Abstract
Green house gases (GHGs) pose some of the most profound impact on the environment. One viable alternative for reducing GHGs is the utilization of biomass to generate heat and power for processing facilities. The purpose of this paper is to address the utilization of biowaste or biomass source in a processing facility for combined heat and power (CHP). In particular, the paper addresses the following questions: How to incorporate biomass utilization in cofiring and energy production within an existing process? How to reconcile thermal demands with opportunities for power cogeneration through a process-integration framework? What are the economic factors that will insure the feasibility of biomass utilization and power cogeneration? What is the impact on GHG emissions and what are the necessary GHG emission pricing options? A systematic algebraic procedure for targeting cogeneration potential ahead of detailed power generation network design is presented. The approach presented here effectively utilizes biomass and biowaste sources as external fuel, and matches them with the use and dispatch of fuel sources within the process, heating and non-heating steam demands, and power generation. The concept of extractable power introduced by Harell and El-Halwagi AIChE Spring Meeting, New Orleans, March (2003) has been used as a basis of constructing this algebraic cogeneration targeting approach. Steam surpluses and deficits are identified by header balance. Flow balance is performed by cascade diagram techniques and extractable power is computed from net flows to target the cogeneration potential. Next, the paper discusses important economic factors (e.g., GHG pricing options) required for the cost-effective utilization of sole biomass feed or a co-fed mixture of biomass and fossil fuels for CHP. Two case studies are discussed to illustrate the presented approach. The first case study illustrates the developed targeting approach when no external fuel is required and all the higher pressure surplus streams are able to satisfy the lower pressure deficit headers. The second case shows the application of algebraic targeting to obtain the external fuel requirement when surplus headers are not able to meet the deficit demands. Further, this case shows the use of biomass for meeting the demands and the subsequent effects on economics and GHG emissions for the process.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bernotat K, Sandberg T (2004) Biomass fired small-scale CHP in Sweden and the Baltic States: a case study on the potential of clustered dwellings. Biomass Bioenerg 27:521–530
Chen Z, Elnashaie SSEH (2005) Economics of the clean fuel hydrogen in a novel autothermal reforming process. Ind Eng Chem Res 44(13):4834
Dhole VR, Linnhoff B (1993) Total site targets for fuel, co-generation, emissions, and cooling. Comp Chem Eng 17 (suppl): s101-s109
Dunn RF, El-Halwagi MM (2003) Process integration technology review: background and applications in the chemical process industry. J Chem Technol Biot 78:1011–1021
Duval Y (2001) Environmental impact of modern biomass cogeneration in Southeast Asia. Biomass Bioenerg 20:287–295
El-Halwagi MM (1997) Pollution prevention through process integration systematic design tools. Academic Press, New York
Elnashaie SSEH, Garhyan P (2004) Bioethanol production—solving the efficiency bottleneck. Chem Eng 755:30
Evans RJ, Czernik S, Chornet E, Feik CJ, French R, Phillips SD (2002) Engineering Scale Up of Renewable Hydrogen Production by catalytic Steam Reforming of Peanut Shells Pyrolysis Products. In: Proceedings of the US DOE hydrogen program review NREL/CP-610-32405
Harell DA (2004) Resource conservation and allocation via process integration. PhD Dissertation, Texas A&M University
Harell D, El-Halwagi M (2003) Design techniques and software development for cogeneration targeting with mass and energy integration. In: AIChE Spring Meeting, New Orleans, March, 2003
Hockstad L, Hanle L (2004) US Greenhouse gas emissions and sinks. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, EPA 430-R-04-003
Hughes E (2000) Biomass co-firing: economics, policy, and opportunities. Biomass Bioenerg 19:457–465
Husain Z, Zainal ZA, Abdullah MZ (2003) Analysis on biomass-residue-based cogeneration system in palm oil mills. Biomass Bioenerg 24:117–124
Kenney WF (1984) Energy conservation in the process industries, Academic, Orlando
Kimura H, Zhu XX (2000) Ind Eng Chem Res 39:2315–2335
Mavromatis SP, Kokossis AC (1998a) Conceptual optimization of utility networks for operational variations-I. Targets and level optimization. Chem Eng Sci 53(8):1585–1608
Mavromatis SP, Kokossis AC (1998b) Conceptual optimization of utility networks for operational variations-II. Network development and optimization. Chem Eng Sci 53(8):1609–1630
Mavromatis SP (1996) Conceptual design and operation of industrial steam turbine networks. PhD Thesis, University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology, Manchester, UK
Mbohwa C (2003) Bagasse energy cogeneration potential in the Zimbabwean sugar industry. Renew Energ 28:191–204
Mintzer I, Leonard JA, Schwartz P (2003) US Energy scenarios for the 21st century, (Prepared for the Pew Center on global climate change, Arlington) http://www.pewclimate.org/docUploads/EnergyScenarios%2Epdf
Nath K, Das D (2003) Hydrogen from biomass. Curr Sci 85(3):265
Papadopoulos DP, Katsigiannis PA (2002) Biomass energy surveying and techno-economic assessment of suitable CHP system installations, Biomass Bioenerg 22:105–124
Raissi K (1994) Total site integration. PhD Thesis, University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology, Manchester, UK
Smith JM, van Ness HC (1987) Introduction to chemical engineering thermodynamics. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York
Sundberg G, Henning D (2002) Investments in combined heat and power plants: influence of fuel price on cost minimized operation. Energ Convers Manage 43:639–650
Varbanov PS, Doyle S, Smith R (2004) Modeling and optimization of utility systems. Chem Eng Res Des 82(A5):561–578
Wahlund B, Yan J, Westermark M (2002) A total energy system of fuel upgrading by drying biomass feedstock for cogeneration: a case study of Skelleftea bioenergy combine. Biomass Bioenerg 23:271–281
Watson RT, Albritton DL (eds) (2002) Climate change 2001: synthesis report, summary for policymakers (third IPCC assessment report), an assessment of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, UK
van Wyk PHJ (2001) Biotechnology and the utilization of biowaste as a resource for bioproduct development. Trends Biotechnol 19(5):172–177
Acknowledgment
The financial support of this work by a grant from the US Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Center (grant no. USDA NRCS 68-3A75-3-152) is gratefully acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mohan, T., El-Halwagi, M.M. An algebraic targeting approach for effective utilization of biomass in combined heat and power systems through process integration. Clean Techn Environ Policy 9, 13–25 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-006-0051-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-006-0051-x