Skip to main content
Log in

Current Status of Uterine Leiomyosarcoma in the Tohoku Region: Results of the Tohoku Translational Center Development Network Survey

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Clinical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

To prepare for a future clinical trial for improving the long-term prognosis of patients with uterine leiomyosarcoma (ULMS), we conducted a multi-institutional survey in the Tohoku region of Japan.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study between 2011 and 2014 in member institutions of the Tohoku Translational Research Center Development Network.

Results

A total of 53 patients with ULMS were registered in 31 institutions for the present survey. The median patient age was 56 years, 67.9% of the patients were postmenopausal, 88.7% had a performance status of 0 or 1, and only 6 patients (11.3%) showed preoperative evidence of malignancy. Although retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy was performed in only 26.4% of patients, 64.2% patients were identified as having FIGO stage 1 disease; 73.6% were eligible to undergo complete surgery. Among 36 patients who were treated with postoperative chemotherapy, 28 (77.8%) received docetaxel and gemcitabine combination therapy. The most frequent recurrence site was the lungs, and the median progression-free survival of all enrolled patients was 11.7 months. However, the median progression-free survival and the median overall survival in patients with stages III and IV disease were 3.4 and 11.4 months, respectively.

Conclusion

Although ULMS was associated with a high rate of complete or optimal surgery, the long-term prognosis was poor. Effective postoperative therapy should be developed to improve the long-term prognosis of patients with ULMS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Toro JR, Travis LB, Wu HJ (2006) Incidence patterns of soft tissue sarcomas, regardless of primary site, in the Surveillance, epidemiology and end results program, 1978–2001: an analysis of 26,758 cases. Int J Cancer 119:2922–2930

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nodal RR, Thoresen SO (1997) Uterine sarcomas in Norway 1956–1992: incidence, survival and mortality. Eur J Cancer 33:907–911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Abeler VM, Royne O, Thoresen S et al (2009) Uterine sarcomas in Norway. a histopathological and prognostic survey of a total population from 1970 to 2000 including 419 patients. Histopathology 54:355–364

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Giuntoli RL, Metzinger DS, DiMarco CS et al (2003) Retrospective review of 208 patients with leiomyosarcoma of the uterus: prognostic indicators, surgical management, and adjuvant therapy. Gynecol Oncol 89:460–469

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sagae S, Yamashita K, Ishioka S et al (2004) Preoperative diagnosis and treatment results in 106 patients with uterine sarcoma in Hokkaido, Japan. Oncology 67:33–39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kokawa K, Nishiyama K, Ikeuchi M (2006) Clinical outcomes of uterine sarcomas: results from 14 years worth of experience in the Kinki district in Japan (1990-2003). Int J Gynecol Cancer 16:1358–1363

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Akahira J, Tokunaga H, Toyoshima M et al (2006) Prognoses and prognostic factors of carcinosarcoma, endometrial stromal sarcoma and uterine leiomyosarcoma: a comparison with uterine endometrial adenocarcinoma. Oncology 71:333–340

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gadducci A, Landoni F, Sartori E et al (1996) Uterine liomyosarcoma: analysis of treatment failures and survival. Gynecol Oncol 62:25–32

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mayerhofer K, Obermair A, Windbichler G et al (1999) Leiomyosarcoma of the uterus: a clinicopathologic multicenter study of 71 cases. Gynecol Oncol 74:196–201

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Farid M, Ong WS, Tang MH et al (2013) The influence of primary site on outcomes in leiomyosarcoma: a review of clinicopathologic differences between uterine and extrauterine disease. Am J Clin Oncol 36:368–374

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rauh-Hain JA, Oduyebo T, Diver EJ et al (2013) Uterine leiomyosarcoma: an updated series. Int J Gynecol Cancer 23:1036–1043

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Garcia C, Kubat JS, Fulton RS et al (2015) Clinical outcomes and prognostic marker in uterine leiomyosarcoma: a population-based cohort. Int J Gynecol Cancer 25:622–628

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ricci S, Giuntoli RL, Eisenhauer E et al (2013) Does adjuvant chemotherapy improve survival for women with early-stage uterine leiomyosarcoma? Gynecol Oncol 131:628–629

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mancari R, Signorelli M, Gadducci A et al (2014) Adjuvant chemotherapy in stage I-II uterine leiomyosarcoma: a multicentris retrospective study of 140 patients. Gynecol Oncol 133:531–536

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hensley ML, Ishill N, Soslow R et al (2009) Adjuvant gemcitabine plus docetaxel for completely resected stages I–IV high grade uterine leiomyosarcoma: results of a prospective study. Gynecol Oncol 112:563–567

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hensley ML, Blessing JA, Degeest K et al (2008) Fixed-dose rate gemcitabine plus docetaxel as second-line therapy for metastatic uterine leiomyosarcoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group phase II study. Gynecol Oncol 109:323–328

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Hensley ML, Blessing JA, Mannel R et al (2008) Fixed-dose rate gemcitabine plus docetaxel as first-line therapy for metastatic uterine leiomyosarcoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group phase II study. Gynecol Oncol 109:329–334

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Hensley ML, Wathen JK, Maki RG et al (2013) Adjuvant therapy for high-grade, uterus-limited leiomyosarcoma: results of a phase 2 trial (SARC 005). Cancer 15:1555–1561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Takano T, Niikura H, Ito K et al (2013) Feasibility study of gemcitabine and docetaxel in advanced or recurrent uterine leiomyosarcoma and undifferentiated endometrial sarcoma in Japan. Int J Clin Oncol 19:897–905

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. van der Graaf WT, Blay JY, Chawla SP et al (2012) Pazopanib for metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma (PALETTE): a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet 379:1879–1886

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Demetri GD, von Mehren M, Jones RL et al (2016) Efficacy and safety of trabectedin or dacarbazine for metastatic liposarcoma or leiomyosarcoma after failure of conventional chemotherapy: results of a phase III randomized multicenter clinical trial. J Clin Oncol 34:786–793

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Schoffski P, Chawla S, Maki RG et al (2016) Eribulin versus dacarbazine in previously treated patients with advanced liposarcoma or leiomyosarcoma: a randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase 3 trial. Lancet 16:1629–1637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tap WD, Jones RL, TineBA Van et al (2016) Olaratumab and doxorubicin versus doxorubicin alone for treatment of soft-tissue sarcoma: an open-label phase 1b and randomised phase 2 trial. Lancet 388:488–497

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yoh Watanabe.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tokunaga, H., Takahashi, F., Yamamoto, H. et al. Current Status of Uterine Leiomyosarcoma in the Tohoku Region: Results of the Tohoku Translational Center Development Network Survey. Int J Clin Oncol 22, 541–547 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-017-1097-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-017-1097-y

Keywords

Navigation