Skip to main content
Log in

Accuracy of concepts in female pelvic floor anatomy: facts and myths!

  • Topic paper
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The pelvic floor is characterized by a complex morphology because different functional systems join here. Since a clear understanding of the pelvic floor region is crucial for female pelvic surgery and fundamental mechanisms of urogenital dysfunction and treatment, we here describe the accurate and functional anatomy of important pelvic structures and landmarks, clarify their terminology and point out possible errors or misunderstandings as to their existence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figs. 1–6
Figs. 7–12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aigner F, Zbar AP, Ludwikowski B, Kreczy A, Kovacs P, Fritsch H (2004) The rectogenital septum: morphology, function and clinical relevance. Dis Colon Rectum 47:131–140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Berglas B, Rubin IC (1953) Histologic study of the pelvic connective tissue. Surg Gynecol Obstet 97:277–289

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Brökelmann J (1985) Die weiblichen Geschlechtsorgane. In: Fleischhauer K (ed) Beninghoff Bd. 2 13./14. Auflage, Urban & Schwarzenberg, München

    Google Scholar 

  4. De Blok S (1982) The connective tissue of the female fetal pelvic region. Acta Morphol Neerl Scand 20:65–92

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. De Blok S (1982) The connective tissue of the adult female pelvic region. Acta Morphol Neerl Scand 20:325–346

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. DeLancey JO (2006) Anatomy. In: Cardozo L, Staskin D (eds) Textbook of female urology and urogynecology. Informa Healthcare, London, pp 115–126

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dorschner W, Stolzenburg JV, Neuhaus J (2001) Structure and function of the bladder neck. Adv Anat Embryol Cell Biol 159:1–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fritsch H (1990) Development of the rectal fascia. Anat Anz 170:273–280

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fritsch H (1992) The connective tissue sheath of uterus and vagina in the human female fetus. Ann Anat 174:261–266

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fritsch H, Lienemann A, Brenner E, Ludwikowski B (2004) Clinical anatomy of the pelvic floor. Adv Anat Embryol Cell Biol 175:1–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fritsch H, Pinggera GM, Lienemann A, Mitterberger M, Bartsch G, Strasser H (2006) What are the supportive structures of the female urethra? Neurourol Urodyn 25:128–134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fujii S, Takakura K, Matsumura N, Higuchi T, Yura S, Mandai M, Baba T, Yoshioka S (2007) Anatomic identification and functional outcomes of nerve sparing Okabayashi radical hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol 107:4–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Heald RJ (1995) Total mesorectal excision is optimal surgery for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 82:1297–1299

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Höckel M, Horn L-C, Fritsch H (2005) Local tumor spread in stage IB–IIB cervical carcinoma is confined to the mesenchymal compartment of uterovaginal organogenesis. Lancet Oncol 6:751–756

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Koster H (1933) On the supports of the uterus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 25:67–74

    Google Scholar 

  16. Otcenasek M, Baca V, Krofta L, Feyereisl J (2008) Endopelvic fascia in women: shape and relation to parietal pelvic structures. Obstet Gynecol 11:622–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pernkopf E, Pichler A (1953) Systematische und topographische Anatomie des weiblichen Beckens. In: Seitz L, Amreich J (eds) Biologie und Pathologie des Weibes Bd. 1/1. Urban & Schwarzenberg, Berlin, pp 83–194

    Google Scholar 

  18. Petros P (2007) The female pelvic floor. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  19. Petros PEP, Woodman PJ (2008) The integral theory of continence. Int Urogynecol J 19:35–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Range RL, Woodburne RT (1964) The gross and microscopic anatomy of the transverse cervical ligaments. Am J Obstet Gynecol 90:460–467

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Reisenauer C, Shiozawa T, Oppitz M, Busch C, Kirschniak A, Fehm T, Drews U (2008) The role of smooth muscle in the pathogenesis of pelvic organ prolapse- an immunohistochemical and morphometric analysis of the cervical third of the uterosacral ligament. J Pelvic Foor Dysfunct 19:383–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Richter K (1998) Gynäkologische Chirurgie des Beckenbodens. Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  23. Shiozawa T, Huebner M, Hirt B, Wallwiener D, Reisenauer C (2010) Nerve-preserving sacrocolpopexy: anatomical study and surgical approach. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 152:103–107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. TA = Federative committee on anatomical terminology (1998) Terminologia Anatomica, International Anatomical Terminology. Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tandler J (1923) Lehrbuch der systematischen Anatomie. Die Eingeweide. Bd. 2 Vogel, Leipzig

  26. Trimbos JB, Maas CP, Deruiter MC, Peters AA, Kenter GG (2001) A nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: guidelines and feasibility in Western patients. Int J Gynecol Cancer 11:180–186

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. von Peham H, Amreich J (1930) Gynäkologische Operationslehre. Karger, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Romed Hoermann for his helpful suggestions and support with the figures and tables and Claudia Siemon for carefully reading and correcting the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Fritsch.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fritsch, H., Zwierzina, M. & Riss, P. Accuracy of concepts in female pelvic floor anatomy: facts and myths!. World J Urol 30, 429–435 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-011-0777-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-011-0777-x

Keywords

Navigation