et al.: Astrophys. J. 412, 479 (1993)
Del Popolo, A.: Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 408, 1808 (2010)
Del Popolo, A.: Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 424, 38 (2012)
Del Popolo, A., et al.: Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 336, 81 (2002)
Del Popolo, A., et al.: Astrophys. J. 628, 76 (2005)
Dickey, J., Lockman, F.: Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 28, 215 (1990)
Donahue, M., et al.: Astrophys. J. 527, 525 (1999)
Ettori, S., Fabian, A.: Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 305, 834 (1999)
Ettori, S., Fabian, A.: Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 317, 57 (2000)
Fairley, B., et al.: Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 315, 669 (2000)
Ferramacho, L., et al.: Astron. Astrophys. 463, 423 (2007)
Finoguenov, A., et al.: Astron. Astrophys. 368, 749 (2001)
Finoguenov, A., et al.: Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 374, 737 (2007)
Henry, J., et al.: Astrophys. J. 432, 49 (1994)
Holden, B., et al.: Astron. J. 124, 33 (2002)
Horner, D., et al.: Astrophys. J. 520, 78 (1999)
Jones, C., et al.: Astrophys. J. 276, 38 (1984)
Kaastra, J., et al.: Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. Ser. 97, 443 (1993)
Kotov, O., Vikhlinin, A.: Astrophys. J. 641, 752 (2005)
Liedahl, D., et al.: Astrophys. J. 438, 115 (1995)
Markevitch, M.: Astrophys. J. 504, 27 (1998)
Markevitch, M., et al.: Astrophys. J. 541, 542 (2000)
Metzler, C., Evrard, A.: arXiv:astro-ph/9710324 (1997)
Mushotzky, R., et al.: Astrophys. J. 482, 13 (1997)
Mushotzky, R., et al.: Nature 404, 459 (2000)
Nevalainen, J., et al.: Astrophys. J. 532, 694 (2000)
Norman, M., et al.: astro-ph/1005.1100 (2010)
Novicki, M., et al.: Astron. J. 124, 2413 (2002)
Novosyadlyj, B.: J. Phys. Stud. 11, 226 (2007)
Reichart, D., et al.: Astrophys. J. 516, 1 (1999)
Roncarelli, M., et al.: Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 373, 1339 (2006)
Russell, H., et al.: Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 390, 1207 (2008)
Sanders, J., et al.: Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 381, 1381 (2007)
Voit, G., et al.: Nature 414, 425 (2001)
Yatskiv, Ya.S., et al.: General Relativity Theory: Tests through Time (2005). ISBN 966-02-3728-6
Acknowledgements
We thank anonymous referee for useful corrections. We thank all the staff members involved in the Chandra project. The HEASARC online data archive at NASA/GSFC has been used extensively in this research. This research is partially supported in frame of the Target Program of Space Science Research of the NAS of Ukraine (2012–2016). Authors thank Dr. Francesco Pace for his useful remarks.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Babyk, I., Vavilova, I. The Chandra X-ray galaxy clusters at z<1.4: constraints on the evolution of L X −T−M g relations. Astrophys Space Sci 349, 415–421 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-013-1630-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-013-1630-z