Skip to main content
Log in

Looking to the Future of Ecosystem Services

  • Published:
Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ecosystem services—the benefits that people obtain from ecosystems—are essential to human existence, but demands for services often surpass the capacity of ecosystems to provide them. Lack of ecological information often precludes informed decision making about ecosystem services. The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA) was conceived in part to provide the necessary ecological information to decision makers. To this end, the MA set out to address the stated needs and concerns of decision makers and examine the ecological dynamics and uncertainties underlying these concerns. To improve our understanding of their information needs and concerns, we interviewed 59 decision makers from five continents. The respondents indicated that although most people generally agree about the ideal state of the planet—free of poverty and extreme inequality, replete with cultural and biological diversity—they often disagree about the best way to achieve these goals. Further, although nonspecialists are generally concerned about the environment and may have a good understanding of some of issues, they often have a more limited grasp of the ecological dynamics that drive the issues of concern. We identify some of the principal uncertainties about ecosystem dynamics and feedbacks that underlie the concerns of decision makers. Each of the papers in this special feature addresses these ecological feedbacks from the perspective of a specific discipline, suggesting ways in which knowledge of ecological dynamics can be incorporated into the MA’s assessment and scenario-building process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alcamo J. 2001. Scenarios as tools for international environmental assessments. Environmental issue report no. 24. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, European Environment Agency

  • E Ayensu DR Classen M Collins A Dearing L Fresco M Gadgil H Gitay et al. (1999) ArticleTitleInternational ecosystem assessment Science 286 685–6 Occurrence Handle10.1126/science.286.5440.685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balee W. 1989. The culture of Amazon forests. In: Posey D, Balee W, editors. Resource management in Amazonia: indigenous and folk strategies. Advance in Economic Botany

  • G Chichilnisky G Heal (1998) ArticleTitleEconomic returns from the biosphere Nature 39 629–30 Occurrence Handle10.1038/35481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daily GC, editor. 1997. Nature’s services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems Island Press

  • Davis G. 1998. Creating scenarios for your company’s future. Corporate environmental, health, and safety excellence: bringing sustainable development down to earth. New York

  • L Deutsch C Folke K Skanberg (2003) ArticleTitleThe critical natural capital of ecosystem performance as insurance for human well-being Ecol Econ 44 205–17 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00274-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dudley N, Stolton S. 2003. Running pure: the importance of forest protected areas to drinking water. World Bank/WWF Alliance for Forest Conservation and Sustainable Use

  • CL Erickson (2000) ArticleTitleAn artificial landscape-scale fishery in the Bolivian Amazon Nature 408 190–93 Occurrence Handle10.1038/35041555 Occurrence Handle11089970

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • [EEA] European Environment Agency. 2001. Late lessons from early warnings: the precautionary principle 1896–2000. Environmental issue report no. 22. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities

  • JJ Ewel (1999) ArticleTitleNatural systems as models for the design of sustainable systems of land use Agrofor Syst 45 1–21 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1006219721151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallopín G, Hammond A, Raskin P, Swart R. 1997. Branch points: global scenarios and human choice. Stockholm: Stockholm Environment Institute. Available online at: http://www.gsg.org

  • B Glaser L Haumaier G Guggenberger W Zech (2001) ArticleTitleThe ’Terra Preta’ phenomenon: a model for sustainable agriculture in the humid tropics Naturwissenschaften 88 37–41 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s001140000193 Occurrence Handle11302125

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hawken P, Lovins A, Lovins H. 2000. Natural capitalism: creating the next industrial revolution. Boston: Back Bay Books

  • G Heal (2000) ArticleTitleValuing ecosystem services Ecosystems 3 24–30 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s100210000006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MJ Heckenberger A Kuikuro UT Kuikuro JC Russell M Schmidt C Fausto B Franchetto (2003) ArticleTitleAmazonia 1492: pristine forest or cultural parkland? Science 301 1710–14 Occurrence Handle10.1126/science.1086112 Occurrence Handle14500979

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • CS Holling (1986) The resilience of terrestrial ecosystems: local surprise and global change WC Clark RE Munn (Eds) Sustainable development of the biosphere Cambridge University Press Cambridge (UK) 292–317

    Google Scholar 

  • CS Holling GK Meffe (1996) ArticleTitleCommand and control and the pathology of natural resource management Conserv Biol 10 328–37 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10020328.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RB Jackson SR Carpenter CN Dahm DM McKnight RJ Naiman SL Postel SW Running (2001) ArticleTitleWater in a changing world Ecol Appl 11 1027–45

    Google Scholar 

  • M Loreau S Naeem P Inchausti J Bengtsson JP Grime A Hector DU Hooper et al. (2001) ArticleTitleEcology—biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: current knowledge and future challenges Science 294 804–8 Occurrence Handle10.1126/science.1064088 Occurrence Handle11679658

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • E Matthews R Payne M Rohweder S Murray (2000) Pilot analysis of global ecosystems: foreset ecosystems World Resources Institute Washington (DC) 90

    Google Scholar 

  • KS McCann (2000) ArticleTitleThe diversity–stability debate Nature 405 228–33 Occurrence Handle10.1038/35012234 Occurrence Handle10821283

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McDonough W, Braungart M. 2002. cradle to cradle: remaking the way we make things. North Point Press

  • InstitutionalAuthorName[MA] Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2003) People and ecosystems: a framework for assessment Island Press Washington (DC)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakićenović N, Alcamo J, Davis G, de Vries B, Fenhann J, Gaffin S, Gregory K, and others. 2000. Special Report on Emissions Scenarios: a special report of Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press. Available online at: http://www.ipcc.ch/

  • G Peterson CR Allen CS Holling (1998) ArticleTitleEcological resilience, biodiversity, and scale ecosystems 1 6–18 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s100219900002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G Peterson G Cumming SR Carpenter (2003) ArticleTitleScenario planning: a tool for conservation in an uncertain world Conserv Biol 17 1–10 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01717.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P Pinstrup-Andersen P Pandya-Lorch MW Rosegrant (1997) The world food situation: recent developments, emerging issues, and long term prospects International Food Policy Research Institute Washington (DC)

    Google Scholar 

  • C Revenga J Brunner N Henninger K Kassem R Payne (2000) Pilot analysis of global ecosystems: freshwater ecosystems World Resources Institute Washington (DC) 83

    Google Scholar 

  • M Sagoff (2002) ArticleTitleOn the value of natural ecosystems: the Catskills parable Politics Life Sci 21 16–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiklomanov IA. 1997. Comprehensive assessment of the freshwater resources of the world: assessment of water resources and water availability in the world. Stockholm: World Meteorological Organization and Stockholm Environment Institute

  • [UNEP] United Nations Environment Programme. 2002. Global Environmental Outlook 3. London: Earthscan. Available online at: http://www.unep.org/geo/geo3/

  • K Heijden ParticleVan der (1996) Scenarios: the art of strategic conversation Wiley New York

    Google Scholar 

  • PM Vitousek HA Monney J Lubchenco J Melilo (1997) ArticleTitleHuman domination of earth’s ecosystems Science 277 494–9 Occurrence Handle10.1126/science.277.5325.494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson RT, and others. 1998. Protecting our planet—securing our future. Washington (DC): United Nations Environment Programme, US National Aeronautics and Space Administration, World Bank

  • InstitutionalAuthorName[WBCSD] World Business Council for Sustainable Development (1997) Exploring sustainable development. Summary brochure WBCSD Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • RP White S Murray M Rohweder (2000) Pilot analysis of global ecosystems: grassland ecosystems World Resources Institute Washington (DC) 89

    Google Scholar 

  • SK Wood K Sebastian SJ Scherr (2000) Agroecosystems International Food Policy Research Institute and World Resources Institute Washington (DC) 110

    Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameWorld Commission on Dams. (2000) Dams and development: a new framework for decision-making Earthscan London

    Google Scholar 

  • [WWV] World Water Vision Commission Report. 2000. A water secure world. Vision for water, life and the environment. London: Earthscan. Available online at: http://www.worldwatercouncil.org/Vision/Documents/CommissionReport.pdf

Download references

Acknowledgments

Pieter Johnson, Graeme Cumming, and Colin Butler provided useful reviews of draft versions of the manuscript. Discussions with the Scenarios Working Group of the Millennum Ecosystem Assessment (MA) and other members of the MA community have been very helpful in developing the ideas presented in this special feature. We especially thank the many decision makers who gave freely of their time to participate in the interviews. Their wisdom and insights are greatly appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. M. Bennett.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bennett, E.M., Peterson, G.D. & Levitt, E.A. Looking to the Future of Ecosystem Services. Ecosystems 8, 125–132 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-004-0078-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-004-0078-y

Keywords

Navigation