Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Songbirds tradeoff auditory frequency resolution and temporal resolution

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Comparative Physiology A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Physical tradeoffs may in some cases constrain the evolution of sensory systems. The peripheral auditory system, for example, performs a spectral decomposition of sound that should result in a tradeoff between frequency resolution and temporal resolution. We assessed temporal resolution in three songbird species using auditory brainstem responses to paired click stimuli. Temporal resolution was greater in house sparrows (Passer domesticus) than Carolina chickadees (Poecile carolinensis) and white-breasted nuthatches (Sitta carolinensis), as predicted based on previous observations of broader auditory filters (lower frequency resolution) in house sparrows. Furthermore, within chickadees, individuals with broader auditory filters had greater temporal resolution. In contrast to predictions however, temporal resolution was similar between chickadees and nuthatches despite broader auditory filters in chickadees. These results and the results of a model simulation exploring the effect of broadened auditory filter bandwidth on temporal resolution in the auditory periphery strongly suggest that frequency resolution constrains temporal resolution in songbirds. Furthermore, our results suggest that songbirds have greater temporal resolution than some mammals, in agreement with recent behavioral studies. Species differences in temporal resolution may reflect adaptations for efficient processing of species-specific vocalizations, while individual differences within species may reflect experience-based developmental plasticity or hormonal effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ABR:

Auditory brainstem response

AEP:

Auditory evoked potential

CAP:

Compound action potential

ERB:

Equivalent rectangular bandwidth

PSTH:

Peri-stimulus time histogram

References

  • Brittan-Powell EF, Dooling RJ, Gleich O (2002) Auditory brainstem responses in adult budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus). J Acoust Soc Am 112:999–1008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bruce IC, Sachs MB, Young ED (2003) An auditory-periphery model of the effects of acoustic trauma on auditory nerve responses. J Acoust Soc Am 113:369–388

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Caras ML, Brenowitz E, Rubel EW (2010) Peripheral auditory processing changes seasonally in Gambel’s white-crowned sparrow. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol 196:581–599

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Collin SP, Davies WL, Hart NS, Hunt DM (2009) The evolution of early vertebrate photoreceptors. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 364:2925–2940

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • de Boer E (1996) Mechanics of the cochlea: modeling efforts. In: Dallos P, Popper AN, Fay RR (eds) The cochlea. Springer, New York, pp 258–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Dmitrieva LP, Gottlieb G (1994) Influence of auditory experience on the development of brain-stem auditory evoked potentials in mallard duck embryos and hatchlings. Behav Neural Biol 61:19–28

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dooling RJ, Leek MR, Gleich O, Dent ML (2002) Auditory temporal resolution in birds: discrimination of harmonic complexes. J Acoust Soc Am 112:748–759

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eggermont JJ, Spoor A (1973) Masking of action potentials in the guinea pig cochlea, its relation to adaptation. Audiology 12:221–241

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Feng AS, Narins PM, Xu C, Lin W, Yu Z, Qiu Q, Xu Z, Shen J (2006) Ultrasonic communication in frogs. Nature 440:333–336

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fullard JH, ter Hofstede HM, Ratcliffe JM, Pollack GS, Brigidi GS, Tinghitella RM, Zuk M (2010) Release from bats: genetic distance and sensoribehavioural regression in the Pacific field cricket, Teleogryllus oceanicus. Naturwissenschaften 97:53–61

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gall MD, Lucas JR (2010) Sex differences in auditory filters of brown-headed cowbirds. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol 196:559–567

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hall JW (2007) New handbook of auditory evoked responses. Pearson Education, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry KS, Lucas JR (2008) Coevolution of auditory sensitivity and temporal resolution with acoustic signal space in three songbirds. Anim Behav 76:1659–1671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henry KS, Lucas JR (2009) Vocally correlated seasonal auditory variation in the house sparrow (Passer domesticus). J Exp Biol 212:3817–3822

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Henry KS, Lucas JR (2010a) Habitat-related differences in the frequency selectivity of auditory filters in songbirds. Funct Ecol 24:614–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henry KS, Lucas JR (2010b) Auditory sensitivity and the frequency selectivity of auditory filters in the Carolina chickadee (Poecile carolinensis). Anim Behav 80:497–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joris PX, Schreiner CE, Rees A (2004) Neural processing of amplitude-modulated sounds. Physiol Rev 84:541–577

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klump GM, Gleich O (1991) Gap detection in the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris). III. Processing in the peripheral auditory system. J Comp Physiol A 168:469–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konishi M (1973) How owl tracks its prey. Am Sci 61:414–424

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishnan A, Gandour JT, Bidelman GM (2010) The effects of tone language experience on pitch processing in the brainstem. J Neurolinguistics 23:81–95

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lohr B, Nowicki S, Weisman R (1991) Pitch production in Carolina chickadee songs. Condor 93:197–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lohr B, Dooling RJ, Bartone S (2006) The discrimination of temporal fine structure in call-like harmonic sounds by birds. J Comp Psychol 120:239–251

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lowther PE, Cink CL (2006) House sparrow (Passer domesticus). In: Poole A (ed) The birds of North America online. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas JR, Freeberg TM (2007) Information and the chick-a-dee call: communicating with a complex vocal system. In: Otter K (ed) Ecology and behavior of chickadees and titmice. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 199–213

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas JR, Freeberg TM, Krishnan A, Long GR (2002) A comparative study of avian auditory brainstem responses: correlations with phylogeny and vocal complexity, and seasonal effects. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol 188:981–992

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas JR, Freebeg TM, Egbert J, Schwabl H (2006) Fecal corticosterone, body mass, and caching rates of Carolina chickadees (Poecile carolinensis) from disturbed and undisturbed sites. Horm Behav 49:634–643

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas JR, Freeberg TM, Long GR, Krishnan A (2007) Seasonal variation in avian auditory evoked responses to tones: a comparative analysis of Carolina chickadees, tufted titmice, and white-breasted nuthatches. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol 192:201–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Marean GC, Burt JM, Beecher MD, Rubel EW (1998) Auditory perception following hair cell regeneration in European starling (Sturnus vulgaris): frequency and temporal resolution. J Acoust Soc Am 103:3567–3580

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moore BCJ (1993) Frequency analysis and pitch perception. In: Yost WA, Popper AN, Fay RR (eds) Human psychophysics. Springer, New York, pp 58–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Musacchia G, Sams M, Skoe E, Kraus N (2007) Musicians have enhanced subcortical auditory and audiovisual processing of speech and music. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:15894–15898

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Noirot IC, Adler HJ, Cornil CA, Harada N, Dooling RJ, Balthazart J, Ball GF (2009) Presence of aromatase and estrogen receptor alpha in the inner ear of zebra finches. Hear Res 252:49–55

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ohashi T, Ochi K, Nishino H, Kenmochi M, Yoshida K (2005) Recovery of human compound action potential using a paired-click to stimulus paradigm. Hear Res 203:192–200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Okanoya K, Dooling RJ (1990) Minimum detectable gap in noise as a function of intensity and frequency for two avian species, budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulates) and zebra finches (Poephila guttata). Hear Res 50:185–192

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parham K, Zhao HB, Kim DO (1996) Responses of auditory nerve fibers of the unanesthetized decerebrate cat to click pairs as simulated echoes. J Neurophysiol 76:17–29

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Phillmore LS, Sturdy CB, Weisman RG (2003) Does reduced social contact affect discrimination of distance cues and individual vocalizations? Anim Behav 65:911–922

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritchison G (1983) Vocalizations of the white-breasted nuthatch. Wilson Bull 95:440–451

    Google Scholar 

  • Supin AY, Popov VV (1995) Temporal resolution in the dolphin’s auditory system revealed by double-click evoked potential study. J Acoust Soc Am 97:2586–2593

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Viemeister NF, Plack CJ (1993) Time analysis. In: Yost WA, Popper AN, Fay RR (eds) Human psychophysics. Springer, New York, pp 116–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Wadhwa S, Anand P, Bhowmick D (1999) Quantitative study of plasticity in the auditory nuclei of chick under conditions of prenatal sound attenuation and overstimulation with species specific and musical stimuli. Int J Dev Neurosci 17:239–253

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walton JP, Barsz K, Wilson WW (2008) Sensorineural hearing loss and neural correlates of temporal acuity in the inferior colliculus of the C57BL/6 mouse. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 9:90–101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wysocki LE, Ladich F (2002) Can fishes resolve temporal characteristics of sounds? New insights using auditory brainstem responses. Hear Res 169:36–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zilany MSA, Bruce IC (2006) Modeling auditory-nerve responses for high sound pressure levels in the normal and impaired auditory periphery. J Acoust Soc Am 120:1446–1466

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zilany MSA, Bruce IC (2007) Representation of the vowel (epsilon) in normal and impaired auditory nerve fibers: model predictions of responses in cats. J Acoust Soc Am 122:402–417

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zilany MSA, Carney LH (2010) Power-law dynamics in an auditory-nerve model can account for neural adaptation to sound-level statistics. J Neurosci 30:10380–10390

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zilany MSA, Bruce IC, Nelson PC, Carney LH (2009) A phenomenological model of the synapse between the inner hair cell and auditory nerve: long-term adaptation with power-law dynamics. J Acoust Soc Am 126:2390–2412

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Animal protocols were approved by the Purdue Animal Care and Use committee (# 05–058). K. S. Henry was supported by a research grant from Purdue University and the A. A. Lindsey Graduate Fellowship in Ecology. We thank R. Krishnan for the use of his auditory test equipment.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Purdue University, 500 Oval Drive, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA

    Kenneth S. Henry & Gavin M. Bidelman

  2. Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, 915 West State Street, West Lafayette, IN, 47907-2054, USA

    Megan D. Gall & Jeffrey R. Lucas

Authors
  1. Kenneth S. Henry
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Megan D. Gall
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gavin M. Bidelman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jeffrey R. Lucas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenneth S. Henry.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Henry, K.S., Gall, M.D., Bidelman, G.M. et al. Songbirds tradeoff auditory frequency resolution and temporal resolution. J Comp Physiol A 197, 351–359 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-010-0619-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-010-0619-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation