Skip to main content
Log in

Radio frequency identification (RFID) applied to surgical sponges

  • New Technology
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Use of gauze sponges that have been embedded with passive radio frequency identification (RFID) tags presents a high probability of reducing or eliminating instances of gossypiboma, or retained surgical sponge. The use of human counts during surgical operations, especially during instances where unexpected or emergency events occur, can result in errors where surgical instruments, most often gauze sponges, are retained within the patient’s body, leading to complications at a later date. Implementation of an automatic inventory record system, for instance, RFID, may greatly reduce these incidences by removing the human factor and would improve patient safety by eliminating the current sponge count protocol. Experiments performed by placing RFID-labeled sponges within an animal and removing them have demonstrated that tags are at least partially readable inside the body cavity and fully readable once removed, suggesting the possibility of an automated sponge count system pending further development of this technology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Christian CK, Gustafson ML, Roth EM, Sheridan TB, Gandhi TK, Dwyer K, Zinner MJ, Dierks MM (2006) A prospective study of patient safety in the operating room. Surgery 139:159–173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gawande AA, Studdert DM, Orav EJ, Brennan TA, Zinner MJ (2003) Risk factors for retained instruments and sponges after surgery. N Engl J Med 348:229–235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Zbar AP, Agrawal A, Saeed IT, Utidjian MR (1998) Gossypiboma revisited: a case report and review of the literature. J R Coll Surg Edinb 43:417–418

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kaiser CW, Friedman S, Spurling KP, Slowick T, Kaiser HA (1996) The retained surgical sponge. Ann Surg 224:79–84

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Clampitt HG, Jones EC (eds) (2006) RFID Certification Textbook. PWD Group Inc., Houston, TX

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bhuptani M, Moradpour S (2005) RFID Field Guide: Deploying Radio Frequency Identification Systems. Sun Microsystems, Santa Clara, CA

    Google Scholar 

  7. Shepard S (2005) RFID: Radio Frequency Identification. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  8. Macario A, Morris D, Morris S (2006) Initial clinical evaluation of a handheld device for detecting retained surgical gauze sponges using radiofrequency identification technology. Arch Surg 141:659–662

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Jones.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rogers, A., Jones, E. & Oleynikov, D. Radio frequency identification (RFID) applied to surgical sponges. Surg Endosc 21, 1235–1237 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9308-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9308-7

Keywords

Navigation