Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Agreement of Daily Diary and Retrospective Measures of Condom Use

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
AIDS and Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study compares condom use reported two ways. 251 heterosexual participants (63% female) reported condom use on a prospective daily diary and on a retrospective questionnaire. Proportion of condom use with vaginal sex was calculated from the diary data and contrasted with retrospective categories. Responses were consistent for some participants, especially those who used condoms never or always, but responses from others showed considerable variability. Participants with few sexual encounters were more likely than those with more encounters to use “never” and “every time” endpoints. The results call into question the way participants interpret the meaning of retrospective categories.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. There were equal numbers of participants in the three recall conditions. Fewer participants in the one week condition appear in this analysis because many had not had sex in the one week previous to completing the retrospective questionnaire.

References

  • Armstrong, B. K., White, E., & Saracci, R. (1992). Principles of exposure measurement in epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catania, J. A., Gibson, D. R., Chitwood, D. D., & Coates, T. J. (1990). Methodological problems in AIDS behavioral research: Influences on measurement error and participation bias in studies of sexual behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 339–362.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cecil, H., & Zimet, G. D. (1998). Meaning assigned by undergraduates to frequency statements of condom use. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 27(5), 493–505.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gillmore, M. R. et al. (2001). Daily data collection of sexual and other health-related behaviors. Journal of Sex Research, 38(1), 35–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillmore, M. R. et al. (2002). Does “high = high risk”? An event-based analysis of the relationship between substance use and unprotected anal sex among gay and bisexual men. AIDS and Behavior, 6(4), 361–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giovanucci, E. et al. (1991). The assessment of alcohol consumption by a simple self-administered questionnaire. American Journal of Epidemiology, 133, 810–817.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, C. A., Catania, J., Brand, R., Duong, T., & Canchola, J. (2003). Recalling sexual behavior: A methodological analysis of memory recall bias via interview using the diary as the gold standard. Journal of Sex Research, 40(4), 325–332.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jaccard, J., Wan, C. K., Dittus, P., & Quinlan, S. (2002). The accuracy of self-reports of condom use and sexual behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(9), 1863–1905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, D. M. et al. (2003). Adolescent drinking and sex: Findings from a daily diary study. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 35(4), 162–168.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pietinen, P. et al. (1988). Reproducibility and validity of dietary assessment instruments. I. A self-administered food use questionnaire with a portion size picture booklet. American Journal of Epidemiology, 128, 655–666.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schroder, K. E. E., Carey, M. P., & Vanable, P. A. (2003). Methodological challenges in research on sexual risk behavior: II. Accuracy of self-reports. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 26(2), 104–123.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, N. (1990). Assessing frequency reports of mundane behaviors: Contributions of cognitive psychology to questionnaire construction. In C. Hendrick & M. S. Clark (Eds.), Research methods in personality and social psychology (pp. 98–119). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheeran, P., & Abraham, C. (1994). Measurement of condom use in 72 studies of HIV-preventive behaviour: A critical review. Patient Education and Counseling, 24, 199–216.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, A. A. et al. (2003). Intensive momentary reporting of pain with an electronic diary: reactivity, compliance, and patient satisfaction. Pain, 104(1–2), 343–351.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, D. L., & Diener, E. (1990). Memory accuracy in the recall of emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 291–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weir, S. S., Roddy, R. E., Zekeng, L., & Ryan, K. A. (1999). Association between condom use and HIV infection: A randomised study of self reported condom use measures. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 53(7), 417–422.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zenilman, J. M. et al. (1995). Condom use to prevent incident STDs: The validity of self-reported condom use. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 22(1), 15–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barbara C. Leigh.

Additional information

Supported by AA013688, AA000183 from the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hoppe, M.J., Morrison, D.M., Gillmore, M.R. et al. Agreement of Daily Diary and Retrospective Measures of Condom Use. AIDS Behav 12, 113–117 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-007-9240-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-007-9240-9

Keywords

Navigation