Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Manual robot assisted endoscopic suturing: Time-action analysis in an experimental model

  • Original article
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Robotic surgery systems were introduced to overcome the disadvantages of endoscopic surgery. The goal of this study was to assess whether robot assistance could support endoscopic surgeons in performing a complex endoscopic task.

Methods

Five experienced endoscopic surgeons performed end-to-end anastomosis on post-mortem porcine small intestine. The procedure was performed both with standard endoscopic techniques and with robotic assistance (da Vinci system, Intuitive Surgical, Sunny vale, CA). It was performed in three different working directions with a horizontal, vertical, and diagonal position of the bowel. Anastomosis time, number of stitches, knots, time per stitch, suture ruptures, and the number of stitch errors were recorded. Also, an action analysis was performed.

Results

Anastomosis time, number of stitches, and the number of knots did not differ significantly between the two groups. The time needed per stitch was significantly shorter with robot assistance (81.4 sec/stitch vs 95.9 sec/stitch, p = 0.005). More suture ruptures occurred in the robot group (0 (0–2) vs 0 (0–0), p = 0.003). In the standard group more stitch errors were found (2 (0–5) vs 0 (0–3), p = 0.017). These results were comparable for three different working directions. The action analysis, however, showed significant benefits of robotic assistance. The benefits were greatest in a vertical bowel position.

Conclusion

Robot assistance might offer added value to experienced endoscopic surgeons in the performance of a small-bowel anastomosis in an experimental setup, even though total anastomosis time could not be demonstrated to be shorter and some suture tears occurred due to the lack of force feedback.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. GH Ballantyne (2002) ArticleTitleRobotic surgery, telerobotic surgery, telepresence, and telementoring. Review of early clinical results. Surg Endosc 16 1389–1402 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00464-001-8283-7 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38nktlWktQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle12140630

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. U Berggren T Gordh D Grama U Haglund J Rastad D Arvidsson (1994) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy: hospitalization, sick leave, analgesia and trauma responses. Br J Surg 81 1362–1365 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByqD2c7itFQ%3D Occurrence Handle7953415

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. JC Bowersox A Shah J Jensen J Hill PR Cordts PS Green (1996) ArticleTitleVascular applications of telepresence surgery: initial feasibility studies in swine. J Vasc Surg 23 281–287 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymC1MrhslA%3D Occurrence Handle8637105

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. WD Boyd ND Desai B Kiaii R Rayman AH Menkis FN McKenzie RJ Novick (2000) ArticleTitleA comparison of robot-assisted versus manually constructed videoscopic coronary anastomosis. Ann Thorac Surg 70 839–842 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0003-4975(00)01738-0 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvmtlCqsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11016320

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. GB Cadiere J Himpens O Germay R Izizaw M Degueldre J Vandromme E Capelluto J Bruyns (2001) ArticleTitleFeasibility of robotic laparoscopic surgery: 146 cases. World J Surg 25 1467–1477 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38%2FjtlSmug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11760751

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. GF Dakin M Gagner (2003) ArticleTitleComparison of laparoscopic skills performance between standard instruments and two surgical robotic systems. Surg Endosc 17 574–579 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00464-002-8938-z Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3s7nvFGrug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle12582769

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. KT Boer Particleden LT Wit Particlede PH Davids J Dankelman DJ Gouma (2001) ArticleTitleAnalysis of the quality and efficiency in learning laparoscopic skills. Surg Endosc 15 497–503 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004640090002 Occurrence Handle11353969

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. KT Boer Particleden J Dankelman DJ Gouma HG Stassen (2002) ArticleTitlePeroperative analysis of the surgical procedure. Surg Endosc 16 492–499 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00464-001-8216-5 Occurrence Handle11928035

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. TA Emam G Hanna A Cuschieri (2002) ArticleTitleErgonomic principles of task alignment, visual display, and direction of execution of laparoscopic bowel suturing. Surg Endosc 16 267–271 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00464-001-8152-4 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD383jtVWruw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11967676

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. A Garcia-Ruiz M Gagner JH Miller CP Steiner JF Hahn (1998) ArticleTitleManual vs robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery in the performance of basic manipulation and suturing tasks. Arch Surg 133 957–961 Occurrence Handle10.1001/archsurg.133.9.957 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1cvitVaktA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9749847

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. J Marescaux MK Smith D Folscher F Jamali B Malassagne J Leroy (2001) ArticleTitleTelerobotic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: initial clinical experience with 25 patients. Ann Surg 234 1–7 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-200107000-00001 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MzlvFCisg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11420476

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. G Nilsson S Larsson F Johnsson (2000) ArticleTitleRandomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open fundoplication: blind evaluation of recovery and discharge period. Br J Surg 87 873–878 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01471.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvgtFymsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10931021

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. D Nio WA Bemelman KT Boer MS Dunker DJ Gouma TM Gulik (2002) ArticleTitleEfficiency of manual versus robotical (Zeus) assisted laparoscopic surgery in the performance of standardized tasks. Surg Endosc 16 412–415 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00464-001-9012-y Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD387psFSitg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11928018

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. SM Prasad HS Maniar NJ Soper RJ Damiano SuffixJr. ME Klingensmith (2002) ArticleTitleThe effect of robotic assistance on learning curves for basic laparoscopic skills. Am J Surg 183 702–707 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9610(02)00871-1 Occurrence Handle12095605

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. JP Ruurda IA Broeders (2003) ArticleTitleRobot-assisted laparoscopic intestinal anastomosis. Surg Endosc 17 236–241 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00464-002-9016-2 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3s%2Fms12ksg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle12399841

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. JP Ruurda TJ Vroonhoven ParticleVan IA Breeders (2002) ArticleTitleRobot-assisted surgical systems: a new era in laparoscopic surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 84 223–226 Occurrence Handle10.1308/003588402320439621 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38vls1Krtg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle12215022

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. JP Ruurda IA Breeders RK Simmermacher IH Rinkes TJ Vroonhoven ParticleVan (2002) ArticleTitleFeasibility of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery: an evaluation of 35 robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 12 41–45 Occurrence Handle12008761

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. G Stiff M Rhodes A Kelly K Telford CP Armstrong BI Rees (1994) ArticleTitleLong-term pain: less common after laparoscopic than open cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 81 1368–1370 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByqD2c7itFc%3D Occurrence Handle7953418

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. GT Sung IS Gill (2001) ArticleTitleRobotic laparoscopic surgery: a comparison of the Da Vinci and Zeus systems. Urology 58 893–898 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0090-4295(01)01423-6 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MnpvV2gsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11744453

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. VW Vanek R Rhodes DJ Dallis (1995) ArticleTitleResults of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy in a community hospital. South Med J 88 555–566 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByqB2M%2FgsFQ%3D Occurrence Handle7732447

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. P Yohannes P Rotariu P Pinto AD Smith BR Lee (2002) ArticleTitleComparison of robotic versus laparoscopic skills: is there a difference in the learning curve? Urology 60 39–45 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0090-4295(02)01717-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We cordially thank Prof. Dr N. M. Bax, Dr. F. J. Berends, Prof. Dr. M. A. Cuesta, I. M. Janssen, and Dr. D. C. van der Zee for their time and efforts invested in this study, as surgeons performing the anastomoses.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, 3508 GA, PO Box 85500, Utrecht, The Netherlands

    J. P. Ruurda, I. A. M. J. Broeders, B. Pulles, F. M. Kappelhof & C. van der Werken

Authors
  1. J. P. Ruurda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. I. A. M. J. Broeders
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. B. Pulles
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. F. M. Kappelhof
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. C. van der Werken
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. A. M. J. Broeders.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ruurda, J.P., Broeders, I.A.M.J., Pulles, B. et al. Manual robot assisted endoscopic suturing: Time-action analysis in an experimental model. Surg Endosc 18, 1249–1252 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-003-9191-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-003-9191-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation