Skip to main content
Log in

Hemodynamics and Complications Encountered with Arteriovenous Fistulas and Grafts as Vascular Access for Hemodialysis: A Review

  • Published:
Annals of Biomedical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This review article describes the current state of affairs concerning in vivo, in vitro and in numero studies on the hemodynamics in vascular access for hemodialysis. The use and complications of autogenous and non-autogenous fistulas and catheters and access port devices are explained in the first part. The major hemodynamic complications are stenosis, initiated by intimal hyperplasia development, and thrombosis. The different in literature proposed conceivable causes of intimal hyperplasia development like surgical interventions, compliance mismatch, wall shear stress (WSS) and shear rate, vessel wall thrill and blood pressure are discussed on the basis of in vivo, in vitro and in numero studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Bassiouny, H. S., S. White, S. Glagov, E. Choi, D. P. Giddens, and C. K. Zarins. Anastomotic intimal hyperplasia: Mechanical injury or flow induced. J. Vasc. Surg. 15:708–716; discussion 716–7, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bassiouny, H. S., S. White, S. Glagov, E. Choi, D. P. Giddens, and C. K. Zarins. Anastomotic Intimal Hyperplasia—Mechanical Injury or Flow Induced. J. Vasc. Surg. 15(4):708–717, 1992.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bender, M. H. M., C. M. A. Bruyninckx, and P. G. G. Gerlag. The brachiocephalic elbow fistula—A useful alternative angioaccess for permanent hemodialysis. J. Vasc. Surg. 20(5):808–813, 1994.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Besarab, A. Intervention for intra-access stenosis. Semin. Dial. 14:401–402, 2001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bhandari, S., A. Wilkinson, and L. Sellars. Saphenous-vein forearm grafts and gortex thigh grafts as alternative forms of vascular access. Clin. Nephrol. 44(5):325–328, 1995.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Blackshear, P. L., F. D. Dorman, and E. J. Steinbach. Shear, wall interaction and hemolysis. Trans. Am. Soc. Artif. Int. Organs 12:113–120, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Boorgu, R., A. J. Dubrow, N. W. Levin, H. My, B. J. Canaud, J. R. Lentino, D. W. Wentworth, D. A. Hatch, J. Megerman, F. R. Prosl, V. C. Gandhi, and T. S. Ing. Adjunctive antibiotic/anticoagulant lock therapy in the treatment of bacteremia associated with the use of a subcutaneously implanted hemodialysis access device. ASAIO J. 46(6):767–770, 2000.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bosman, P. J., P. J. Blankestijn, Y. van der Graaf, R. J. Heintjes, H. A. Koomans, and B. C. Eikelboom. A comparison between PTFE and denatured homologous vein grafts for haemodialysis access: A prospective randomised multicentre trial. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 16(2):126–132, 1998.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Butler, C. E., and N. L. Tilney. Hemodialysis Access Pan B-Permanent. In: Replacement of Renal Function by Dialysis, edited by C. Jacobs, K. M. Koch, and J. F. Winchester. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1996, pp. 293–304.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Canaud, B., H. My, M. Morena, B. Lamy-Lacavalerie, H. Leray-Moragues, J. Y. Bosc, J. L. Flavier, P. Y. Chomel, H. D. Polaschegg, F. R. Prosl, and J. Mcgerman. Dialock: A new vascular access device for extracorporeal renal replacement therapy. Preliminary clinical results. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 14(3):692–698, 1999.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dammers, R., J. H. M. Tordoir, R. Welten, P. Kitslaar, and A. P. G. Hoeks. The effect of chronic flow changes on brachial artery diameter and shear stress in arteriovenous fistulas for hemodialysis. Int. J. Artif. Organs 25(2):124–128, 2002.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Depner, T. A., S. Rizwan, and T. A. Stasi. Pressure effects on roller pump blood flow during hemodialysis. ASAIO Trans. 36:M456–M459, 1990.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Elcheroth, J., L. Depauw, and P. Kinnaert. Elbow arieriovenous fistulas for chronic hemodialysis. Br. J. Surg. 81(7):982–984, Jul 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ene-Iordache, B., L. Mosconi, G. Remuzzi, and A. Remuzzi. Computational Fluid Dynamics of a vascular access case for hemodialysis. J. Biomech. Eng. Trans. ASME 123(3):284–292, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Enzler, M. A., T. Rajmon, M. Lachat, and F. Largiader. Long-term function of vascular access for hemodialysis. Clin. Transplant. 10(6):511–515, (Part 1), 1996.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 5th European Basic Multidisciplinary Hemodialysis Access Course. Brdo pri Kranj, Karger AG pp. 409–490, 2002.

  17. Fillinger, M. F., E. R. Reinitz, R. A. Schwartz, D. E. Resetarits, A. M. Paskanik, D. Bruch, and C. E. Bredenberg. Graft Geometry and Venous Intimal-Medial Hyperplasia in Arteriovenous. Loop Grafts J. Vasc. Surg. 11(4):556–566, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fisher, R. K., T. V. How, T. Carpenter, J. A. Brennan, and P. L. Harris. Optimising Miller cuff dimensions. The influence of geometry on anastomotic flow patterns. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 21(3):251–260, 2001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fry, D. L. Acute vascular endothelial changes associated with increased blood velocity gradients. Circulat. Res. 22:165–197, 1968.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gagne, P. J., J. Martinez, R. DeMassi, R. Gregory, F. N. Parent, R. Gayle, G. H. Meier, and C. Philput. The effect of a venous anastomosis Tyrell vein collar on the primary patency of arteriovenous grafts in patients undergoing hemodialysis. J. Vasc. Surg. 32(6):1149–1154, 2000.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Glagov, S. Intimal Hyperplasia, Vascular Modeling, and the Restenosis Problem. Circulation 89(6):2888–2891, 1994.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Glickman, M. H., G. K. Stokes, J. R. Ross, E. D. Schuman, W. C. Sternbergh, J. S. Lindberg, S. M. Money, and M. I. Lorber. Multicenter evaluation of a polyurethaneurea vascular access graft as compared with the expanded polytetrafluoroethylene vascular access graft in hemodialysis applications. J. Vasc. Surg. 34(3):465–472, 2001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hayashi, K., K. Mori, and H. Miyazaki. Biomechanical response of femoral vein to chronic elevation of blood pressure in rabbits. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circulat. Physiol. 284(2):H511–H518, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Heintjes, R. J., B. C. Eikelboom, J. J. F. Steijling, R. W. H. V. Dortland, F. H. W. M. Vanderheijden, M. Bastini, Y. Vandergraaf, P. J. Blankestijn, J. Vos. The results of denatured homologous vein grafts as conduits for secondary hemodialysisaccess surgery. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 9(1):58–63, 1995.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Heise, M., S. Schmidt, U. Krüger, R. Rückert, S. Rösier, P. Neuhaus, and U. Settmacher. Flow pattern and shear stress distribution of distal end-to-side anastomoses. A comparison of the instantaneous velocity fields obtained by panicle image velocimetry. J. Biomech. 37(7):1043–1051, 2004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hellums, J. D., and R. A. Hardwick. Response of platelets to shear stress-a review. In: The Rhology of Blood Vessels and Associated Tissues, edited by D. R. Gross and N. H. C. Hwang, Alphen aan den Rijn: Sijthoff and Noordhoff, 160–183, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hibberd, A. D. Brachiobasilic fistulat with autogenous basilic vein – surgical technique and pilot-study. Aust. New Zealand J. Surg. 61(8):631–635, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hill, R., A. Bagust, A. Bakhai, R. Dickson, Y. Dundar, A. Haycox, R. M. Mota, A. Reaney, D. Roberts, P. Williamson, and T. Walley. Coronary artery stents: a rapid systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol. Assess. 8(35): 1–242, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Himmelfarb, J., and T. Saad. Hemodialysis vascular access: Emerging concepts. Curr. Opin. Nephrol. Hypertens. 5:485–491, 1996.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hodges, T. C., M. F. Fillinger, R. M. Zwolak, D. B. Walsh, and F. Bech, J. L. Cronenwett. Longitudinal comparison of dialysis access methods: Risk factors for failure. J. Vasc. Surg. 26(6):1009–1019, DEC 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hofstra, L., D. Bergmans, A. P. G. Hoeks, P. Kitslaar, K. M. L. Leunissen, and J. H. M. Tordoir. Mismatch in Elastic Properties around Anastomoses of Interposition Grafts for Hemodialysis Access. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 5(5):1243–1250, 1994.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Hofstra, L., D. Bergmans, K. M. L. Leunissen, A. P. G. Hoeks, P. Kitslaar, M. Daemen, and J. H. M. Tordoir. Anastomotic intimal hyperplasia in prosthetic arteriovenous fistulas for hemodialysis is associated with initial high flow velocity and not with mismatch in elastic properties. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 6(6):1625–1633, 1995.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Jackson, Z. S., H. Ishibashi, A. L. Gotlieb, and B. L. Langille. Effects of anastomotic angle on vascular tissue responses at end-to-side arterial grafts. J. Vasc. Surg. 34(2):300–307, 2001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Jiang, Z. H., L. Z. Wu, B. L. Miller, D. R. Goldman, C. M. Fernandez, Z. S. Abouhamze, C. K. Ozaki, and S. A. Berceli. A novel vein graft model: adaptation to differential flow environments. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circulat. Physiol. 286(1):H240–H245, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Jindal, K. K., J. H. Ethier, R. M. Lindsay, P. E. Barre, J. E. Kappel, E. J. F. Carlisle, and A. Common. Clinical practice guidelines for vascular access. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 10(Suppl 13):S297–S305, 1999.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Keynton, R. S., M. M. Evancho, R. L. Sims, N. V. Rodway, A. Gobin, and S. E. Rittgers. Intimal hyperplasia and wall shear in arterial bypass graft distal anastomoses: An in vivo model study. J. Biomech. Eng. Trans. ASME 123(5):464–473, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Kirkman, R. L. Technique for flow reduction in dialysis access fistulas. Surg. Gynecol. & Obstetr. 172(3):231–233, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Kleinekofort, W., M. Kraemer, C. Rode, and V. Wizemann. Extracorporeal pressure monitoring and the detection of vascular access stenosis. Int. J. Artif. Organs 25:45–50, 2002.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kosch, M., A. Levers, M. Barenbrock, F. Matzkies, R. M. Schaefer, K. Kisters, K. H. Rahn, and M. Hausberg. Acute effects of haemodialysis on endothelial function and large artery elasticity. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 16(8):1663–1668, 2001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Krivitski, N. M., D. MacGibbon, R. D. Gleed, and A. Dobson. Accuracy of dilution techniques for access flow measurement during hemodialysis. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 31(3):502–508, 1998.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Kroll, M. H., J. D. Heliums, L. V. McIntire, A. I. Schafer, and J. L. Moake. Platelets and shear stress. Blood 88(5):1525–1541, 1996.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Krueger, U., J. Zanow, and H. Scholz. Computational fluid dynamics and vascular access. Artif. Organs 26(7):571–575, 2002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Kute, S. H., and D. A. Vorp. The effect of proximal artery flow on the hemodynamics at the distal anastomosis of a vascular bypass graft: Computational study. J. Biomech. Eng. Trans. ASME 123(3):277–283, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Leapman, S. B., M. Boyle, M. D. Pescovitz, M. L. Milgrom, R. M. Jindal, and R. S. Filo. The arteriovenous fistula for hemodialysis access: Gold standard or archaic relic? Am. Surg. 62(8):652–656, 1996.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Lee, D., J. M. Su, and H. Y. Liang. A numerical simulation of steady flow fields in a bypass tube. J. Biomech. 34(11):1407–1416, 2001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Lei, M., D. P. Giddens, S. A. Jones, F. Loth, and H. Bassiouny. Pulsatile flow in an end-to-side vascular graft model: Comparison of computations with experimental data. J. Biomech. Eng. Trans. ASME 123(1):80–87, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Lemson, M. S. Intimal hyperplasia in prosthetic vascular access The effect of flow variation and anastomotic geometry on its development. University Hospital Maastricht, PhD thesis, 2000.

  48. Leuprecht, A., K. Perktold, M. Prosi, T. Berk, W. Trubel, and H. Schima. Numerical study of hemodynamics and wall mechanics in distal end-to-side anastomoses of bypass grafts. J. Biomech. 35(2):225–236, 2002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Leverett, L. B., J. D. HellFums, C. P. Alfrey, and E. G. Lync. Red blood cell damage by shear stress. Biophys. J. 12:257–273, 1972.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Li, X. M., and S. E. Rittgers. Hemodynamic factors at the distal end-to-side anastomosis of a bypass graft with different POS: DOS flow ratios. J. Biomech. Eng. Trans. ASME 123(3):270–276, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Lindsay, R. M., E. Bradfield, C. Rothera, C. Kianfar, P. Malek, and B. G. Blake. A comparison of methods for the measurement of hemodialysis access recirculation and access blood flow rate. ASAIO J. 44:62–67, 1998.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Lindsay, R. M., P. G. Blake, P. Malek, G. Posen, B. Martin, and E. Bradfield. Hemodialysis access blood flow rates can be measured by a differential conductivity technique and are predictive of access clotting. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 30:475–482, 1997.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Long, Q., X. Y. Xu, K. V. Ramnarine, and P. Hoskins. Numerical investigation of physiologically realistic pulsatile flow through arterial stenosis. J. Biomech. 34(10):1229–1242, 2001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Longest, P. W., and C. Kleinstreuer. Computational haemodynamics analysis and comparison study of arterio-venous grafts. J. Med. Engin. & Technol. 24(3):102–110, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Longest, P. W., and C. Kleinstreuer. Numerical simulation of wall shear stress conditions and platelet localization in realistic end-to-side arterial anastomoses, J. Biomech. Eng. Trans. ASME 125(5):671–681, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Loth, F., P. P. Fischer, N. Arlan, C. D. Bertram, S. E. Lee, T. J. Royston, W. E. Shaalan, and H. S. Bassiouny. Transitional Flow at the venous anastomosis of an arteriovenous graft: potential activation of the ERK1/2 mechanotransduction pathway. J. Biomech. Eng. Trans. ASME 125:49–61, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Malek, A. M., S. L. Alper, and S. Izumo. Hemodynamic shear stress and its role in atherosclerosis. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 282(21):2035–2042, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Malovrh, M. 5th European Basic Multidisciplinary Hemodialysis Access Course. Brdo pri Kranj, Karger AG 20(4):442, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Malovrh, M. 5th European Basic Multidisciplinary Hemodialysis Access Course. Brdo pri Kranj, Karger AG 20(4):442, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  60. McCarley, P., R. L. Wingard, Y. Shyr, W. Pettus, R. M. Hakim, and T. A. Ikizler. Vascular access blood flow monitoring reduces access morbidity and costs. Kidney Int. 60:1164–1172, 2001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. McIntire, L.V., and R. R. Martin. Mechanical trauma induced PMN leucocyte dysfunction. In: The Rhology of Blood Vessels and Associated Tissues, edited by D. R. Gross and N. H. C. Hwang, Alphen aan den Rijn: Sijthoff and Noordhoff, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Megerman, J., N. W. Levin, T. S. Ing, B. Canaud, and H. My. Hemodialysis (HD) Access with the DialockTM device. Blood Purif. 16:242, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Meyerson, S. L., C. L. Skelly, M. A. Curi, U. M. Shakur, J. E. Vosicky, S. Glagov, and L. B. Schwartz. The effects of extremely low shear stress on cellular proliferation and neointimal thickening in the failing bypass graft. J. Vasc. Surg. 34(1):90–96, 2001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Miller, J. H., R. K. Foreman, L. Ferguson, and I. Faris. Interposition Vein Cuff for Anastomosis of Prosthesis to Small Artery. Aust. New Zealand J. Surg. 54(3):283–285, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Miller, P. E., A. Tolwani, C. P. Luscy, M. H. Deierhoi, R. Bailey, D. T. Redden, and M. Allon. Predictors of adequacy of arieriovenous fistulas in hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int. 56(1):275–280, 1999.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Mittal, R., S. P. Simmons, and H. S. Udaykumar. Application of large-eddy simulation to the study of pulsatile flow in a modeled arterial stenosis. J. Biomech. Eng. Trans. ASME 123(4):325–332, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Nassar, G. M., and J. C. Ayus. Infectious complications of the hemodialysis access. Kidney Int. 60:1–13, 2001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. National Kidney Foundation. K/DOQI Clinical practice guidelines for vascular access. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 37:S137–S181, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Neumann, M. E. Two new access devices have potential to replace the temporary catheter. Nephrol. News Issues 40, 1999.

  70. Nevarill, C. G., E. G. Lynch, C. P. Alfrey, and J. D. Hellums. Erythrocyte damage and destruction induced by shearing stress. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 71:781–790, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Neyra, N. R., T. A. Ikizler, R. E. May, J. Himmelfarb, G. Schulman, Y. Shyr, and R. M. Hakim. Change in access blood flow over time predicts vascular access thrombosis. Kidney Int. 54:1714–1719, 1998.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Nyberg, S. L., C. B. Hughes, Y. M. Valenzuela, B. M. Jenson, M. M. Benda, J. T. McCarthy, S. Sterioff, and M. D. Stegall. Preliminary experience with a cuffed ePTFE graft for hemodialysis vascular access. ASAIO J. 47(4):333–337, 2001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Ojha, M., R. S. C. Cobbold, and K. W. Johnston. Influence of Angle on Wall Shear-Stress Distribution for an End-to-Side. Anastomos. J. Vasc. Surg. 19(6):1067–1073, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Orpadt Flanders Survey, Results 2000, http://www.orpadt.be/documenten/ORPADT%202000%20ENG.pdf

  75. Paulson, W. D. Blood flow surveillance of hemodialysis grafts and the dysfunction hypothesis. Semin. Dial. 14(3):175–180, 2001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Paulson, W. D., S. J. Ram, C. G. Birk, M. Zapczynski, S. R. Martin, and J. Work. Accuracy of decrease in blood flow in predicting hemodialysis graft thrombosis. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 35:1089–1095, 2000.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Prischl, F. C., A. Kirchgatterer, E. Brandstatter, M. Wallner, C. Baldinger, F. X. Roithinger, and R, Kramar. Parameters of prognostic relevance to the patency of vascular access in hemodialysis patients. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 6(6):1613–1618, 1995.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Redwood, A. J., S. Moore, L. Sayadelmi, and M. Tennant. Autogenous artery grafts in hypertensive (SHR) rats do not have increased smooth muscle cell hyperplasia in the graft neointima, compared with grafts in normotensive rats. J. Anat. 195:407–412, 1999.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Revanur, V. K., A. G. Jardine, D. H. Hamilton, and R. M. Jindal. Outcome for arterio-venous fistula at the elbow for haemodialysis. Clin. Transplant. 14(4):318–322 (Part 1), 2000.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Rigg, K. M. Complications of Vascular Access. In: Dialysis Access, Current Practice, edited by J. A. Akoh, London: Imperial College Press, 2001, pp. 131–147.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Rodriguez, J. A., L. Armadans, E. Ferrer, A. Olmos, S. Codina, J. Bartolom, J. Borrellas, and L. Piera. The function of permanent vascular access. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. (7):402–408, 2000.

  82. Sabanayagam, P. 15-year experience with tapered (4–7 mm) and straight (6 mm) PTFE angio-access in the ESRD patient. In: Vascular Access for Hemodialysis, edited by M. L. Henry and R. M. Ferguson, Chicago: Precept Press, pp. 91–94, 1997.

  83. Salacinski, H. J., A. Tiwari, G. Hamilton, and A. M. Seifalian. Cellular engineering of vascular bypass grafts: role of chemical coatings for enhancing endothelial cell attachments. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 39(6):609–618, 2001.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Salacinski, H. J., G. Punshon, B. Krijgsman, G. Hamilton, and A. M. Seifalian. A hybrid compliant vascular graft seeded with microvascular endothelial cells extracted from human amentum. Artif. Organs 25(12):974–982, 2001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Salam, T. A., A. B. Lumsden, W. D. Suggs, and D. N. Ku. Low shear stress promotes intimal hyperplasia thickening. J. Vasc. Invest. 2:12–22, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Sands, J. The role of color-flow Doppler ultrasound in the management of hemodialysis accesses. ASAIO J. 44:41–43, 1998.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Sands, J. J., P. A. Jabyac, C. L. Miranda, and B. J. Kapsick. Intervention based on monthly monitoring decreases hemodialysis access thrombosis. ASAIO J. 45:147–150, 1999.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Schaffer, D. A prospective randomized trial of 6 mm versus 4–7 mm PTFE grafts for hemodialysis access in diabetic patients. Vascular access for hemodialysis, Chicago: Precept Press, 91–94, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Schneditz, D., E. Wang, and N. W. Levin. Validation of haemodialysis recirculation and access blood flow measured by thermodilution. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 14:376–383, 1999.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Schwab, S. J., J. R. Raymond, M. Saeed, G. E. Newman, P. A. Dennis, and R. R. Bellinger. Prevention of hemodialysis fistula thrombosis. Early detection of venous stenoses. Kidney Int. 36:701–711, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Schwab, S. J., M. J. Oliver, P. Suhocki, and R. McCann. Hemodialysis arteriovenous access: detection of stenosis and response to treatment by vascular access blood flow. Kidney Int. 59:358–362, 2001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Schwab, S. J., M. J. Oliver, P. Suhocki, and R. McCann. Hemodialysis arteriovenous access: detection of stenosis and response to treatment by vascular access blood flow. Kidney Int. 59:358–362, 2001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Sivanesan, S., T. V. How, and A. Bakran. Sites of stenosis in AV fistulae for haemodialysis access. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 14(1):118–120, 1999.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Sivanesan, S., T. V. How, R. A. Black, and A. Bakran. Flow patterns in the radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula: an in vitro study. J. Biomech. 32(9):915–925, 1999.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Steuer, R. R., D. R. Miller, S. Zhang, D. A. Bell, and J. K. Leypoldt. Noninvasive transcutaneous determination of access blood flow rate. Kidney Int. 60:284–291, 2001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Sutera, S. P. Flow-induced trauma to blood cells. Circulat. Res. 41:2–8, 1977.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Tang, D., J. Yang, C. Yang, and D. N. Ku. A nonlinear axisymmetric model with fluid-wall interactions for steady viscous flow in stenotic elastic tubes. J. Biomech. Eng. Trans. ASME 121(5): 494–501, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  98. Taylor, R. S., A. Loh, R. J. McFarland, M. Cox, and J. F. Chester. Improved Technique for Polytetrafluoroethylene Bypass-Grafting - Long-Term Results Using Anastomotic Vein Patches. Br. J. Surg. 79(4):348–354, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  99. Taylor, S. M., G. L. Eaves, D. A. Weatherford, J. C. McAlhany, H. E. Russell, E. M, Langan. Results and complications of arteriovenous access dialysis grafts in the lower extremity: A five year review. Am. Surg. 62(3):188–191, 1996.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Tonelli, M., K. Jindal, D. Hirsch, S. Taylor, C. Kane, and S. Henbrey. Screening for subclinical stenosis in native vessel arteriovenous fistulae. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 12:1729–1733, 2001.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Tordoir, J. H. Long-term follow-up of the polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) prosthesis as an arieriovenous fistula for haemodialysis. Eur. J. Vasc. Surg. 2(1):3–7, 1988.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Tordoir, J. H. M., H. G. Debruin, H. Hoeneveld, B. C. Eikelboom, and P. Kitslaar. Duplex Ultrasound Scanning in the Assessment ofArteriovenous-Fistulas Created for Hemodiafysis Access - Comparison with Digital Subtraction Angiography. J. Vasc. Surg. 10(2):122–128, 1989.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Turmel-Rodrigues, L., J. Pengloan, H. Rodrigue, G. Brillet, A. Lataste, D. Pierre, J. L. Jourdan, and D. Blanchard. Treatment of failed native arteriovenous fistulae for hemodialysis by interventional radiology. Kidney Int. 57(3):1124–1140, 2000.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Van Tricht, I., D. De Wachter, J. Tordoir, and P. Verdonck. Comparison of the hemodynamics in straight and tapered hemodialysis grafts by means of CFD. J. Biomech., in press.

  105. Van Tricht, I., D. De Wachter, J. Tordoir, and P. Verdonck. Assessment of stenosis in vascular access grafts. Int. J. Artif. Organs 28(7):617–622, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. Van Tricht, L., D. De Wachter, J. Tordoir, and P. Verdonck. Hemodynamics in a compliant In Vitro model of a Straight versus Tapered PTFE Arteriovenous Graft. J. Surg. Res. 116:297–304, 2004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Van Waeleghem, J. P., M. M. Elseviers, and E. J. Lindley. Management of vascular access in Europe. Part I: A study of centre based policies. EDTNA/ERCA J. 4:8–34, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  108. Wang, E., D. Schneditz, C. Nepomuceno, V. Lavarias, K. Martin, A. T. Morris, and N. W. Levin. Predictive value of access blood flow in detecting access thrombosis. ASAIO J. 44:M555–M558, 1998.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Winsett, O. E., and F. J. Wolma. Complications of vascular access for hemodialysis. Southern Med. J. 78(5):513–517, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ilse Van Tricht.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Van Tricht, I., De Wachter, D., Tordoir, J. et al. Hemodynamics and Complications Encountered with Arteriovenous Fistulas and Grafts as Vascular Access for Hemodialysis: A Review. Ann Biomed Eng 33, 1142–1157 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-005-5367-X

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-005-5367-X

Keywords

Navigation