Skip to main content
Log in

Variables affecting clinical response to treatment of facial port-wine stains by flash lamp-pumped pulsed dye laser: the importance of looking beyond the skin

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Lasers in Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The response of port-wine stains (PWS) to conventional laser treatment in adults is difficult to predict. To assess the influence of local or systemic hemodynamic variables on the clearance of PWS by using flash lamp-pumped pulsed (FLPP) dye laser. All consecutive patients ages 18 years or older undergoing laser treatment for a facial PWS were eligible. Laser sessions were scheduled every 8 weeks. All patients were evaluated based on a standard scale with four evaluation categories, from no or minimal improvement to total or almost total clearance. Clearance was achieved by 50.1 % (95 % confidence interval 35.6–64.7) of patients after a maximum of 15 treatment sessions. In multivariate analysis, increased age, a newly described Type III capillaroscopic pattern, and presence of lesions in dermatome V2 were all associated with a reduced clinical response to treatment. In a model restricted to demographic pattern and patient characteristics, arterial hypertension was also associated with a lower clinical response. A strong association was found between arterial hypertension and the Type III capillaroscopic pattern. Age, arterial hypertension, capillaroscopic pattern, and body location should be considered when planning laser treatment of PWS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shirley MD, Tang H, Gallione CJ et al (2013) Sturge–Weber syndrome and port-wine stains caused by somatic mutation in GNAQ. N Engl J Med 368:1971–1979

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jacobs AH, Walton RG (1976) The incidence of birthmarks in the neonate. Pediatrics 58:218–222

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Alster TS, Lewis AB (1996) Dermatologic laser surgery. A review. Dermatol Surg 22:797–805

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bucci J, Goldberg D (2006) Past, present and future: vascular laser/light devices. J Cosmet Laser Ther 28:149–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kauvar A (1997) Long pulse and high energy pulsed dye laser treatment of port wine stains and hemangioma. Presented at the 24th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Dermatological Surgery, Boston

  6. Sivarajan V, Maclaren WM, Mackay IR (2006) The effect of varying pulse duration, wavelength, spot size and fluence on the response of previously treated capillary vascular malformations to pulsed-dye laser treatment. Ann Plast Surg 57:25–32

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jasim ZF, Handley JM (2007) Treatment of pulsed dye laser-resistant port-wine stain birthmarks. J Am Acad Dermatol 57:677–682

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bencini PL (1999) The multilayer technique: a new and fast approach for flash-pumped pulsed (FLPP) dye laser treatment of port wine stains (preliminary reports). Dermatol Surg 25:786–789

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rajaratnam R, Laughlin SA, Dudley D (2011) Pulsed dye laser double-pass treatment of patients with resistant capillary malformations. Lasers Med Sci 26:487–492

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Adatto MA, Luc-Levy J, Mordon S (2010) Efficacy of a novel intense pulsed light system for the treatment of port wine stains. J Cosmet Laser Ther 12:54–60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Izikson L, Nelson JS, Anderson RR (2009) Treatment of hypertrophic and resistant port wine stains with a 755 nm laser: a case series of 20 patients. Lasers Surg Med 41:427–432

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Yang MU, Yaroslavsky AN, Farinelli WA et al (2005) Long-pulsed neodymium:yttrium–aluminium–garnet laser treatment for port-wine stains. J Am Acad Dermatol 52:480–490

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kono T, Frederick Groff W, Chan HH, Sakurai H, Yamaki T (2009) Long-pulsed neodymium:yttrium–aluminum–garnet laser treatment for hypertrophic port-wine stains on the lips. J Cosmet Laser Ther 11:11–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Geronemus RG (2006) Long-pulsed neodymium:yttrium–aluminum–garnet laser treatment for port wine stains. J Am Acad Dermatol 54:923

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Landthaler M, Hohenleutner U, Abd El Raheem TA (1995) Therapy of vascular lesions in the head and neck area by means of argon, Nd:YAG, and flashlamp-pumped pulsed dye lasers. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 49:81–86

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Borges da Costa J, Boixeda P, Moreno C, Santiago J (2009) Treatment of resistant port-wine stains with a pulsed dual wavelength 595 and 1064 nm laser: a histochemical evaluation of the vessel wall destruction and selectivity. Photomed Laser Surg 27:599–605

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Whang KK, Byun JY, Kim SH (2009) A dual-wavelength approach with 585-nm pulsed-dye laser and 800-nm diode laser for treatment-resistant port-wine stains. Clin Exp Dermatol 34:436–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Alster TS, Tanzi EL (2009) Combined 595-nm and 1,064-nm laser irradiation of recalcitrant and hypertrophic port-wine stains in children and adults. Dermatol Surg 35:914–918

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Eubanks LE, McBurney EI (2001) Videomicroscopy of port-wine stains: correlation of location and depth of lesion. J Am Acad Dermatol 44:948–951

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. No authors listed (2007) Summary of the 2007 European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. Vasc Health Risk Manag 3:783–95

    Google Scholar 

  21. Renfro L, Geronemus RG (1993) Anatomical differences of port-wine stains in response to treatment with the pulsed dye laser. Arch Dermatol 129:182–188

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Motley RJ, Lanigan SW, Katugampola GA (1997) Videomicroscopy predicts outcome in treatment of port-wine stains. Arch Dermatol 133:921–922

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Taddei S, Salvetti A (2002) Endothelial dysfunction in essential hypertension: clinical implications. J Hypertens 20:1671–1674

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hoefer IE, den Adel B, Daemen MJ (2013) Biomechanical factors as triggers of vascular growth. Cardiovasc Res. doi:10.1093/cvr/cvt089

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Cheung CY, Tay WT, Mitchell P et al (2011) Quantitative and qualitative retinal microvascular characteristics and blood pressure. J Hypertens 29:1380–1391

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Schreiber S, Bueche CZ, Garz C, Braun H (2013) Blood brain barrier breakdown as the starting point of cerebral small vessel disease?—New insights from a rat model. Exp Transl Stroke Med 5:4

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None

Financial disclosure

None reported

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luigi Naldi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bencini, P.L., Cazzaniga, S., Galimberti, M.G. et al. Variables affecting clinical response to treatment of facial port-wine stains by flash lamp-pumped pulsed dye laser: the importance of looking beyond the skin. Lasers Med Sci 29, 1365–1370 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-014-1525-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-014-1525-4

Keywords

Navigation