Skip to main content
Log in

Muscle architecture of the common chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes): perspectives for investigating chimpanzee behavior

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Primates Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Thorpe et al. (Am J Phys Anthropol 110:179–199, 1999) quantified chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) muscle architecture and joint moment arms to determine whether they functionally compensated for structural differences between chimpanzees and humans. They observed enough distinction to conclude that musculoskeletal properties were not compensatory and suggested that chimpanzees and humans do not exhibit dynamically similar movements. These investigators based their assessment on unilateral limb musculatures from three male chimpanzees, of which they called one non-adult representative. Factors such as age, sex, and behavioral lateralization may be responsible for variation in chimpanzee muscle architecture, but this is presently unknown. While the full extent of variation in chimpanzee muscle architecture due to such factors cannot be evaluated with data presently available, the present study expands the chimpanzee dataset and provides a preliminary glimpse of the potential relevance of these factors. Thirty-seven forelimb and 36 hind limb muscles were assessed in two chimpanzee cadavers: one unilaterally (right limbs), and one bilaterally. Mass, fiber length, and physiological cross-sectional area (PCSA) are reported for individual muscles and muscle groups. The musculature of an adult female is more similar in architectural patterns to a young male chimpanzee than to humans, particularly when comparing muscle groups. Age- and sex-related intraspecific differences do not obscure chimpanzee-human interspecific differences. Side asymmetry in one chimpanzee, despite consistent forelimb directional asymmetry, also does not exceed the magnitude of chimpanzee-human differences. Left forelimb muscles, on average, usually had higher masses and longer fiber lengths than right, while right forelimb muscles, on average, usually had greater PCSAs than left. Most muscle groups from the left forelimb exhibited greater masses than right groups, but group asymmetry was significant only for the manual digital muscles. The hind limb exhibited less asymmetry than the forelimb in most comparisons. Examination of additional chimpanzees would clarify the full range of inter- and intra-individual variation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander R McN (1974) The mechanics of jumping by a dog (Canis familiaris). J Zool London 173:549–573

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander R McN (1981) Mechanics of skeleton and tendons. In: Brooks VB (ed) Handbook of physiology. The nervous system. Bethesda, American Physiological Society, pp 17–42

  • Anapol FC, Barry K (1996) Fiber architecture of the extensors of the hindlimb in semiterrestrial and arboreal guenons. Am J Phys Anthropol 99:429–447

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Anapol FC, Gray JP (2003) Fiber architecture of the intrinsic muscles of the shoulder and arm in semiterrestrial and arboreal guenons. Am J Phys Anthropol 122:51–65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Anapol FC, Jungers WL (1986) Architectural and histochemical diversity within the quadriceps femoris of the brown lemur (Lemur fulvus). Am J Phys Anthropol 69:355–375

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Babcock SK (1994) Hindlimb muscle morphology and mechanical adaptation in Galagos: an analysis of scale, function and phylogeny. PhD thesis, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich., USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass WM (1995) Human osteology—a laboratory and field manual. 4th edn. Missouri Archaeological Society, Columbia, Mo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson KJ (2005) Investigating the form-function interface in African apes—relationships between principal moments of area and positional behaviors in femoral and humeral diaphyses. Am J Phys Anthropol 127:312−334

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chhibber SR, Singh I (1970) Asymmetry in muscle weight and one-sided dominance in the human lower limbs. J Anat 106:553–556

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chhibber SR, Singh I (1972) Asymmetry in muscle weight in the human upper limbs. Acta Anat 81:462–465

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Colell M, Segarra MD, Sabater Pi J (1995) Hand preferences in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), Bonobos (Pan paniscus), and orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus) in food-reaching and other daily activities. Int J Primatol 16:413–434

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutts A (1988a) Shrinkage of muscle fibres during the fixation of cadaveric tissue. J Anat 160:75–78

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cutts A (1988b) The range of sarcomere lengths in the muscles of the human lower limb. J Anat 160:79–88

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Demes B, Fleagle JG, Lemelin P (1998) Myological correlates of prosimian leaping. J Hum Evol 34:385–399

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deuel NR, Lawrence LM (1987) Laterality in the gallop gait of horses. J Biomech 20:645–649

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Doran DM (1989) Chimpanzee and pygmy chimpanzee positional behavior: the influence of environment, body size, morphology, and ontogeny on locomotion and posture. PhD thesis, State University of New York, Stony Brook, N.Y., USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Doran DM (1992) The ontogeny of chimpanzee and pygmy chimpanzee locomotor behavior: a case study of paedomorphism and its behavioral correlates. J Hum Evol 23:139–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doran DM (1993) Sex differences in adult chimpanzee positional behavior: the influence of body size on locomotion and posture. Am J Phys Anthropol 91:99–115

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Doran DM (1996) The comparative positional behavior of African apes. In: McGrew WC, Nishida T (eds) Great ape societies. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 213–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Doran DM (1997) Ontogeny of locomotion in mountain gorillas and chimpanzees. J Hum Evol 32:323–344

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Doran DM, Hunt KD (1994) Comparative locomotor behavior of chimpanzees and bonobos: species and habitat differences. In: Wrangham RW, McGrew WC, de Waal FBM, Heltne PG (eds) Chimpanzee cultures. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 93–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Gans C (1982) Fiber architecture and muscle function. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 10:160–207

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gans C, Bock WJ (1965) The functional significance of muscle architecture: a theoretical analysis. Adv Anat Embryol Cell Biol 38:115–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Gans C, De Vries F (1987) Functional bases of fiber length and angulation in muscle. J Morphol 192:63–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garn SM, Mayor GH, Shaw HA (1976) Paradoxical bilateral asymmetry in bone size and bone mass in the hand. Am J Phys Anthropol 45:209–210

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haapasalo H, Kontulainen S, Sievänen H, Kannus P, Järvinen M, Vuori I (2000) Exercise-induced bone gain is due to enlargement in bone size without a change in volumetric bone density: a peripheral quantitative computed tomography study of the upper arms of male tennis players. Bone 27:351–357

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holder MK (1999) Influences and constraints on manual asymmetry in wild African primates: reassessing implications for the evolution of human handedness and brain lateralization. PhD thesis, Department of Anthropology, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, N.J., USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins WD (1993) Posture and reaching in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus). J Comp Psychol 107:162–168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins WD (1994) Hand preferences for bimanual feeding in 140 captive chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): rearing and ontogenetic determinants. Dev Psychobiol 27:395–407

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins WD (1995) Hand preferences for a coordinated bimanual task in 110 chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): cross-sectional analysis. J Comp Psychol 109:291–297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins WD, Morris RD (1993) Handedness in great apes: a review of findings. Int J Primatol 14:1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt KD (1989) Positional behavior in Pan troglodytes at the Mahale mountains and the Gombe stream national parks, Tanzania. PhD thesis, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich., USA

  • Hunt KD (1991a) Mechanical implications of chimpanzee positional behavior. Am J Phys Anthropol 86:521–536

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt KD (1991b) Positional behavior in the hominoidea. Int J Primatol 12:95–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt KD (1992) Positional behavior of Pan troglodytes in the Mahale mountains and Gombe stream national parks, Tanzania. Am J Phys Anthropol 87:83–107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kawakami Y, Muraoka Y, Kubo K, Suzuki Y, Fukunaga T (2000) Changes in muscle size and architecture following 20 days of bed rest. J Gravit Physiol 7:53–59

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kawakami Y, Nakazawa K, Fujimoto T, Nozaki D, Miyashita M, Fukunaga T (1994) Specific tension of elbow flexor and extensor muscles based on magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Appl Physiol 68:139–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacreuse A, Parr LA, Smith HM, Hopkins WD (1999) Hand preferences for a haptic task in Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Int J Primatol 20:867–881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson SG, Stern JT Jr (1987) EMG of chimpanzee shoulder muscles during knuckle-walking: problems of terrestrial locomotion in a suspensory adapted primate. J Zool London 212:629–655

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieber RL, Fridén J (2000) Functional and clinical significance of skeletal muscle architecture. Muscle Nerve 23:1647–1666

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lieber RL, Fridén J (2001) Clinical significance of skeletal muscle architecture. Clin Orthop 383:140–151

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marchant LF, McGrew WC (1996) Laterality of limb function in wild chimpanzees of Gombe National Park: comprehensive study of spontaneous activities. J Hum Evol 30:427–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martorell R, Mendoza F, Mueller WM, Pawson IG (1988) Which side to measure: right or left? In: Lohman TG, Roche AF, Martorell R (eds) Anthropometric standardization reference manual. Human Kinetics Books, Champaign, Ill., pp 87–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Maughan RJ, Abel RW, Watson JS, Weir J (1986) Forearm composition and muscle function in trained and untrained limbs. Clin Physiol 6:389–396

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McGrew WC, Marchant LF (1997) On the other hand: current issues in and meta-analysis of the behavioral laterality of hand function in nonhuman primates. Yrbk Phys Anthropol 40:201–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Méndez J, Keys A (1960) Density and composition of mammalian muscle. Metabolism 9:184–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Morbeck ME, Galloway A, Mowbray KM, Zihlman AL (1994) Skeletal asymmetry and hand preferences during termite fishing by gombe chimpanzees. Primates 35:99–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Narici MV, Maganaris CN, Reeves ND, Capodaglio P (2003) Effect of aging on human muscle architecture. J Appl Physiol 95:2229–2234

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer RA (2002) Chimpanzee right-handedness reconsidered: evaluating the evidence with funnel plots. Am J Phys Anthropol 118:191–199

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pande BS, Singh I (1971) One-sided dominance in the upper limbs of human fetuses as evidenced by asymmetry in muscle and bone weight. J Anat 109:457–459

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeiffer S (1980) Age changes in the external dimensions of adult bone. Am J Phys Anthropol 52:529–532

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Plato CC, Wood JL, Norris AH (1980) Bilateral asymmetry in bone measurements of the hand and lateral hand dominance. Am J Phys Anthropol 52:27–31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Proctor KL, Adams WC, Shaffrath JD, Van Loan MD (2002). Upper-limb bone mineral density of female collegiate gymnasts versus controls. Med Sci Sports Exerc:1830–1835

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauwerdink GP (1993) Muscle fiber and tendon lengths in primate extremities. In: Preuschoft H, Chivers DJ (eds) Hands of primates. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 207–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks RD, Roy RR (1982) Architecture of the hind limb muscles of cats: functional significance. J Morphol 173:185–195

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt-Nielsen K (1990) Animal physiology: adaptation and environment. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Schell LM, Johnston FE, Smith DR, Paolone AM (1985) Directional asymmetry of body dimensions among white adolescents. Am J Phys Anthropol 67:317–322

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shahnoor N, Anapol F (1998) Architectural correlates of locomotion in the hind limb muscles of two guenon species. Am J Phys Anthropol [Suppl]26:200

    Google Scholar 

  • Taaffe DR, Lewis B, Marcus R (1994) Quantifying the effect of hand preference on upper limb bone mineral and soft tissue composition in young and elderly women by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Clin Physiol 14:393–404

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thorpe SKS, Crompton RH, Gunther MM, Ker RF, Alexander R McN (1999) Dimensions and moment arms of the hind- and forelimb muscles of common chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Am J Phys Anthropol 110:179–199

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wickiewicz TL, Roy RR, Powell PL, Edgerton VR (1983) Muscle architecture of the human lower limb. Clin Orthop Relat Res 179:275–283

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wickiewicz TL, Roy RR, Powell PL, Perrine JJ, Edgerton VR (1984) Muscle architecture and force-velocity relationships in humans. J Appl Physiol 57:435–443

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Young WB, James R, Montgomery I (2002) Is muscle power related to running speed with changes of direction? J Sports Med Phys Fitness 42:282–288

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zajac FE (1992) How musculotendon architecture and joint geometry affect the capacity of muscles to move and exert force on objects: a review with application to arm and forearm tendon transfer design. J Hand Surg 17A:799–804

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Dick Adams for acquiring the two chimpanzees used in this study and for providing other supplies that facilitated this work. I also would like to thank the Yerkes Primate Research Center and Harold McClure for providing background information for Ind. 2 (Cheri). I am grateful for the dissection facilities provided by the Zooarchaeology Laboratory in the Department of Anthropology, and the Medical Sciences Program of Indiana University. I thank Della Cook, Brigitte Demes, Kevin Hunt, Susan Larson, and Travis Pickering for sharing thoughts and suggestions concerning this topic. Brigitte Demes, Kevin Hunt, Susan Larson, and multiple anonymous reviewers provided critical comments on the manuscript that improved all aspects of it.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kristian J. Carlson.

About this article

Cite this article

Carlson, K.J. Muscle architecture of the common chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes): perspectives for investigating chimpanzee behavior. Primates 47, 218–229 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10329-005-0166-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10329-005-0166-4

Keywords

Navigation