Skip to main content
Log in

Pathologies biliopancréatiques, tumeurs sous-muqueuses, échoendoscopie — endothérapie biliopancréatique

Bilio-pancreatic diseases, endoscopic ultrasound, bilio-pancreatic endotherapy

  • Comptes-Rendus De Congrès / Congresses, Conferences
  • Published:
Acta Endoscopica

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Références

  1. Thornton GD, Mcphail MJ, Nayagam S, Hewitt MJ, Vlavianos P, Monahan KJ. Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration for the diagnosis of pancreatic cystic neoplasms: a metaanalysis. Pancreatology 2013;13:48–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tanaka M, Fernández-Del Castillo C, Adsay V, Chari S, Falconi M, Jang JY, et al. International consensus guidelines 2012 for the management of Ipmn and Mcn of the pancreas. Pancreatology 2012;12:183–197.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Napoléon B, Lemaistre AI, Giovannini M, Caillol F, Pujol B, Lepilliez V, et al. Needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (NCLE) allows in vivo characterization of pancreatic serous cystadenomas (Sca). United European Gastroenterology Journal 2013;1(Suppl 1):A10.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fusaroli P, Serrani M, D’Ercole C, Ceroni L, Guglielmo S, Caletti G. Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasonography (CHEUS) in the differential diagnosis of pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLS). United European Gastroenterology Journal 2013;1(Suppl 1):A101.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dumonceau JM, Polkowski M, Larghi A, Vilmann P, Giovannini M, Frossard JL, et al. Indications, results, and clinical impact of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) clinical guideline. Endoscopy 2011;43:897–912.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kitano M, Kudo M, Yamao K, Takagi T, Sakamoto H, Komaki T, et al. Characterization of small solid tumors in the pancreas: the value of contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography. Am J Gastroenterol 2012;107:303–310.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Piscaglia F, Nolsøe C, Dietrich CF, Cosgrove DO, Gilja OH, Bachmann Nielsen M. The EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations on the clinical practice of contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS): update 2011 on non-hepatic applications. Ultraschall Med 2012;33:33–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Seicean A, Moldovan-Pop A, Vultur S, Tefas C, Botan E, Zaharia, et al. The incremental role of the contrast enhanced endoscopic ultrasound in guiding fine needle aspiration for pancreatic masses. United European Gastroenterology Journal 2013;1(Suppl 1):A61.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Iglesias-Garcia J, Larino-Noia J, Abdulkader I, Forteza J, Dominguez-Munoz JE. Quantitative endoscopic ultrasound elastography: an accurate method for the differentiation of solid pancreatic masses. Gastroenterology 2010;139:1172–1180.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sakamoto H, Kitano M, Kudo M. Differential diagnosis of SMT and evaluation of malignant potential GISTs by contrast enhanced harmonic EUS. United European Gastroenterology Journal 2013;1(1S):A100.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tokunaga S, Kida M, Yamauchi H, Okuwaki K, Iwai T, Miyazawa S, et al. Doubling time (DT) of gastrointestinal submucosal tumors. United European Gastroenterology Journal 2013;1(1S):A187.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Iglesias-Garcia J, Dominguez-Muñoz Je, Lariño-Noia J. Quantitative endoscopic ultrasound elastography (q-eus-e) for the differential diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses: a validation study. United European Gastroenterology Journal 2013;1(Suppl 1):A62.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Costamagna G, Tringali A, Mutignani M, Perri V, Spada C, Pandolfi M, et al. Endotherapy of postoperative biliary strictures with multiple stents: results after more than 10 years of follow-up. Gastrointest Endosc 2010;72:551–557.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dumonceau JM, Tringali A, Blero D, Devière J, Laugier R, Heresbach D, et al. Biliary stenting: indications, choice of stents and results: european society of gastrointestinal endoscopy (ESGE) clinical guideline. Endoscopy 2012;44:277–298.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Deviere JM, Reddy DN, Puspok A, et al. 147 preliminary results from a 187 patient multicenter prospective trial using metal stents for treatment of benign biliary strictures. Gastrointestinal Endosc 2012;75:Ab123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Halttunen J, Haapamaki C, Udd M, Lindström O, Gronroos J, Saarela A, et al. Preliminary results of a randomized study of multiple plastic stents versus covered metallic stent (CSEMS) in the treatment of biliary stricture due to chronic pancreatitis. United European Gastroenterology Journal 2013;1(Suppl 1):A117.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Walter D, Vleggaar F., Siersema P. Cost concerns should not affect the choice for plastic or metal stent for unresectable malignant common bile duct obstruction: a randomized controlled trial. United European Gastroenterology Journal 2013;1(Suppl 1):A118.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dhir V, Artifon EL, Gupta K, Vila JJ, Frazao M, Maydeo A. A multicenter study on eus-guided expandable biliary metal stent placement: choice of access route, direction of stent insertion, and drainage route. United European Gastroenterology Journal 2013;1(Suppl 1):A28.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bories E, Caillol F, Pesenti C, Giovannini M. Endoscopic ultrasound guided hepatogastrostomy: large retrospective study. United European Gastroenterology Journal 2013;1(Suppl 1):A29.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C, Gooszen HG, Johnson CD, Sarr MG, et al. Classification of acute pancreatitis — 2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut 2013;62:102–111.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fernandes AI, Almeida N, Ferreira AM, Casela A, Camacho E, Amaro P, et al. Acute pancreatitis: is the new Atlanta classification useful in clinical practice. United European Gastroenterology Journal 2013;1(1S):A38.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Dumonceau JM, Andfulli A, Devière J, Mariani A, Rigaux J, Banon TH, et al. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline: prophylaxis of post-ERCP pancreatitis. Endoscopy 2010;42:503–515.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Elmunzer BJ, Scheiman JM, Lehman GA, Chak A, Mosler P, Higgins PD, et al. A randomized trial of rectal indomethacin to prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis. N Engl J Med 2012;366:1414–1422.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Libuit JM, Lomboy AR, de Lusong MA, Ong JP. Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory druigs (NSAIDS) in the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a meta-analysis. United European Gastroenterology Journal 2013;1(1S):A63.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Dubravcsik Z, Szepes A, Hritz I, Madacsy L. Analysis of risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis in patients who underwent prophylactic pancreatic duct stenting — results of a prospective, multicenter, controlled study. United European Gastroenterology Journal 2013;1(1S):A117.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bakker OJ and the Dutch Pancreatitis Study Group. Early versus on-demand nasoenteral feeding in severe pancreatitis: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. United European Gastroenterology Journal 2013;1(1S):A1.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Roug S, Novovic S, Feldager E, Knudsen JD, Schmidt PN. Infected walled-off pancreatic necrosis is associated with organ failure and mortality. United European Gastroenterology Journal 2013;1(1S):A63.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ardengh JC, Baron T, Taglieri E, Micelli-Neto O, Orsini ET, Motta G, et al. Results of programmed EUS-guided necrosectomy in patients with infected walled-off pancreatic necrosis after severe acute pancreatitis. United European Gastroenterology Journal 2013;1(1S):A29.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Shah RJ, Shah JN, Waxman I, Kowalski TE, Sanchez-Yaguc A, Nieto J, et al. EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts (PP) utilizing a novel anchoring, covered self-expanding metal stent (ACSEMS): results from a prospective, multi-center study. United European Gastroenterology Journal 2013;1(1S):A29

    Google Scholar 

  30. Bapaye A, Itoi T, Kongkam P, Dubale NA, Itokawa F. A new fully covered large bore wide flare metal stent for drainage of pancreatic fluid collections (PFC) — results of a multicenter study. United European Gastroenterology Journal 2013;1(1S):A64.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Juergensen C, Gottschalk U. Impact of pancreatic duct stenting on the long-term endocrine function in chronic alcoholic pancreatitis. United European Gastroenterology Journal 2013;1(1S):A64.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Lefort.

About this article

Cite this article

Lefort, C., Bories, E. Pathologies biliopancréatiques, tumeurs sous-muqueuses, échoendoscopie — endothérapie biliopancréatique. Acta Endosc 44, 68–74 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10190-013-0369-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10190-013-0369-2

Navigation