Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Morbidity associated with repeated transrectal high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment of localized prostate cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this cross-sectional study was to compare single with repeated high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) treatment in patients with localized prostate cancer, regarding treatment-related morbidity. A number of 223 consecutive patients with localized prostate cancer were treated with HIFU. Among them, 174 (78%) patients had one treatment, while 49 (22%) needed a second treatment. The patients’ status and treatment-related side effects were followed up. The complications rates after one HIFU in 223 patients were: urinary tract infection 0.4%, chronic pelvic pain 0.9%, infravesical obstruction 19.7%, stressincontinence 7.6%, impotence 49.8%. Among the 49 patients who received a second HIFU therapy, the cumulative incontinence rate (12.2%; P = 0.024) and cumulative impotence rate (55%; P < 0.001) were significantly increased. Although there is an increase in morbidity if transrectal HIFU is repeated, the risk of side effects related to additional HIFU sessions in the case of primary treatment failure is still low.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barry MJ, Fowler FJ Jr, O’Leary MP, Bruskewitz RC, Holtgrewe HL, Mebust WK et al (1992) The American Urological Association symptom index for benign prostatic hyperplasia. The Measurement Committee of the American Urological Association. J Urol 148(5):1549–1557

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Blana A, Walter B, Rogenhofer S, Wieland WF (2004) High-intensity focused ultrasound for the treatment of localized prostate cancer: 5-year experience. Urology 63(2):297–300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chaussy C, Thueroff S, Rebillard X, Gelet A (2005) Technology insight: high-intensity focused ultrasound for urologic cancers. Nat Clin Pract Urol 2(4):191–198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chaussy CG, Thuroff S (2000) High-intensive focused ultrasound in localized prostate cancer. J Endourol 14(3):293–299

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen L, ter Haar HG, Hill CR (1997) Influence of ablated tissue on the formation of high-intensity focused ultrasound lesions. Ultrasound Med Biol 6:921–931

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Curiel L, Chavrier F, Gignoux B, Pichardo S, Chesnais S, Chapelon JY (2004) Experimental evaluation of lesion prediction modelling in the presence of cavitation bubbles: intended for high-intensity focused ultrasound prostate treatment. Med Biol Eng Comput 42(1):44–54

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gelet A, Chapelon JY, Bouvier R, Pangaud C, Lasne Y (1999) Local control of prostate cancer by transrectal high intensity focused ultrasound therapy: preliminary results. J Urol 161(1):156–162

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gelet A, Chapelon JY, Bouvier R, Rouviere O, Lasne Y, Lyonnet D et al (2000) Transrectal high-intensity focused ultrasound: minimally invasive therapy of localized prostate cancer. J Endourol 14(6):519–528

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gelet A, Chapelon JY, Bouvier R, Rouviere O, Lyonnet D, Dubernard JM (2001) Transrectal high intensity focused ultrasound for the treatment of localized prostate cancer: factors influencing the outcome. Eur Urol 40(2):124–129

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gelet A, Chapelon JY, Bouvier R, Souchon R, Pangaud C, Abdelrahim AF et al (1996) Treatment of prostate cancer with transrectal focused ultrasound: early clinical experience. Eur Urol. 29(2):174–183

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Huber P, Debus J, Jenne J, Jochle K, van Kaick G, Lorenz WJ et al (1996) Therapeutic ultrasound in tumor therapy. Principles, applications and new developments. Radiologe 36(1):64–71

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lerner SE, Blute ML, Zincke H (1995) Critical evaluation of salvage surgery for radio-recurrent/resistant prostate cancer. J Urol 154(3):1103–1109

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Stamey TA (1973) Endoscopic suspension of the vesical neck for urinary incontinence. Surg Gynecol Obstet 136(4):547–554

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Stolzenburg JU, Rabenalt R, Do M, Ho K, Dorschner W, Waldkirch E et al (2005) Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: oncological and functional results after 700 procedures. J Urol 174(4 Pt 1):1271–1275

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Thuroff S, Chaussy C, Vallancien G, Wieland W, Kiel HJ, Le DA et al (2003) High-intensity focused ultrasound and localized prostate cancer: efficacy results from the European multicentric study. J Endourol 17(8):673–677

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Uchida T, Sanghvi NT, Gardner TA, Koch MO, Ishii D, Minei S et al (2002) Transrectal high-intensity focused ultrasound for treatment of patients with stage T1b-2n0m0 localized prostate cancer: a preliminary report. Urology 59(3):394–398

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wei JT, Dunn RL, Marcovich R, Montie JE, Sanda MG (2000) Prospective assessment of patient reported urinary continence after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 164(3 Pt 1):744–748

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Workshop Committee of the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Disease (NIDDK). 7-12-1995. Chronic Prostatitis Workshop, Bethesda

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Blana.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Blana, A., Rogenhofer, S., Ganzer, R. et al. Morbidity associated with repeated transrectal high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment of localized prostate cancer. World J Urol 24, 585–590 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-006-0107-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-006-0107-x

Keywords

Navigation