Skip to main content
Log in

Linking limitation to species composition: importance of inter- and intra-specific variation in grazing resistance

  • Community Ecology - Original Paper
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Short-term responses of producers highlight that key nutrients (e.g., N, P)—or combinations of these nutrients—limit primary production in aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. These discoveries continue to provide highly valuable insights, but it remains important to ask whether nutrients always predominantly limit producers despite wide variation in nutrient supply and herbivory among systems. After all, predictions from simple food chain models (derived here) readily predict that limitation by grazers can exceed that by nutrients, given sufficient enrichment. However, shifts in composition of producers and/or increasing dominance of invulnerable stages of a producer can, in theory, reduce grazer limitation and retain primacy of nutrient limitation along nutrient supply gradients. We observed both mechanisms (inter- and intra-species variation in vulnerability to herbivory) working in a two-part mesocosm experiment. We incubated diverse benthic algal assemblages for several months either in the presence or absence of benthic macro-grazers in mesocosms that spread a broad range of nutrient supply. We then conducted short-term assays of nutrient and grazer limitation on these communities. In the “historically grazed” assemblages, we found shifts from more edible, better competitors to more resistant producers over enrichment gradients (as anticipated by the food web model built with a tradeoff in resistance vs. competitive abilities). However, contrary to our expectations, “historically ungrazed” assemblages became dominated by producers with vulnerable juvenile forms but inedible adult forms (long filaments). Consequently, we observed higher resource limitation rather than grazer limitation over this nutrient supply gradient in both “historically grazed” (expected) and “historically ungrazed” (not initially expected). Thus, via multiple, general mechanisms involving resistance to grazing (changes in species composition or variation in stage-structured vulnerability), producer assemblages should remain more strongly or as strongly limited by nutrients than grazers, even over large enrichment gradients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • APHA (1980) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 15th edn. APHA

  • Anderson MJ (2001) A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Aust Ecol 26:32–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson MJ (2002) CAP: a FORTRAN computer program for canonical analysis of principal coordinates. Department of Statistics, University of Auckland, New Zealand

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson MJ (2005) PERMANOVA: a FORTRAN computer program for permutational multivariate analysis of variance. Department of Statistics, University of Auckland, New Zealand

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson MJ, Robinson J (2003) Generalized discriminant analysis based on distances. Aust N Z J Stat 45:301–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson MJ, Willis TJ (2003) Canonical analysis of principal coordinates: an ecologically meaningful approach for constrained ordination. Ecology 84:511–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Augustine DJ, McNaughton SJ (1988) Ungulate effects on the functional species composition of plant communities: herbivore selectivity and plant tolerance. J Wild Manage 62:1165–1183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bachmann RW, Canfield Jr DE (1996) Use of an alternative method for monitoring total nitrogen concentrations in Florida lakes. Hydrobiologia 323:1–8

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bohannan BJM, Lenski RE (2000) The relative importance of competition and predation varies with productivity in a model community. Am Nat 153:73–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter SR, Kitchell JF (1993) The trophic cascade in lakes. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase JM (1999) Food web effects of prey size refugia: variable interactions and alternative stable equilibria. Am Nat 154:559–570

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chase JM, Leibold MA, Simms E (2000a) Plant tolerance and resistance in food webs: community-level predictions and evolutionary implications. Evol Ecol 14:289–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chase JM, Leibold MA, Downing AL, Shurin JB (2000b) The effects of productivity, herbivory, and plant species turnover in grassland food webs. Ecology 81:2485–2497

    Google Scholar 

  • Crumpton WG, Isenhart TM, Mitchell PD (1992) Nitrate and organic N analyses with second-derivative spectroscopy. Limnol Oceanogr 37:907–913

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Darcy-Hall TL (2006) Relative strengths of benthic algal nutrient and grazer limitation along a lake productivity gradient. Oecologia 148:660–671

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • de Mazancourt C, Loreau M, Abbadie L (1998) Grazing optimization and nutrient cycling: when do herbivores enhance plant production? Ecology 79:2242–2252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Roos AM, Persson L, McCauley E (2003) The influence of size-dependent life-history traits on the structure and dynamics of populations and communities. Ecol Lett 6:473–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeNicola DM, McIntire CD, Lamberti GA, Gregory SV, Ashkenas LR (1990) Temporal patterns of grazer–periphyton interactions in laboratory streams. Freshwater Biol 23:75–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downing JA, Osenberg CW, Sarnelle O (1999) Meta-analysis of marine nutrient-enrichment experiments: variation in the magnitude of nutrient limitation. Ecology 80:1157–1167

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudley T L, D’Antonio CM (1991) The effects of substrate texture, grazing, and disturbance on macroalgal establishment in streams. Ecology 72:297–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elser JJ, Marzolf ER, Goldman CR (1990) Phosphorus and nitrogen limitation of phytoplankton in the freshwaters of North America: a review and critique of experimental enrichments. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 47:1468–1477

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Elser JJ, Bracken MEE, Cleland EE, Gruner DS, Harpole WS, Hillebrand H, Ngai JT, Seabloom EW, Shurin JB, Smith JE (2008) Global analysis of nitrogen and phosphorus limitation of primary producres in freshwater, marine, and terrestrial ecosystem. Ecol Lett (in press)

  • Graham MD, Vinebrooke RD (1998) Trade-offs between herbivore resistance and competitiveness in periphyton of acidified lakes. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 55:806–814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grover JP (1997) Resource competition. Chapman & Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall SR, Smith VH, Lytle DA, Leibold MA (2005) Constraints on primary producer N:P stoichiometry along N:P supply ratio gradients. Ecology 86:1894–1904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harpole WS, Tilman D (2007) Grassland species loss due to reduced niche dimension. Nature 446:791–793

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harpole WS, Goldstein L, Aicher R (2008) Resource limitation. In: D’Antonio C, Corbin J, Stromberg M (eds) Ecology and management of California grasslands. University of California Press

  • Hecky RE, Kilham P (1988) Nutrient limitation of phytoplankton in freshwater and marine environments: a review of recent evidence on the effects of enrichment. Limnol Oceanogr 33:796–822

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hillebrand H, Dürselen C-D, Kirschtel D, Pollingher U, Zohary T (1999) Biovolume calculation for pelagic and benthic microalgae. J Phycol 35:403–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillebrand H, Kahlert M, Haglund A-L, Berninger U-G, Nagel S, Wickham S (2002) Control of microbenthic communities by grazing and nutrient supply. Ecology 83:2205–2219

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt RD, Grover JP, Tilman D (1994) Simple rules for interspecific dominance in systems with exploitative and apparent competition. Am Nat 144:741–771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howarth RW, Marino R (2006) Nitrogen as the limiting nutrient for eutrophication in coastal marine ecosystems: evolving views over three decades. Limnol Oceanogr 51:364–376

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huntly NJ (1987) Influence of refuging consumers (pikas: Ochotona princeps) on subalpine meadow vegetation. Ecology 68:274–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leibold MA (1996) A graphical model of keystone predators in food webs: trophic regulation of abundance, incidence, and diversity patterns in communities. Am Nat 147:784–812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leibold MA, Chase JM, Shurin JB, Downing AL (1997) Species turnover and the regulation of trophic structure. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 28:467–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe RL, Pan Y (1996) Benthic algal communities as biological monitors. In: Stevenson RJ, Bothwell ML, Lowe RL (eds) Algal ecology: freshwater benthic ecosystems. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 57–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubchenco J, Cubit J (1980) Heteromorphic life histories of certain marine algae as adaptations to variations in herbivory. Ecology 61:676–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McArdle BH, Anderson MJ (2001) Fitting multivariate models to community data: a comment on distance-based redundancy analysis. Ecology 82:290–297

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormick PV, Stevenson RJ (1991) Grazer control of nutrient availability in the periphyton. Oecologia 86:287–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oksanen L, Fretwell SD, Arruda J, Niemela P (1981) Exploitation ecosystems in gradients of primary productivity. Am Nat 118:240–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osenberg CW, Mittelbach GG (1996) The relative importance of resource limitation and predator limitation in food chains. In: Polis GA, Winemiller KO (eds) Food webs: integration of patterns and dynamics. Chapman & Hall, New York, pp 134–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Prepas EE, Rigler FH (1982) Improvements in quantifying the phosphorus concentration in lake water. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 39:822–829

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rosemond AD, Brawley SH (1996) Species-specific characteristics explain the persistence of Stigeoclonium tenue (Chlorophyta) in a woodland stream. J Phycol 32:54–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosemond AD, Mulholland PJ, Elwood JW (1993) Top-down and bottom-up control of stream periphyton: effects of nutrients and herbivores. Ecology 74:1264–1280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS (2003) SAS statistical software, version 9.1. SAS Institute, Cary

    Google Scholar 

  • Schindler DW (1977) Evolution of phosphorus limitation in lakes. Science 195:260–262

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith VH (2006) Responses of estuarine and coastal marine phytoplankton to nitrogen and phosphorus enrichment. Limnol Oceanogr 51:377–384

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith B, Wilson JB (1996) A consumer’s guide to evenness indices. Oikos 76:70–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiner CF (2003) Keystone predator effects and grazer control of planktonic primary production. Oikos 101:569–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinman AD (1996) Effects of grazers on freshwater benthic. In: Stevenson RJ, Bothwell ML, Lowe RL (eds) Algal ecology: freshwater benthic ecosystems. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 341–373

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinman AD, Mulholland PJ, Hill WR (1992) Functional responses associated with growth form in stream algae. J North Am Benthol Soc 11:229–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterner RW (1986) Herbivores’ direct and indirect effects on algal populations. Science 231:605–607

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss SY, Agrawal AA (1999) The ecology and evolution of plant tolerance to herbivory. Trends Ecol Evol 14:179–185

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tessier A, Bizina E, Geedey C (2001) Grazer–resource interactions in the plankton: Are all daphniids alike? Limnol Oceaongr 46:1585–1595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welschmeyer NA (1994) Fluorometric analysis of chlorophyll a in the presence of chlorophyll b and phaeopigments. Limnol Oceanogr 39:1985–1992

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Werner EE, Gilliam JF (1984) The ontogenetic niche and species interactions in size-structured populations. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 15:393–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

T. L. D.-H. was supported by an MSU University Distinguished Fellowship, an NSF pre-doctoral fellowship, an NSF RTG (research training grant) to KBS (DBI-9602252), and a George H. Lauff Research Award. S. R. H. was supported by NSF OCE 02-35039 to C. Cáceres and funds from Indiana University. We thank G. Mittelbach, O. Sarnelle, A. Tessier, K. Gross and R. J. Stevenson for comments on various versions of the manuscript, P. Geddes for help in the field and K. Manoylova for aid in algal identification. This is KBS contribution no. 1454.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tara L. Darcy-Hall.

Additional information

Communicated by Libby Marschall.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Online Appendices (DOC 216 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Darcy-Hall, T.L., Hall, S.R. Linking limitation to species composition: importance of inter- and intra-specific variation in grazing resistance. Oecologia 155, 797–808 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-007-0948-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-007-0948-z

Keywords

Navigation