Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Bone marrow angiogenesis in multiple myeloma and its correlation with clinicopathological factors

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Hematology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Increased angiogenesis has been found to be an adverse prognostic factor in solid tumors but evidences show that angiogenesis also plays an important role in hematological malignancies including multiple myeloma (MM). In this report we studied the various angiogenesis parameters like microvessel density (MVD) and total vascular area (TVA), on bone marrow biopsies in 50 newly diagnosed cases of MM. The aim was to study bone marrow angiogenesis in MM using light microscopy (MVD-A) and computerized image analyzer (MVD-B and TVA) and correlate it with clinical features, laboratory findings, histological features, and response to treatment on follow-up. Bone marrow biopsies of test cases (n = 50) were immunohistochemically stained with CD34 for visualization of microvessels. MVD-A (range 8–80; mean 50.4; SD 17.5), MVD-B (5.2–33.2; mean 16.3; SD 5.1), and TVA in percentage (range 0.42–7.20; mean 2.8; SD 1.5) were measured. Ten age- and sex-matched controls were studied and their parameters were taken as grade I. There was a significant correlation between these angiogenesis parameters (MVD-A vs MVD-B, Pearson’s correlation coefficient (pcc) = 0.724; MVD-A vs TVA, pcc = 0.370; MVD-B vs TVA, pcc = 0.406). The angiogenesis was significantly higher in cases as compared to controls. Patients with residual disease had a higher MVD as compared to the complete responders. High tumor burden and diffuse pattern of infiltration were also associated with grade III MVD and TVA. Hence, it can be concluded that angiogenesis correlates with other histological features associated with prognosis and is also a good predictor for complete response in patients with multiple myeloma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Carmeliet P (2003) Angiogenes in health and disease. Nat Med 9:653–660

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Moehler TM, Neben K, Ho AD, Goldschmidt H (2001) Angiogenesis in hematologic malignancies. Ann Hematol 80:695–705

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dispenzieri A, Lacy MQ, Greipp PR (2001) Multiple myeloma in Winterobe’s clinical hematology, vol 2, 11th edn. Lipincott, Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 2583–2636

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sezer O, Niemöller K, Eucker J, Jakob C, Kaufmann O, Zavrski I, Dietel M, Possinger M (2000) Bone marrow microvessel density is a prognostic factor for survival in patients with multiple myeloma. Ann Haematol 79:574–577

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fox SB, Leek RD, Weekes MP, Whitehouse RM, Gatter KC, Harris AL (1995) Quantitation and prognostic value of breast cancer angiogenesis: comparison of microvessel density. Chalkley count, and computer image analysis. J Pathol 177:275–283

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rajkumar SV, Leong T, Roche PC (2000) Prognostic value of bone marrow angiogenesis in multiple myeloma. Clin Cancer Res 6:3111–3116

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bhatti SS, Kumar L, Dinda AK, Dawar R (2006) Prognostic value of bone marrow angiogenesis in multiple myeloma: use of light microscopy as well as computerized image analyzer in the assessment of microvessel density and total vascular area in multiple myeloma and its correlation with various clinical, histological, and laboratory parameters. Am J Hematol 81:649–656

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bartl R, Frisch B, Fateh Moghadam A et al (1987) Histologic classification and staging of multiple myeloma: a retrospective and prospective study of 674 cases. Am J Clin Pathol 87:342–355

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Vacca A, Ribatti D, Roccaro AM, Frigeri A, Dammacco F (2001) Bone marrow angiogenesis in patients with active multiple myeloma. Semin Oncol 28:543–550

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rajkumar SV, Witzig TE, Gertz MA, Griepp PR (1998) Computerized image analysis in the assessment of bone marrow angiogenesis in multiple myeloma. Blood 92suppI:100a

    Google Scholar 

  11. Vacca A, Ribatti D, Roncali L, Ranieri G, Serio G, Silvestris F, Dammacco F (1994) Bone marrow angiogenesis and progression in multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol 87:503–508

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Munshi N, Wilson CS, Penn J, Epstein J, Singhal S, Hough A, Sanderson R, Desikan R, Seigel D, Mehta J, Barlogie B (1998) Angiogenesis in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: poor prognosis with increased microvessel density in bone marrow biopsies (abstract). Blood 92(Suppl 1):98a

    Google Scholar 

  13. Singhal S, Mehta J, Desikan R, Ayers D, Robertson P, Eddlemen P, Munshi N, Anaissie E, Wilson C, Dhodapkar M, Zeldis J, Barlogie B (1999) N Eng J Med 341:1565–1571

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Carter A, Hocherman I, Linn S, Cohen Y, Tatarsky I (1987) Prognostic significance of plasma cell morphology in multiple myeloma. Cancer 60:1060–1065

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chanchal Rana.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rana, C., Sharma, S., Agrawal, V. et al. Bone marrow angiogenesis in multiple myeloma and its correlation with clinicopathological factors. Ann Hematol 89, 789–794 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-010-0919-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-010-0919-z

Keywords

Navigation