Skip to main content
Log in

An algorithmic approach to the optimization of process cogeneration

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In most industrial processes, there is a significant need for electric power and for heating. Process cogeneration is aimed at the simultaneous provision of combined heat and power. The net result is usually a reduction in the overall cost and emissions of greenhouse gases. Therefore, there is a significant need for the optimal design of process cogeneration systems. This objective of this paper is to introduce an algorithmic approach to the optimal design of process cogeneration systems. Focus is given to the interaction of the power cycle with the process heat requirements. Because of the need for explicit thermodynamic expressions, a new set of thermodynamic correlations of steam properties is developed for proper inclusion within a mathematical-programming approach. An optimization formulation is developed to provide a generally applicable tool for integrating the process and the power cycle and for identifying the optimum equipment size, operating parameters (such as boiler pressure, superheat temperature and steam load). The objective can be chosen as minimizing the cost, satisfying the heat requirement of the process, or producing the maximum possible of power. A case study is solved to illustrate the applicability of the devised approach and associated thermodynamic correlations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Thubaiti M, Al-Azri N, El-Halwagi M (2008) Optimize heat transfer networks: an innovative method applies heat integration to cost effectively retrofit bottlenecks in utility systems. Hydrocarbon Process 87:109–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Branan C (2002) Rules of thumb for chemical engineers. Gulf Professional Publishing, Houston

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhole V, Linnhoff B (1993) Total site targets for fuel, co-generation, emissions and cooling. Comput Chem Eng 17:s101–s109

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • El-Halwagi MM (1997) Pollution prevention through process integration. Academic, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Halwagi MM (2006) Process integration. Academic/Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Halwagi MM, Harell D, Spriggs HD (2008) Targeting cogeneration and waste utilization through process integration. Appl Energy. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2008.08.011

  • Evans FL Jr (1971) Equipment design handbook for refineries and chemical plants. Gulf Publishing Co, Houston

    Google Scholar 

  • Fronseca JG Jr (2003) Análise Energética e Exergética de um Ciclo Rankine com Aquecimento Distrital: Estudo de uma Planta Termoelétrica. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre

  • Grossmann IE (1985) Mixed-integer programming approach for the synthesis of integrated process flowsheets. Comput Chem Eng 9:463–482

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hul C-W, Natori Y (1996) An industrial application using mixed-integer programming technique: a multi-period utility system model. Comput Chem Eng 20:S1577–S1582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumana and Associates (2003) How to calculate the true cost of steam, Rep. No. DOE/GO-102003-1736. US Department of Energy, Washington, DC

  • Maia LOA, Qassim RY (1997) Synthesis of utility systems with variable demands using simulated annealing. Comput Chem Eng 21:947–950

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mavromatis SP, Kokossis AC (1998) Conceptual optmisation of utility networks for operational variations I. Targets and level optimisation. Chem Eng Sci 53:1585–1608

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Papandreou V, Shang Z (2008) A multi-criteria optimisation approach for the design of sustainable utility systems. Comput Chem Eng 32:1589–1602

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Papoulias SA, Grossmann IE (1983) A structural optimization approach in process synthesis-I utility system. Comput Chem Eng 7:695–706

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Toral MA, Morton W, Mitchell DR (2001) The use of new SQP methods for the optimization of utility systems. Comput Chem Eng 25:287–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seider WD, Seader JD, Lewin DR (2004) Product & process design principles. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith R (2005) Chemical process design and integration, 1st edn edn. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Varbanov PS, Doyle S, Smith R (2004) Modelling and optimization of utility systems. Trans ICheE 82:561–578

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkendorf F, Espuña A, Puigjaner L (1998) Minimization of the annual cost for complete utility systems. Chem Eng Res Des 76:239–245

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mahmoud El-Halwagi.

Appendix: Expressions for isentropic efficiency of the turbine

Appendix: Expressions for isentropic efficiency of the turbine

For a given turbine, the isentropic efficiency is a function of the flow load and hardware parameters provided by the manufacturer. This expression is based on Willan’s line that correlates the load to the power output. The isentropic efficiency is expressed by Eq. 21 (Mavromatis and Kokossis 1998).

$$ \eta_{\text{is}} = \frac{6}{5B}\left( {1 - \frac{{3.41443 \times 10^{6} A}}{{\Updelta h_{\text{is}} M^{\max } }}} \right)\,\left( {1 - \frac{{M^{\max } }}{6M}} \right) $$
(21)

A and B are constants dependent on the turbine and are functions of the inlet saturation temperature and the flow rate is measured in lb/h. A good approximation, within 2%, is given by the following straight line segments (Mavromatis and Kokossis 1998; Varbanov et al. 2004):

$$ A = a_{0} + a_{1} T^{\text{sat}} $$
(22)
$$ B = a_{2} + a_{3} T^{\text{sat}} $$
(23)

Another expression of the isentropic efficiency developed by (Varbanov et al. 2004) is:

$$ \eta_{\text{is}} = \frac{{n.m - W_{\text{INT}} }}{{m.\eta_{\text{mech}} .\Updelta H_{\text{is}} }} $$
(24)

Whereas n and W int are the slope and the intercept of the linear Willan’s line respectively and given by this equation:

$$ W_{\text{int}} = \frac{L}{b}(\Updelta H_{\text{is}} - \frac{a}{{m_{\max } }}) $$
(25)
$$ n = \frac{L + 1}{b}\left( {\Updelta H_{\text{is}} \,m_{\max } - a} \right) $$
(26)

With L is to be estimated by correlating the performance of each specific turbine. The parameters a and b depends on the type pf pressure, maximum power load and the saturation temperature differences as in the following table (Table 4; Smith 2005).

Table 4 The regression coefficients used in the isentropic efficiency equation
$$ a = a_{0} + a_{1} \,\Updelta T^{\text{sat}} $$
(27)
$$ b = a_{2} + {\text{a}}_{3} \Updelta T^{\text{sat}} $$
(28)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Al-Azri, N., Al-Thubaiti, M. & El-Halwagi, M. An algorithmic approach to the optimization of process cogeneration. Clean Techn Environ Policy 11, 329–338 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-008-0186-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-008-0186-z

Keywords

Navigation