Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Neonatal outcome of IVF singletons versus naturally conceived in women aged 35 years and over

  • Materno-fetal Medicine
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the delivery and neonatal outcome of IVF singleton pregnancies with those conceived spontaneously in primiparous women ≥35 years of age.

Methods

Data were collected by the hospital’s obstetrics and pediatric staff at the time of examination, hospitalization, delivery and discharge. A total of 283 women with in vitro fertilization (IVF) singleton deliveries were matched according to ethnicity, age, gravidity, smoking habits, body mass index, weight gain in pregnancy, site and time of delivery with consecutive 283 women conceived spontaneously. The outcome measures were mode of delivery, birth weight, preterm birth and perinatal mortality.

Results

Cesarean delivery rate was more common in IVF pregnancies (39.9% vs. 25.1%; p < 0.001). Preterm delivery rate, specifically of spontaneous onset was significantly higher in IVF group (18.7%) than in spontaneous conception group (10.3%; p < 0.008). No difference was found in birth weight records (SGA, VLBW, LBW and LGA) or perinatal mortality rate. However, average gestational birth weight was lower among infants conceived after IVF (3,050 ± 587 g vs. 3,130 ± 524 g; p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Singleton IVF pregnancies in primiparous women ≥35 years of age have increased perinatal risk associated with higher rates of cesarean section, preterm births and infants of lower average birth weight. Nevertheless, pregnancy and delivery complications, number of infants with low or very low birth weight, small or large birth weight for appropriate gestation did not differ from those of the spontaneous conceptions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tan SL, Doyle P, Campbell S et al (1992) Obstetric outcome of in vitro fertilization pregnancies compared with normally conceived pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 167:778–784

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Though SC, Greene CA, Svenson LW, Belik J (2000) Effects of in vitro fertilization on low birth weight, preterm delivery, and multiple birth. J Pediatr 136:618–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Perri T, Chen R, Yoeli R et al (2001) Are singleton assisted reproductive technology pregnancies at risk of prematurity? J Assist Reprod Genet 18:245–249

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang JX, Clark AM, Kirby CA, Philipson G, Petrucco O, Anderson G, Matthews CD (1994) The obstetric outcome of singleton pregnancies following in vitro fertilization/gamete intra-fallopian transfer. Hum Reprod 9:141–146

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang Y, Sullivan E, Black D, Dean J, Bryant J, Chapman M (2005) Preterm birth and low birth weight after assisted reproductive technology-related pregnancy in Australia between 1996 and 2000. Fertil Steril 83:1650–1658

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Koivurova S, Hartikainen AL, Gissler M, Hemminki E, Sovio U, Jarvelin MR (2002) Neonatal outcome and congenital malformations in children born after in vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 17:1391–1398

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rimm AA, Katayama AC, Diaz M, Katayama KP (2004) A meta-analysis of controlled studies comparing major malformation rates in IVF and ICSI infants with naturally conceived children. J Assist Reprod Genet 21:437–443

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Isaksson R, Gissler M, Tiitinen A (2002) Obstetric outcome among women with unexplained infertility after IVF: a matched case–control study. Hum Reprod 17:1755–1761

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Koudstaal J, Braat DD, Bruinse HW, Naaktgeboren N, Vermeiden JP, Visser GH (2005) Obstetric outcome of singleton pregnancies after IVF: a matched control study in four Dutch university hospitals. Hum Reprod 15:1819–1825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ochsenkühn R, Strowitzki T, Gurtner M, Strauss A, Schulze A, Hepp H, Hillemanns P (2003) Pregnancy complications, obstetric risks, and neonatal outcome in singleton and twin pregnancies after GIFT and IVF. Arch Gynecol Obstet 268:256–261

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Buckett WM, Chian RC, Holzer H, Dean N, Usher R, Tan SL (2007) Obstetric outcomes and congenital abnormalities after in vitro maturation, in vitro fertilization, and intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Obstet Gynecol 110:885–891

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Simunic V, Tomic V, Tomic J, Nizic D (2007) Comparative study of the efficacy and tolerability of two vaginal progesterone formulations, Crinone 8% gel and Utrogestan capsules, used for luteal support. Fertil Steril 87:83–87

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Jackson RA, Gibson KA, Wu YM, Croughan MS (2004) Perinatal outcomes in singletons following in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 103:551–563

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. McDonalds SD, Murphy K, Beyene J, Ohlsson A (2005) Perinatal outcomes of singleton pregnancies achieved by in vitro fertilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 27:449–459

    Google Scholar 

  15. McGovern PG, Llorens AJ, Skurnick JH, Weiss G, Goldsmith LT (2004) Increased risk of preterm birth in singleton pregnancies resulting from in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer or gamete intrafallopian transfer: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 82:1514–1520

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Schieve LA, Ferre C, Peterson HB, Macaluso M, Reynolds MA, Wright VC (2004) Perinatal outcome among singleton infants conceived through assisted reproductive technology in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 103:1144–1153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mushayandebvu TI, Goldsmith LT, Von Hagen S, Santoro N, Thurston D, Weiss G (1998) Elevated maternal serum relaxin concentrations throughout pregnancy in singleton gestations after superovulation. Obstet Gynecol 92:17–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Weiss G, Goldsmith LT, Sachdev R, Von Hagen S, Lederer K (1993) Elevated first-trimester serum relaxin concentrations in pregnant women following ovarian stimulation predict prematurity risk and preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol 82:821–828

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Luke B, Brown MB (2007) Contemporary risks of maternal morbidity and adverse outcomes with increasing maternal age and plurality. Fertil Steril 88:283–293

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Suzuki S, Miyake H (2008) Obstetric outcomes in nulliparous women aged 35 and over with singleton pregnancies conceived by in vitro fertilization. Arch Gynecol Obstet 277:225–227

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ahlborg L, Ek S, Fridström M, Kublickas M, Leijon M, Nisell H (2006) Is fetal growth impaired after in vitro fertilization? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 85:195–199

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Human Reproduction, University Hospital Center “Sisters of Mercy”, Vinogradska 29, 10 000, Zagreb, Croatia

    Vlatka Tomic & Jozo Tomic

Authors
  1. Vlatka Tomic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jozo Tomic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vlatka Tomic.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tomic, V., Tomic, J. Neonatal outcome of IVF singletons versus naturally conceived in women aged 35 years and over. Arch Gynecol Obstet 284, 1411–1416 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-011-1873-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-011-1873-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation