Skip to main content
Log in

Catheter-Based Endovascular Damage-Control (CDET): Current Status and Future Directions

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Endovascular technology during the past decade has introduced innovative strategies to manage vascular trauma. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the current use catheter-based endovascular damage-control techniques (CDET) in North, Central, and South America.

Methods

A survey was sent to the presidents of local societies in Latin America, members of the board, and past presidents of the Pan-American Trauma Society. The survey was sent using the Research Electronic Data Capture collection tool.

Results

A total of 67 surveys were sent with an 85 % response rate. Surgeons from 15 countries participated in the survey. All of the centers in North America had capabilities to perform these procedures. In none of these centers, however, were they performed by trauma and acute care surgeons. In Central and South America, 64 % of the surgeons responded that they have an interventional radiology service, and in 56 % of the cases, trauma and acute care surgeons were already performing CDET. Eight-eight percent of those surveyed thought that the addition of CDET to trauma would improve patient care; 86 % would be interested in further training in this technique if such programs were available. Finally, 68 % thought that the addition of CDET would help the field of acute care surgery and trauma financially.

Conclusions

CDET is being performed already by trauma and acute care surgeons in Latin American countries. More research is necessary to evaluate the role of the trauma surgeon in the endovascular suite as well as training requirements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. du Toit DF, Lambrechts AV, Stark H, Warren BL (2008) Long-term results of stent graft treatment of subclavian artery injuries: management of choice for stable patients? J Vasc Surg 47:739–743

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kato N, Dake MD, Miller DC et al (1997) Traumatic thoracic aortic aneurysm: treatment with endovascular stent-grafts. Radiology 205:657–662

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Feliciano DV, Shackford SR (2010) Vascular injury: 50th anniversary year review article of The Journal of Trauma. J Trauma 68:1009–1013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Reuben BC, Whitten MG, Sarfati M, Kraiss LW (2007) Increasing use of endovascular therapy in acute arterial injuries: analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank. J Vasc Surg 46:1222–1226

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Demetriades D, Velmahos GC, Scalea TM et al (2009) Blunt traumatic thoracic aortic injuries: early or delayed repair—results of an American Association for the Surgery of Trauma prospective study. J Trauma 66:967–973

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Demetriades D, Velmahos GC, Scalea TM et al (2008) Diagnosis and treatment of blunt thoracic aortic injuries: changing perspectives. J Trauma 64:1415–1418

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Demetriades D, Velmahos GC, Scalea TM et al (2008) Operative repair or endovascular stent graft in blunt traumatic thoracic aortic injuries: results of an American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Multicenter Study. J Trauma 64:561–570

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Karmy-Jones R, Ferrigno L, Teso D, Long WB III, Shackford S (2011) Endovascular repair compared with operative repair of traumatic rupture of the thoracic aorta: a nonsystematic review and a plea for trauma-specific reporting guidelines. J Trauma 71:1059–1072

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG (2009) Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 42:377–381

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rotondo MF, Schwab CW, McGonigal MD et al (1993) “Damage control”: an approach for improved survival in exsanguinating penetrating abdominal injury. J Trauma 35:375–382

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bickell WH, Wall MJ Jr, Pepe PE et al (1994) Immediate versus delayed fluid resuscitation for hypotensive patients with penetrating torso injuries. N Engl J Med 331:1105–1109

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. O’Malley E, Boyle E, O’Callaghan A, Coffey JC, Walsh SR (2013) Role of laparoscopy in penetrating abdominal trauma: a systematic review. World J Surg 37(1):113–122

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Abolhoda A, Livingston DH, Donahoo JS, Allen K (1997) Diagnostic and therapeutic video assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) following chest trauma. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 12:356–360

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ferrada P, Anand RJ, Whelan J et al (2012) Qualitative assessment of the inferior vena cava: useful tool for the evaluation of fluid status in critically ill patients. Am Surg 78:468–470

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ferrada P, Anand RJ, Whelan J et al (2011) Limited transthoracic echocardiogram: so easy any trauma attending can do it. J Trauma 71:1327–1331

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rozycki GS, Ochsner MG, Schmidt JA et al (1995) A prospective study of surgeon-performed ultrasound as the primary adjuvant modality for injured patient assessment. J Trauma 39:492–498

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rozycki GS, Ballard RB, Feliciano DV, Schmidt JA, Pennington SD (1998) Surgeon-performed ultrasound for the assessment of truncal injuries: lessons learned from 1540 patients. Ann Surg 228:557–567

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dente CJ, Feliciano DV (2011) Torso vascular trauma at an urban level-I trauma center. Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther 23:36–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Goaley TJ, Dente CJ, Feliciano DV (2006) Torso vascular trauma at an urban level I trauma center. Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther 18:102–112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sullivan PS, Dente CJ, Patel S et al (2010) Outcome of ligation of the inferior vena cava in the modern era. Am J Surg 199:500–506

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Peitzman AB (2008) Status of trauma and acute care surgery in the United States. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 14:1–4

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ball CG, Kirkpatrick AW, Rajani RR et al (2009) Temporary intravascular shunts: when are we really using them according to the NTDB? Am Surg 75:605–607

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Dente CJ, Shaz BH, Nicholas JM et al (2009) Improvements in early mortality and coagulopathy are sustained better in patients with blunt trauma after institution of a massive transfusion protocol in a civilian level I trauma center. J Trauma 66:1616–1624

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Dente CJ, Shaz BH, Nicholas JM et al (2010) Early predictors of massive transfusion in patients sustaining torso gunshot wounds in a civilian level I trauma center. J Trauma 68:298–304

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Morse BC, Dente CJ, Hodgman EI et al (2012) Outcomes after massive transfusion in nontrauma patients in the era of damage control resuscitation. Am Surg 78:679–684

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Subramanian A, Vercruysse G, Dente C, Wyrzykowski A, King E, Feliciano DV (2008) A decade’s experience with temporary intravascular shunts at a civilian level I trauma center. J Trauma 65:316–324

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ordonez CA, Puyana JC (2006) Management of peritonitis in the critically ill patient. Surg Clin North Am 86:1323–1349

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ordonez CA, Pino LF, Tejada JW et al (2012) Experience of two first level hospitals in the southwest region of Colombia on the implementation of the Pan-American Trauma Society International Trauma Registry. Rev Col Bras Cir 39:255–262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Aboutanos MB, Jordan A, Cohen R et al (2011) Brief violence interventions with community case management services are effective for high-risk trauma patients. J Trauma 71:228–236

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Aboutanos MB, Rodas EB, Aboutanos SZ et al (2007) Trauma education and care in the jungle of Ecuador, where there is no advanced trauma life support. J Trauma 62:714–719

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Frankel HL, Butler KL, Cuschieri J et al (2012) The role and value of surgical critical care, an essential component of acute care surgery, in the affordable care act: a report from the Critical Care Committee and Board of Managers of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 73:20–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

P.F. and R.I. conceived of and designed this study. P.F. collected and assembled the data. P.F., R.I, M.A and R.J.A. analyzed the data, which P.F. and R.J.A. interpreted. All authors participated in writing the manuscript. Thank you to Dr Lina V Mata for her help setting up the survey.

Disclosures

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paula Ferrada.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ferrada, P., Anand, R.J., Aboutanos, M. et al. Catheter-Based Endovascular Damage-Control (CDET): Current Status and Future Directions. World J Surg 38, 330–334 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2263-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2263-7

Keywords

Navigation