Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Quality assurance in flexible sigmoidoscopy: medical and nonmedical endoscopists

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The clinical assessment of position in colon and hence completion during flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) is believed to be inaccurate. The technique of applying endomucosal clips with follow-up X-ray has previously been used for establishing completion in colonoscopy. Furthermore, we have now trained non-healthcare professionals (non-medical endoscopists, NME) to perform FS, but there is no data on assessment of their performance of FS. We performed this study with the aims of determining accuracy of endoscopists’ clinical impression regarding actual position of endoscope in colon during FS, comparing medical (ME) and NME in terms of clinical accuracy, and to determine role of endomucosal clips with follow-up X-rays in documenting completion and hence quality assurance.

Methods

All patients undergoing elective FS, except those with surgical resection, were included, after ethics approval. During FS, endoscopist applied an endomucosal clip at most proximal bowel reached and endoscopists recorded their independent opinion about position of clip. Post procedure, all patients underwent an abdominal X-ray, reported by consultant radiologist, blinded to outcome of FS. X-ray results were compared with endoscopist findings. Complete FS was defined as one where descending colon was reached.

Results

Fifty-one patients, with median age of 55 years, participated in study. The endoscopists were accurate in their assessment of position in colon in 38 patients (75%). The attending nurse was accurate in only 31% of cases. The crude and corrected completion rates were 73% and 84%, respectively. There was no correlation between length of endoscope and its position in colon. There were no differences between NME and ME in terms of clinical accuracy.

Conclusion

This study has shown that clinical impression of endoscopist during FS regarding position is not very accurate, implying need for regular quality assurance. The technique of applying endomucosal clips with follow-on abdominal X-ray is an excellent objective measure of quality assurance in FS. NME can perform FS with comparable completion rates and accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Selby JV, Friedman GD, Quesenberry CPJ, Weiss NS (1992) A case–control study of screening sigmoidoscopy and mortality from colorectal cancer. N Eng J Med 326:653–657

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gilbertsen VA, Nelms JM (1978) The prevention of invasive cancer of the rectum. Cancer 41:1137–1139

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Thompson M, Prytherch D (1996) Rectal bleeding: when is it right to refer? Practitioner 240:198–200

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Atkin WS, Cuzick J, Northover JM, Whynes DK (1993) Prevention of colorectal cancer by once-only sigmoidoscopy. Lancet 341(8847):736–740

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lehman GA, Buchner DM, Lappas JC (1983) Anatomical extent of fibreoptic sigmoidoscopy. Gastroenterology 84:803–808

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Stewart BT, Keck JO, Duncan AV et al (1999) Difficult or incomplete flexible sigmoidoscopy: implications for a screening programme. Aust NZ J Surg 69:19–21

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Adam IJ, Ali Z, Shorthouse AJ (2000) How accurate is the endoscopist’s assessment of visualization of the left colon seen at flexible sigmoidoscopy? Colorectal Dis 2:41–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Maslekar S, Ramachadran M, Avery G, Duthie GS (2005) Role of endomucosal clips in quality assurance in colonoscopy. Endoscopy 27(Suppl 1):A274

    Google Scholar 

  9. Non-medical endoscopists: a report of the working party of the British Society of Gastroenterology. http://www.bsg.org.uk/bsgdisp1.php?id=dfe46c7d8f3f528587ae&h=1&m=00023. Accessed 21 March 2008

  10. Safety and sedation during endoscopic procedures. http://www.bsg.org.uk/pdf_word_docs/sedation.doc. Accessed 25 March 2008

  11. Investigators UFSST (2002) Single flexible sigmoidoscopy screening to prevent colorectal cancer: baseline findings of a UK multicentre randomised trial. Lancet 359:1291–1300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Thompson MR, Flashman KG, Wooldrage K, Rogers PA, Senapati A, O’Leary DP, Atkin W (2008) Flexible sigmoidoscopy and whole colonic imaging in the diagnosis of cancer in patients with colorectal symptoms. Br J Surg 95(9):1140–1146

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Levin TR, Farraye FA, Schoen RE, Hoff G et al (2005) Quality in the technical performance of screening flexible sigmoidoscopy: recommendations of an international multisociety task group. Gut 54:807–813

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Maslekar MH, Skinn E, Gardiner A, Culbert B, Duthie GS (2006) Non-medical colonoscopists are safe and effective: results from randomised controlled trial. Gut 55:A5

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Graeme Scott Duthie.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maslekar, S., Waudby, P., Avery, G. et al. Quality assurance in flexible sigmoidoscopy: medical and nonmedical endoscopists. Surg Endosc 24, 89–93 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0553-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0553-9

Keywords

Navigation