Skip to main content
Log in

A phase I study of oral panobinostat alone and in combination with docetaxel in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer

  • Clinical Trial Report
  • Published:
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Histone deacetylase inhibitors have demonstrated anticancer activity against a range of tumors. We aimed to define the maximum tolerated dose, toxicity, activity, and pharmacokinetics of oral panobinostat, a pan-deacetylase inhibitor, alone and in combination with docetaxel for the treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC).

Methods

Sixteen patients were enrolled, eight in each arm. Eligible patients had CRPC and adequate organ function. In arm I, oral panobinostat (20 mg) was administered on days 1, 3, and 5 for 2 consecutive weeks followed by a 1-week break. In arm II, oral panobinostat (15 mg) was administered on the same schedule in combination with docetaxel 75 mg/m2 every 21 days.

Results

Dose-limiting toxicities were grade 3 dyspnea (arm I) and grade 3 neutropenia >7 days (arm II). In arm I, all patients developed progressive disease despite accumulation of acetylated histones in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. In arm II, five of eight patients (63%) had a ≥50% decline in prostate-specific antigen (PSA), including one patient whose disease had previously progressed on docetaxel.

Conclusions

Oral panobinostat with and without docetaxel is feasible, and docetaxel had no apparent effect on the pharmacokinetics of panobinostat. Since preclinical studies suggest a dose-dependent effect of panobinostat on PSA expression, and other phase I data demonstrate that intravenous panobinostat produces higher peak concentrations (>20- to 30-fold) and area under the curve (3.5x–5x), a decision was made to focus the development of panobinostat on the intravenous formulation to treat CRPC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Rasheed W, Bishton M, Johnstone RW, Primce HM (2008) Histone deacetylase inhibitors in lymphoma and solid malignancies. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 8:413–432

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Butler LM, Agus DB, Scher HI, Higgins B, Rose A, Cordon-Cardo C, Thaler HT, Rifkind RA, Marks PA, Richon VM (2000) Suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid, an inhibitor of histone deacetylase, suppresses the growth of prostate cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. Cancer Res 60:5165–5170

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Qian DZ, Kato Y, Shabbeer S, Wei Y, Verheul HM, Salumbides B, Sanni T, Atadja P, Pili R (2006) Targeting tumor angiogenesis with histone deacetylase inhibitors: the hydroxamic acid derivative LBH589. Clin Cancer Res 12:634–642

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kulp SK, Chen CS, Wang DS, Cheng CY, Chen CS (2006) Antitumor effects of a novel phenylbutyrate-based histone deacetylase inhibitor, (S)-HDAC-42, in prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res 12:5199–5206

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kuefer R, Hofer MD, Altug V, Zorn C, Genze F, Kunzi-Rapp K, Hautmann RE, Gschwend JE (2004) Sodium butyrate and tributyrin induce in vivo growth inhibition and apoptosis in human prostate cancer. Br J Cancer 90:535–541

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen L, Meng S, Wang H, Bali P, Bai W, Li B, Atadja P, Bhalla KN, Wu J (2005) Chemical ablation of androgen receptor in prostate cancer cells by the histone deacetylase inhibitor LAQ824. Mol Cancer Ther 4:1311–1319

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Shao W, Growney J, O’Connor G, Feng Y, Scher H, Yao Y, Fawell S, Atadja P (2008) Efficacy of panobinostat (LBH589) in prostate cancer cell models: targeting the androgen receptor in hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). Presented at the Genitourinary Cancers Symposium, San Francisco

  8. Giles F, Fischer T, Cortes J, Garcia-Manero G, Beck J, Ravandi F, Masson E, Rae P, Laird G, Sharma S, Kantarjian H, Dugan M, Albitar M, Bhalla K (2006) A phase I study of intravenous LBH589, a novel cinnamic hydroxamic acid analogue histone deacetylase inhibitor, in patients with refractory hematologic malignancies. Clin Cancer Res 12:4628–4635

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Prince HM, George D, Patnaik A et al (2007) Phase I study of oral panobinostat (LBH589) in advanced solid tumors and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Presented at the ECCO Poster, Barcelona, Spain, September 23–27, 2007 (abstr 701)

  10. Sharma S, Vogelzang N, Beck J et al (2007) Phase I pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of once-weekly i.v. panobinostat (LBH589). Presented at the ECCO Poster, Barcelona, Spain, September 23–27, 2007 (abstr 702)

  11. Scher HI, Morris MJ, Kelly WK, Schwartz LH, Heller G (2005) Prostate cancer clinical trial end points: “RECIST”ing a step backwards. Clin Cancer Res 11:5223–5232

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Babb J, Rogatko A, Zacks S (1998) Cancer phase I clinical trials: efficient dose escalation with overdose control. Stat Med 17:1103–1120

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cristofanilli M, Budd GT, Ellis MJ, Stopeck A, Matera J, Miller MC, Reuben JM, Doyle GV, Allard WJ, Terstappan LW, Hayes DF (2004) Circulating tumor cells, disease progression, and survival in metastatic breast cancer. N Engl J Med 351:781–791

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Danila DC, Heller G, Gignac GA, Gonzalez-Espinoza R, Anand A, Tanaka E, Lilja H, Schwartz L, Larson S, Fleisher M, Scher HI (2007) Circulating tumor cell number and prognosis in progressive castration-resistant prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res 13:7053–7058

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Young H, Baum R, Cremerius U, Herholz K, Hoekstra O, Lammertsma AA, Pruim J, Price P (1999) Measurement of clinical and subclinical tumour response using [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography: review and 1999 EORTC recommendations. European organization for research and treatment of cancer (EORTC) PET study group. Eur J Cancer 35:1773–1782

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Minn H, Zasadny KR, Quint LE, Wahl RL (1995) Lung cancer: reproducibility of quantitative measurements for evaluating 2-[F-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose uptake at PET. Radiology 196:167–173

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Weber WA, Ziegler SI, Thödtmann R, Hanauske AR, Schwaiger M (1999) Reproducibility of metabolic measurements in malignant tumors using FDG PET. J Nucl Med 40:1771–1777

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kelloff GJ, Krohn KA, Larson SM, Weissleder R, Mankoff DA, Hoffman JM, Link JM, Guyton KZ, Eckelman WC, Scher HI, O’Shaughnessy J, Cheson BD, Sigman CC, Tatum JL, Mills GQ, Sullivan DC, Woodcock J (2005) The progress and promise of molecular imaging probes in oncologic drug development. Clin Cancer Res 11:7967–7985

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tannock IF, de Wit R, Berry WR, Horti J, Pluzanska A, Chi KN, Oudard S, Théodore C, James ND, Turesson I, Rosenthal MA, Eisenberger MA, TAX 327 Investigators (2004) Docetaxel plus prednisone or mitoxantrone plus prednisone for advanced prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 351:1502–1512

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. de Bono JS, Scher HI, Montgomery RB, Parker C, Miller MC, Tissing H, Doyle GV, Terstappen LW, Pienta KJ, Raghavan D (2008) Circulating tumor cells predict survival benefit from treatment in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res 14:6302–6309

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rokhlin OW, Glover RB, Guseva NV, Taghiyev AF, Kohlgraf KG, Cohen MB (2006) Mechanisms of cell death induced by histone deacetylase inhibitors in androgen receptor-positive prostate cancer cells. Mol Cancer Res 4:113–123

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tomlins SA, Mehra R, Rhodes DR et al (2006) TMPRSS2: ETV4 gene fusions define a third molecular subtype of prostate cancer. Cancer Res 66:3396–3400

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Welsbie DS, Xu J, Chen Y et al (2009) Histone deacetylases are required for androgen receptor function in hormone-sensitive and castrate-resistant prostate cancer. Cancer Res 69:958–966

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Scher HI, Halabi S, Tannock I, Morris M, Sternberg CN, Carducci MA et al (2008) Design and end points of clinical trials for patients with progressive prostate cancer and castrate levels of testosterone: recommendations of the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group. J Clin Oncol 26(7):1148–1159

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kelly WK, O’Connor OA, Krug LM et al (2005) Phase I study of an oral histone deacetylase inhibitor, suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid, in patients with advanced cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:3923–3931

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sharma S, Vogelzang NJ, Beck J et al (2007) Phase I pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) study of LBH589, a novel deacetylase (DAC) inhibitor given intravenously on a new once weekly schedule. J Clin Oncol, 2007 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings Part I. Vol 25, No. 18S (June 20, 2007, Supplement) (abstr 14019)

  27. Zanzonico PB, Finn R, Pentlow KS et al (2004) PET-based radiation dosimetry in man of 18F-fluorodihydrotestosterone, a new radiotracer for imaging prostate cancer. J Nucl Med 45:1966–1971

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Larson SM, Morris M, Gunther I et al (2004) Tumor localization of 16beta-18F-fluoro-5alpha-dihydrotestosterone versus 18F-FDG in patients with progressive, metastatic prostate cancer. J Nucl Med 45:366–373

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Novartis; the Department of Defense Prostate Cancer Research Program (PC051382) and the Prostate Cancer Foundation; and the Sidney Kimmel Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declared no financial conflicts of interest beyond the aforementioned funding. The authors have full control of all primary data and agree to allow the journal to review their data if requested.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dana Rathkopf.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rathkopf, D., Wong, B.Y., Ross, R.W. et al. A phase I study of oral panobinostat alone and in combination with docetaxel in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 66, 181–189 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-010-1289-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-010-1289-x

Keywords

Navigation