Skip to main content
Log in

Performance evaluation for proficiency testing with a limited number of participants

  • General Paper
  • Published:
Accreditation and Quality Assurance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Proficiency testing (PT) is an essential tool for laboratories to assess their competency. Also, participation in PT has become one of the mandatory requirements for laboratory to seek accreditation according to ISO/IEC 17025. For this reason, the effectiveness of performance evaluation by PT scheme is of great concern for the participants and for accreditation bodies as well. In practice, owing to unavailability of other appropriate alternatives, PT scheme providers may have to choose using consensus values to evaluate the performance of participants. However, such consensus values approach was not recommended by relevant international guidelines for PT schemes with limited number of participants. With the use of Monte Carlo simulation technique, this study attempted to investigate the effectiveness of using consensus values for performance evaluation in PT schemes with limited number of participants. The simulation process was schemed according to the statistical model provided by ISO 5725-1 for laboratory measurement results, which covered components like method bias, laboratory bias, and measurement precision. The effectiveness of the consensus value approach was expressed as the percentage of participants in a simulation run could get the same evaluation result, either satisfactory or unsatisfactory, against the “true value.” The findings indicated that the number of participants, choice of consensus values, mass fraction of analyte, method bias, laboratory bias, and measurement repeatability of participating laboratories would all affect the effectiveness of the consensus value approach but at different extent. However, under certain circumstances, use of consensus value could still be considered as an acceptable approach for performance evaluation even the number of participants was limited. Some of the findings were further verified using real data from PT schemes where appropriate certified reference materials or reliable reference values were available.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Thompson M, Ellison SLR, Wood R (2006) Pure Appl Chem 78(1):145–196

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. ISO 13528 (2005) Statistical methods for use in proficiency for testing by interlaboratory comparison. International Organization Standardization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  3. ILAC G13 (2007) Guidelines for the requirements for the competence of providers of proficiency testing schemes. International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation, Sydney

  4. Belli M, Ellision SLR, Fajgelj A, Kuselman I, Sansone U, Wegscheider W (2007) Accred Qual Assur 12:391–398

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kuselman I, Fajgelj A (2010) Pure Appl Chem 82:1099–1135

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. ISO/IEC 17043 (2010) Conformity assessment—General requirements for proficiency testing. International Organization Standardization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  7. ISO 5725-1 (1994) Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results—Part 1: general principles and definitions. ISO, Geneva, Switzerland

  8. Wong SK (2005) Accred Qual Assur 10:409–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Guell OA, Holcombe JA (1990) Anal Chem 62:529A–542A

  10. Thompson M, Lowthian PJ (1995) Analyst 120:271–272

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lawn RE, Thompson M, Walker RF (1997) Proficiency testing in analytical chemistry. Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge

  12. Thompson M (2004) AMC Technical Brief No. 17. Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  13. Thompson M (1999) Analyst 124:991

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gonzalez AG, Herrador MA, Asuero AG (2005) Accred Qual Assur 10:149–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Siu-kay Wong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wong, Sk. Performance evaluation for proficiency testing with a limited number of participants. Accred Qual Assur 16, 539–544 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-011-0816-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-011-0816-8

Keywords

Navigation