Skip to main content
Log in

Occlusive dressing for large soft tissue defects following soft tissue tumor excision

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Orthopaedic Science

Abstract

Background

Reconstructive surgery using pedicles or free muscle-skin flaps and skin grafting reduces wound complications and promotes favorable limb function; however, the sacrifice of normal tissue remains problematic and complicated. Occlusive dressings are widely employed for management of injuries, burns, and surgical wounds. However, their effectiveness for treating soft tissue defects following a soft tissue tumor excision has not been fully elucidated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of an occlusive dressing treatment method for soft tissue defects following soft tissue tumor excisions.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed eight patients (three men, five women) whose wounds were treated with polyurethane foam occlusive dressings to allow reconstruction of the soft tissue defect following soft tissue tumor excision. Their mean age was 64.5 years (range 23–83 years), and the mean size of the defect was 60.1 cm2 (range 20–144 cm2). The wound was covered with a hydrophilic polyurethane dressing material. The treatment periods, incidence of complications, and ultimate outcomes were evaluated.

Results

Seven defects were completely healed by secondary intention without the requirement of any additional surgery. Mean treatment periods were 21.6 weeks (range 13.5–44.0 weeks). Mean follow-up periods were 33.1 months (range 15.8–48.6 months). One patient with a recurrent malignant fibrous histiocytoma (MFH) who had a history of radiotherapy required a posterior thigh flap 44 weeks after the surgery. Recurrence due to a positive surgical margin was observed in only one patient with recurrent MFH. None of the patients exhibited clinical evidence of superficial or deep infection.

Conclusions

This treatment method is simple, safe, and reliable. We concluded that the highly favorable indications of this treatment are ideal for patients who wish to avoid sacrificing their normal tissue, have no history of radiotherapy before surgery, and do not require chemotherapy or radiotherapy after the operation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bacci G, Ferrari S, Bertoni F, Ruggieri P, Picci P, Longhi A, et al. Long-term outcome for patients with nonmetastatic osteosarcoma of the extremity treated at the Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli according to the Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli/osteosarcoma-2 protocol: an updated report. J Clin Oncol 2000;18:4016–4027.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Meric F, Hess KR, Varma DG, Hunt KK, Pisters PW, Milas KM, et al. Radiographic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a predictor of local control and survival in soft tissue sarcomas. Cancer 2002;95:1120–1126.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Aksnes LH, Bauer HC, Jebsen NL, Follerås G, Allert C, Haugen GS, et al. Limb-sparing surgery preserves more function than amputation: a Scandinavian Sarcoma Group study of 118 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008;90:786–794.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Geller DS, Hornicek FJ, Mankin HJ, Raskin KA. Soft tissue sarcoma resection volume associated with wound-healing complications. Clin Orthop 2007;459:182–185.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Peat BG, Bell RS, Davis A, O’sullivan B, Mahoney J, Manktelow RT, et al. Wound-healing complications after soft-tissue sarcoma surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994;93:980–987.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Saddegh MK, Bauer HC. Wound complication in surgery of soft tissue sarcoma: analysis of 103 consecutive patients managed without adjuvant therapy. Clin Orthop 1993;289:247–253.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hoy E, Granick M, Benevenia J, Patterson F, Datiashvili R, Bille B. Reconstruction of musculoskeletal defects following oncologic resection in 76 patients. Ann Plast Surg 2006;57:190–194.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cordeiro PG, Neves RI, Hidalgo DA. The role of free tissue transfer following oncologic resection in the lower extremity. Ann Plast Surg 1994;33:9–16.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Disa JJ, Hu QY, Hidalgo DA. Retrospective review of 400 consecutive free flap reconstructions for oncologic surgical defects. Ann Surg Oncol 1997;4:663–669.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dyson M, Young S, Pendle CL, Webster DF, Lang SM. Comparison of the effects of moist and dry conditions on dermal repair. J Invest Dermatol 1988;91:434–439.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mertz PM, Marshall DA, Eaglstein WH. Occlusive wound dressings to prevent bacterial invasion and wound infection. J Am Acad Dermatol 1985;12:662–668.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Alvarez OM, Mertz PM, Eaglstein WH. The effect of occlusive dressings on collagen synthesis and re-epithelialization in super-ficial wounds. J Surg Res 1983;35:142–148.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hinman CD, Maibach H. Effect of air exposure and occlusion on experimental human skin wounds. Nature 1963;200:377–378.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Akita S, Akino K, Imaizumi T, Tanaka K, Anraku K, Yano H, et al. A polyurethane dressing is beneficial for splitthickness skin-graft donor wound healing. Burns 2006;32:447–451.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Von Lindern JJ, Niederhagen B, Appel T, Bergé S. Treatment of soft tissue defects with exposed bone in the head and face region with alginates and hydrocolloid dressings. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002;60:1126–1130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tufaro AP, Buck DW 2nd, Fischer AC. The use of artificial dermis in the reconstruction of oncologic surgical defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007;120:638–646.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Geller DS, Hornicek FJ, Mankin HJ, Raskin KA. Soft tissue sarcoma resection volume associated with wound-healing complications. Clin Orthop 2007;459:182–185.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Usui M, Ishii S, Naito T, Yamashita M, Yamamura M. Microsurgical reconstruction in limb-salvage procedures: comparison between primary and secondary reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 1993;9:91–101.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Barwick WJ, Goldberg JA, Scully SP, Harrelson JM. Vascularized tissue transfer for closure of irradiated wounds after soft tissue sarcoma resection. Ann Surg 1992;216:591–595.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bickels J, Kollender Y, Wittig JC, Cohen N, Meller I, Malawer MM. Vacuum-assisted wound closure after resection of musculoskeletal tumors. Clin Orthop 2005;441:346–350.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kopp J, Strnad V, Bach AD, Sauer R, Horch RE. Vacuum application increases therapeutic safety and allows intensified local radiation treatment of malignant soft-tissue tumors. Strahlenther Onkol 2005;181:124–130.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ono I, Gunji H, Zhang JZ, Maruyama K, Kaneko F. Studies on cytokines related to wound healing in donor site wound fluid. J Dermatol Sci 1995;10:241–245.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ono I, Gunji H, Zhang JZ, Maruyama K, Kaneko F. A study of cytokines in burn blister fluid related to wound healing. Burns 1995;21:352–355.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hatoko M, Kuwahara M, Tanaka A, Tada H, Yurugi S, Mashiba K, et al. Application of artificial dermis graft to correct a depression after tissue resection. Ann Plast Surg 2000;45:633–640.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Thomas DW, Hill CM, Lewis MA, Stephens P, Walker R, Von Der Weth A. Randomized clinical trial of the effect of semi-occlusive dressings on the microflora and clinical outcome of acute facial wounds. Wound Repair Regen 2000;8:258–263.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Geronemus RG, Robins P. The effect of two new dressings on epidermal wound healing. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1982;8:850–852.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Davis SC, Mertz PM, Eaglstein WH. Second-degree burn healing: the effect of occlusive dressings and a cream. J Surg Res 1990;48:245–248.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Sawada Y, Ara M, Yotsuyanagi T, Sone K. Treatment of dermal depth burn wounds with an antimicrobial agent-releasing silicone gel sheet. Burns 1990;16:347–352.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Friedman SJ, Su WP. Management of leg ulcers with hydrocolloid occlusive dressing. Arch Dermatol 1984;120:1329–1336.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Provan A, Phillips TJ. An overview of moist wound dressings: the under cover story. Dermatol Nurs 1991;3:393–396.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Takeuchi, A., Tsuchiya, H., Shirai, T. et al. Occlusive dressing for large soft tissue defects following soft tissue tumor excision. J Orthop Sci 14, 385–390 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-009-1353-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-009-1353-8

Keywords

Navigation