Skip to main content
Log in

The Effects of Work Stressors, Perceived Organizational Support, and Gender on Work-Family Conflict in Hong Kong

  • Published:
Asia Pacific Journal of Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examined the direct and moderating effects of perceived organizational support (POS) and gender on the relationship between work stressors and work-family conflict for a sample of Hong Kong Chinese employees. As predicted, we found that POS is negatively related to both FWC (family-to-work conflict) and WFC (work-to-family conflict), and that work stressors (including role ambiguity, role conflict, and role overload) are positively related to FWC and WFC. Additionally, the positive relationship between role overload and WFC was found to be weaker when POS was high, suggesting that POS can offset the adverse impact of role overload.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Allen, T. D. 2001. Family-supportive work environments: The role of organizational perceptions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58: 414–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aryee, S., Fields, D., & Luk, V. 1999. A cross-cultural test of a model of the work-family interface. Journal of Management, 25: 491–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Aryee, S., & Luk, V. 1996. Balancing two major parts of adult life experiences: Work and family identity among dual-earner couples. Human Relations,49: 465–487.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Aryee, S., Luk, V., Leung, A., & Lo, S. 1999. Role stressors, work-family conflict and well-being: The moderating influence of spouse support and coping behaviors among employed parents in Hong Kong. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 54: 259–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Aryee, S., Luk, V., & Stone, R. 1998. Family-responsive variables and retention-relevant outcomes among employed parents. Human Relations, 51: 73–87.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Aryee, S., Srinivas, E. S., & Tan, H. H. 2005. Rhythms of life: Antecedents and outcomes of work-family balance in employed parents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90: 132–146.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. 1986. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51: 1173–1182.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Beehr, T. A., Walsh, J. T., & Taber, T. D. 1976. Relationship of stress to individually and organizationally valued states: Higher order needs as a moderator. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61: 41–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Brislin, R.W. 1970. Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1: 185–216.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Casper, W. J., Martin, J. A., Buffardi, L. C., & Erdwins, C. J. 2002. Work-family conflict, perceived organizational support, and organizational commitment among employed mothers. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 7: 99–108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Census and Statistics Department. 2002. 2001 Population Census Main Report. Hong Kong: Hong Kong SAR Government.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chiu, W., & Ng, C. 1999. Women-friendly HRM and organizational commitment: A study among women and men of organizations in Hong Kong. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72: 485–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Choi, J., & Chen, C. C. 2003. The role of gender in the life stress of Chinese employees: Women tired from housework and men tired from work. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Seattle.

  14. deLeon, C. T., & Ho, S. 1994. The third identity of modern Chinese women: Women managers in Hong Kong. In N. J. Adler and D. N. Izraeli (Eds.), Competitive frontiers: Women managers in a global economy: 43–56. Cambridge: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Duxbury, L., & Higgins, C. 1991. Gender differences in work-family conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76: 60–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Duxbury, L., Higgins, C., & Lee, C. 1994. Work-family conflict: A comparison by Gender, family type, and perceived control. Journal of Family Issues, 15: 449–466.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ebrahimi, B. P. 1999. Managerial motivation and gender roles: A study of males and females in Hong Kong. Women in Management Review, 14: 44–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Eby, L. T., Casper, W. J., Lockwood, A., Bordeaux, C., & Brinley, A. 2005. Work and family research in IO/OB: Content analysis and review of the literature (1980–2002). Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66: 124–197.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Edwards, J. R., & Rothbard, N. P. 2000. Mechanisms linking work and family: Clarifying the relationship between work and family constructs. Academy of Management Review,25: 178–199.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. 1986. Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71: 500–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Erdwins, C. J., Buffardi, L.C., Casper, W. J., & O’Brien, A. S. 2001. The relationship of women’s role strain to social support, role satisfaction, and self-efficacy. Family Relations: Interdisciplinary Journal of Applied Family Studies, 50: 230–238.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Frone, M. R. 2000. Work-family conflict and employee psychiatric disorders: The National comorbidity survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85: 888–895.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Frone, M. R. 2003. Work-family balance. In J. C. Quick and L. E. Tetrick (Eds.), Handbook of occupational health psychology:143-162. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

  24. Frone, M. R., Russell, M., & Cooper, M. L. 1992a. Antecedents and outcomes of work-family conflict: Testing a model of the work-family interface. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77: 65–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Frone, M. R., Russell, M., & Cooper, M. L. 1992b. Prevalence of work-family conflict: Are work and family boundaries asymmetrically permeable? Journal of Organizational Behavior,13: 723–729.

  26. Fu, C. K., & Shaffer, M. A. 2001. The tug of work and family: Direct and indirect domain-specific determinants of work-family conflict. Personnel Review, 30: 502–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gerson, K., & Jacobs, J. A. 2001. Changing the structure and culture of work. In R. Hertz and N. L. Marshall (Eds.), Working families: The transformation of the American home:207–226. Berkeley, CA: The University of California Press.

  28. Grant-Vallone, E. J., & Ensher, E. A. 2001. An examination of work and personal life conflict, organizational support, and employee health among international expatriates. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 25: 261–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Greenhaus, J. H., & Beutell, N. J. 1985. Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of Management Review, 10: 76–88.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Greenhaus, J. H., & Parasuraman, S. 1994. Work-family conflict, social support, and well-being. In M. J. Davidson and R. J. Burke (Eds.), Women in management: Current research issues: 213–229. London: Paul Chapman.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Greenhaus, J. H., & Parasuraman, S. 1999. Research on work, family, and gender: Current status and future directions. In G. N. Powell (Ed.), Handbook of gender and work: 391–412. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

  32. Gutek, B. A., Searle, S., & Klepa, L. 1991. Rational versus gender role explanations for work-family conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76: 560–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Hill, E. J., Yang, C., Hawkins, A. J., & Ferris, M. 2004. A cross-cultural test of the work-family interface in one corporation in 48 countries. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 66: 1300–1316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Howard, A. 1992. Work and family crossroads spanning the career. In S. Zedeck (Ed.), Work, families, and organizations: 70–137. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

  35. Jones, A. P., & Butler, M. C. 1980. A role transition approach to the stressors of organizationally induced family role disruption. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 42: 367–376.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Joplin, J. R., Francesco, A. M., Shaffer, M. A., & Lau, T. 2003. The macro-environment and work-family conflict: Development of a cross-cultural comparative framework. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 3: 305–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kessler, R. C. 1979. Stress, social status, and psychological distress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 20: 259–272.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Kinnunen, U., & Mauno, S. 1998. Antecedents and outcomes of work-family conflict among employed women and men in Finland. Human Relations, 51: 157–177.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Kopelman, R. E., Greenhaus, J. H., & Connolly, T. F. 1983. A model of work, family, and interrole conflict: A construct validation study. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 32: 198–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Lo, S. 2003. Perceptions of family-work conflict among female married professionals in Hong Kong. Personnel Review, 32: 376–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Lo, S., Stone, R. J., & Ng, W. 2003. Work-family conflict and coping strategies adopted by female married professionals in Hong Kong. Women in Management Review, 18: 182–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Lo, S., Wright, P., & Wright, R. 2003. Job-family satisfaction and work-family conflict among female married professional in Hong Kong: A dichotomy of attitude and outlook. International Journal of Employment Studies, 11: 25–45.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Ling, Y., & Powell, G. N. 2001. Work-family conflict in contemporary China: Beyond an American-based model. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 1: 357–373.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Major, B. 1994. From social inequality to personal entitlement: The role of social comparisons, legitimacy appraisals, and group membership. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 26:293–355. NY: Academic Press.

  45. Moideenkutty, U., Blau, G., Kumar, R., & Nalakath, A. 2001. Perceived organizational support as a mediator of the relationship of perceived situational factors to affective organizational commitment. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 50: 615–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Ng, C.W., & Chiu, W. 1997. Women-friendly HRM good for QWL? The case of Hong Kong based companies. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 8: 644–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Ngo, H.Y. 1992. Employment status of married women in Hong Kong. Sociological Perspectives, 35: 281–315.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Ngo, H. Y., & Lau, C. M. 1998. Interference between work and family among male and female executives in Hong Kong. Research and Practice in Human Resource Management, 6: 17–34.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Ngo, H. Y., & Lui, S. 1999. Gender differences in outcomes of work-family conflict: The case of Hong Kong managers. Sociological Focus, 33, 303–316.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Ngo, H. Y., & Tsang, A. 1998. Employment practices and organizational commitment: Differential effects for men and women? International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 6: 251–266.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Rizzo, J. R., House, R. J., & Lirtzman, S. I. 1970. Role conflict and ambiguity in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 15: 150–163.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Singh, R., Greenhaus, J. H., & Parasuraman, S. 2002. The impact of family life on career decisions and outcomes. In C. L. Cooper and R. J. Burke (Eds.), The new world of work: Challenges and opportunities: 95–112. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Sirianni, C., & Negrey, C. 2000. Working time as gendered time. Feminist Economics, 6: 59–76.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Simon, R. W. 1995. Gender, multiple roles, role meaning, and mental health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 36: 182–194.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Stamper, C. L., & Johlke, M. C. 2003. The impact of perceived organizational support on the relationship between boundary spanner role stress and work outcomes. Journal of Management, 29: 569–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Stoeva, A. Z., Chiu, R. K., & Greenhaus, J. H. 2002. Negative affectivity, role stress, and work-family conflict. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 60: 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Thomas, L. T., & Ganster, D. C. 1995. Impact of family-supportive work variables on work-family conflict and strain: A control perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80: 6–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Thompson, C. A., Beauvais, L. L., & Lyness, K. S. 1999. When work-family benefits are not enough: The influence of work-family culture on benefit utilization, organizational attachment, and work-family conflict. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 54: 392–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Voydanoff, P. 1989. Work and family: A review and expanded conceptualization. In E. B. Goldsmith (Ed.), Work and family: Theory, research, and applications: 1–22. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

  60. Westman, M. 2005. Cross-cultural differences in crossover research. In S. Poelmans (Ed.), Work and family: An international research perspective: 241–260. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

  61. Williams, J. 2000. Unbending gender: Why family and work conflict and what to do about it. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sharon Foley.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Foley, S., Hang-yue, N. & Lui, S. The Effects of Work Stressors, Perceived Organizational Support, and Gender on Work-Family Conflict in Hong Kong. Asia Pacific J Manage 22, 237–256 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-005-3568-3

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-005-3568-3

Navigation