Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A combined clinical and MRI approach for outcome assessment of traumatic head injured comatose patients

  • ORIGINAL COMMUNICATION
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is associated with substantial consumption of health care resources. No clinical or paraclinical examination can reliably predict neurological evolution. In this study, we evaluated the ability of a combined clinical and MRI approach to predict outcome.

Methods

This prospective study took place between June 2001 and March 2005 in a Neurosurgical Intensive Care Unit in Paris, France. Inclusion criteria were TBI patients still mechanically ventilated and without clinical signs of awareness after 2 weeks. Four clinical signs were assessed after cessation of sedation: grasping, yawning, chewing and paroxysmal sympathetic storm. FLAIR and T2* acquisitions on MRI were used in order to localize brain lesions. Statistically linked regions (clusters) were defined. Outcome was assessed at one year by Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS).

Findings

73 patients were included: 41 had poor outcome (GOS 1–3) and 32 had good outcome (GOS 4–5). Lesions in the clusters "right upper pons and right lower midbrain"," hypothalamus and basal forebrain","left parietal, left temporal, left occipital lobes and left insula" and the presence of grasping or chewing were associated with poor outcome in multivariate analysis. This combined clinical and MRI approach gives a much better prediction than MRI approach only (P < 0.009), with an area under the ROC curve of 0.94 (95 % CI, 0.89–1.00).

Interpretation

These data suggest that MRI associated with clinical assessment improves outcome prediction in severe TBI patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. (1995) Practice parameters: assessment and management of patients in the persistent vegetative state (summary statement). The Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 45:1015–1018

  2. Anderson CV, Wood DM, Bigler ED, Blatter DD (1996) Lesion volume, injury severity, and thalamic integrity following head injury. J Neurotrauma 13:35–40

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Blackman JA, Patrick PD, Buck ML, Rust RS Jr (2004) Paroxysmal autonomic instability with dystonia after brain injury. Arch Neurol 61:321–328

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Born JD, Albert A, Hans P, Bonnal J (1985) Relative prognostic value of best motor response and brain stem reflexes in patients with severe head injury. Neurosurgery 16:595–601

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Carpentier A, Galanaud D, Puybasset L, Muller J-C, Lescot T, Riedl V, Dormont D, van Effenterre R (2006) Combined magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy to predict long-term neurological outcome in severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 23:674–685

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. De Renzi E, Barbieri C (1992) The incidence of the grasp reflex following hemispheric lesion and its relation to frontal damage. Brain 115 Pt 1:293–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Denny-Brown D (1958) The nature of apraxia. J Nerv Ment Dis 126:9–32

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Firsching R, Woischneck D, Diedrich M, Klein S, Ruckert A, Wittig H, Dohring W (1998) Early magnetic resonance imaging of brainstem lesions after severe head injury. J Neurosurg 89:707–712

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Garnett MR, Blamire AM, Corkill RG, Cadoux-Hudson TA, Rajagopalan B, Styles P (2000) Early proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in normalappearing brain correlates with outcome in patients following traumatic brain injury. Brain 123 (Pt 10):2046–2054

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jellinger K, Seitelberger F (1970) Protracted post-traumatic encephalopathy. Pathology, pathogenesis and clinical implications. J Neurol Sci 10:51–94

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Jordan LM, Brownstone RM, Noga BR (1992) Control of functional systems in the brainstem and spinal cord. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2:794–801

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kampfl A, Franz G, Aichner F, Pfausler B, Haring HP, Felber S, Luz G, Schocke M, Schmutzhard E (1998) The persistent vegetative state after closed head injury: clinical and magnetic resonance imaging findings in 42 patients. J Neurosurg 88:809–816

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kampfl A, Schmutzhard E, Franz G, Pfausler B, Haring HP, Ulmer H, Felber S, Golaszewski S, Aichner F (1998) Prediction of recovery from post-traumatic vegetative state with cerebral magnetic-resonance imaging. Lancet 351:1763–1767

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Laowattana S, Zeger SL, Lima JAC, Goodman SN, Wittstein IS, Oppenheimer SM (2006) Left insular stroke is associated with adverse cardiac outcome. Neurology 66:477–483

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Laureys S, Goldman S, Phillips C, Van Bogaert P, Aerts J, Luxen A, Franck G, Maquet P (1999) Impaired effective cortical connectivity in vegetative state: preliminary investigation using PET. Neuroimage 9:377–382

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lavigne GJ, Kato T, Kolta A, Sessle BJ (2003) Neurobiological mechanisms involved in sleep bruxism. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 14:30–46

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lescot T, Bonnet MP, Zouaoui A, Muller JC, Fetita C, Coriat P, Puybasset L (2005) A quantitative computed tomography assessment of brain weight, volume, and specific gravity in severe head trauma. Intensive Care Med 31:1042–1050

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Levin HS, Mendelsohn D, Lilly MA, Yeakley J, Song J, Scheibel RS, Harward H, Fletcher JM, Kufera JA, Davidson KC, Bruce D (1997) Magnetic resonance imaging in relation to functional outcome of pediatric closed head injury: a test of the Ommaya- Gennarelli model. Neurosurgery 40:432–440; discussion 440–431

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mascia MM, Valls-Sole J, Marti MJ, Sanz S (2005) Chewing pattern in patients with Meige’s syndrome. Mov Disord 20:26–33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Murdoch I, Nicoll JA, Graham DI, Dewar D (2002) Nucleus basalis of Meynert pathology in the human brain after fatal head injury. J Neurotrauma 19:279–284

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ommaya AK, Gennarelli TA (1974) Cerebral concussion and traumatic unconsciousness. Correlation of experimental and clinical observations of blunt head injuries. Brain 97:633–654

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Parvizi J, Damasio AR (2003) Neuroanatomical correlates of brainstem coma. Brain 126:1524–1536

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Selden NR, Gitelman DR, Salamon- Murayama N, Parrish TB, Mesulam MM (1998) Trajectories of cholinergic pathways within the cerebral hemispheres of the human brain. Brain 121 (Pt 12):2249–2257

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Carter BG, Butt W (2005) Are somatosensory evoked potentials the best predictor of outcome after severe brain injury? A systematic review. Intensive Care Med 31:765–775

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Puybasset.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weiss, N., Galanaud, D., Carpentier, A. et al. A combined clinical and MRI approach for outcome assessment of traumatic head injured comatose patients. J Neurol 255, 217–223 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-008-0658-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-008-0658-4

Key words

Navigation