Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Can oil palm plantations become bird friendly?

  • Published:
Agroforestry Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite the increasing claims that structural complexity in agroforestry plantations is a key variable for enhancing bird biodiversity, few studies have experimentally manipulated the understory component of structural complexity. Here, we examined the impact of removing understory vegetation from oil palm plantations on the richness and abundance of birds in eastern Guatemala, testing if bird richness and abundance are positively affected by the presence of understory vegetation. Oil palm plantations with understory hold more bird richness and abundance than those lacking it. The experimental removal of this vegetation, equivalent to a reduction in complexity, decreases bird richness but not abudance. Our analysis shows clear effects of vegetation removal on bird richness, such that removal reduces richness and abundance to levels found in areas without understory. Hence, leaving or implementing structural complexity within plantations could satisfy the current need of making commodity production a cleaner industry, fulfilling both, the production of highly demanded commodities and the conservation of biodiversity in productive landscapes. Oil palm (Elaeis guineensis) is one of the most rapidly expanding crop in tropical regions, representing the major cause of loss of natural forests and of the decline of endangered species in several countries. Enhancing understory vegetation might reduce such negative effects. This is one of the few experimental tests about how a component of the vegetation and structural complexity of plantations affects birds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amoah FM, Nuertey BN, Baidoo-Addo K, Oppong FK, Osei-Bonsu K, Asamoah TEO (1995) Underplanting oil palm with cocoa in Ghana. Agrofor Syst 30:289–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aratrakorn S, Thunhikorn S, Donald P (2006) Changes in bird communities following conversion of lowland forest to oil palm and rubber plantations in southern Thailand. Bird Conserv Int 16:71–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung AYC, Eggelteon P, Speight MR, Hammond PM, Chey VK (2000) The diversity of beetle assemblages in different habitat types in Sabah, Malaysia. Bull Entomol Res 90:475–496

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clay JW (2004) World agriculture and the environment. A commodity-by-commodity guide to impacts and practices. Island Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Daily G, Ehrlich PR, Sánchez-Azofeifa A (2001) Countryside biogeography: use of human-dominated habitats by the avifauna of southern Costa Rica. Ecol Appl 11:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donald P (2004) Biodiversity impacts of some agricultural commodity production systems. Conserv Biol 18:17–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisermann K, Avendaño C (2006) Diversidad de aves en Guatemala, con una lista bibliográfica. In: Cano E (ed) Biodiversidad de Guatemala, vol 1. Universidad del Valle de Guatemala, Guatemala, pp 525–623

    Google Scholar 

  • Estades CF, Temple SA (1999) Temperate-forest bird communities in a fragmented landscape dominated by exotic pine plantations. Ecol Appl 9:573–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO-Food and Agricultural Organization (2007) FAOSTAT. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, Rome. Available at: http://faostat.fao.org

  • Fischer J, Brosi B, Daily GC, Ehrlich PR, Goldman R, Goldstein J, Lindenmayer DB, Manning AD, Mooney HA, Pejchar L, Ranganathan J, Tallis H (2008) Should agricultural policies encourage land sparing or wildlife-friendly farming? Front Ecol Environ 6:380–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzherbert EB, Struebig MJ, Morel A, Danielsen F, Brühl CA, Donald PF, Phalan B (2008) How will oil palm expansion affect biodiversity? Trends Ecol Evol 23:538–545

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Foley JA, DeFries R, Asner GP, Barford C, Bonan G, Carpenter SR, Chapin S, Coe M, Daily G, Gibbs HK, Helkowski JH, Holloway T, Howard E, Kucharik CJ, Monfreda C, Patz JA, Prentice IC, Ramankutty N, Snyder PK (2005) Global consequences of land use. Science 309:570–574

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon C, Manson R, Sundberg J, Cruz-Angoón A (2007) Biodiversity, profitability, and vegetation structure in a Mexican coffee agroecosystem. Agric Ecosyst Environ 118:256–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg R, Bichier P, Cruz-Angon A, Reitsma R (1997) Bird populations in shade and sun coffee plantations in central Guatemala. Conserv Biol 11:448–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grez AA, Moreno P, Elgueta M (2003) Coleopteros (Insecta: Coleoptera) epígeos asociados al bosque maulino y plantaciones de pino aledañas. Rev Chil Entomol 29:9–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley MJ (2002) Rationale and methods for conserving biodiversity in plantation forests. For Ecol Manag 155:81–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey C, González-Villalobos JA (2007) Agroforestry systems conserve species-rich but modified assemblages of tropical birds and bats. Biodivers Conserv 16:2257–2292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howell SNG, Webb S (1995) A guide to the birds of Mexico and Northern Central America. Oxford Unversity Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • INDESA-Inversiones de Desarrollo (2007) IX Aniversario Inversiones de Desarrollo. General technical report. INDESA, Guatemala

  • IUCN-International Union for Conservation of Nature (2007) Red list of threatened species. UICN, Geneve. Available at www.iucnredlist.org. Accesed 12 May 2008

  • Jose S (2009) Agroforestry for ecosystem services and environmental benefits: an overview. Agrofor Syst 76:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koh LP (2008a) Can oil palm be more hospitable for butterflies and birds? J Appl Ecol 45:1002–1009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koh LP (2008b) Birds defend oil palms from herbivorous insects. Ecol Appl 18:821–825

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koh LP, Wilcove D (2007) Cashing in palm oil for conservation. Nature 448:993–994

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koh LP, Wilcove D (2008) Is oil palm really destroying biodiversity? Conser Lett 1:60–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmayer DB, Hobbs RJ (2004) Fauna conservation in Australian plantation forests—a review. Biol Conserv 119:151–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pimm SL, Jones HL, Diamond J (1988) On the risk of extinction. Am Nat 132:757–785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ralph CJ, Geupel GR, Pyle P, Martin TE, DeSante DF, Borja M (1999) Handbook of field methods for monitoring landbirds. General technical report. PSW-GTR-144. Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Pacific Southwest Research Station, California

  • RSPO-Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (2005) RSPO principles and criteria for sustainable palm oil production. Public Release Version. Kuala Lampur

  • Simonetti JA (2006) Conservación de biodiversidad en ambientes fragmentados: el caso del bosque maulino. In: Grez AA, Simonetti JA, Bustamante R (eds) Biodiversidad en ambientes fragmentados de Chile: patrones y procesos a diferentes escalas. Editorial Universitaria, Santiago, pp 213–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone R (2007) Can palm oil plantations come clean? Science 317:1491

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D, Farigone J, Wolff B, D′Antonio C, Dobson A, Howarth R, Schindler D, Schlesinger WH, Simberloff D, Swackhamer D (2001) Forecasting agriculturally driven global environmental change. Science 292:281–292

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Turner E, Snaddon J, Fayle TM, Foser W (2008) Oil palm research in context. Plos One 3:e1572

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich W, Gotelli N (2007) Null model analysis of species nestedness patterns. Ecology 88:1824–1831

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Bael SA, Bichier P, Ochoa I, Greenberg R (2007) Bird diversity in cacao farms and forest fragments of western Panama. Biodivers Conserv 16:2245–2256

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank H. García and O. Nuñez, (Fundación Defensores de la Naturaleza) for their support and interest in this research. M.T. Milla, A. Pérez, E. Paná and A. Caal for their valuable help in the field, and R. Erales (INDESA), for granting permits to work in the palm plantation. Thanks to AGCI (Agencia de Cooperación Internacional de Chile) Fellowship for supporting A.N.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Javier A. Simonetti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nájera, A., Simonetti, J.A. Can oil palm plantations become bird friendly?. Agroforest Syst 80, 203–209 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-010-9278-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-010-9278-y

Keywords

Navigation