Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Groin Hernia Repair: Anesthesia

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The choice of anesthesia for groin hernia repair is between general, regional (epidural or spinal), and local anesthesia. Existing data from large consecutive patient series and randomized studies have shown local anesthesia to be the method of choice because it can be performed by the surgeon, does not necessarily require an attending anesthesiologist, translates into the shortest recovery (bypassing the postanesthesia care unit), has the lowest cost, and has the lowest postoperative morbidity regarding risk of urinary retention. Spinal anesthesia has no documented benefits for this small operation and should be avoided owing to the risk of rare neurologic side effects and the high risk of urinary retention. General anesthesia with short-acting agents may be a valid alternative when combined with local infiltration anesthesia, although an anesthesiologist is required. Despite sufficient scientific data to support the choice of anesthesia, large epidemiologic and nationwide information from databases show an undesirable high (about 10–20%) use of spinal anesthesia and low (about 10%) use of local infiltration anesthesia. Surgeons and anesthesiologists should therefore adjust their anesthesia practices to fit the available scientific evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kingsnorth A, LeBlanc K. 2003. Hernias: inguinal, incisional Lancet. 362:1561–1571

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Aasvang E, Kehlet H. Chronic postoperative pain: the case of inguinal herniorrhaphy. Br J Anaesth 2005 (in press)

  3. Hair A, Duffy K, Mclean J, et al. 2000. Groin hernia repair in Scotland Br. J. Surg. 87:1722–1726

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nordin P, Haapaniemi S, van Der Linden W, et al. 2004. Choice of anesthesja and risk of reoperation for recurrence in groin hernia repair Ann. Surg. 240:187–192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bay-Nielsen M, Kehlet H, Strand L, et al. 2001. Quality assessment of 26,304 herniorrhaphies in Denmark; a nationwide questionnaire study Lancet, 358:1124–1128

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kehlet H, Bay-Nielsen M. Anaesthetic practice for groin hernia repair: a nationwide study in Denmark 1998–2003. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2005 49: 143–146

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kark AE, Kurzer MN, Belsham PA. 1998. 3175 Primary inguinal hernia repairs: advantages of ambulatory open mesh repair using local anesthesia J. Am. Coll. Surg. 186:447–455

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Amid PK, Schulman AG, Lichtenstein IL. 1994. Local anesthesia for inguinal hernia repair: step-by-step procedure Ann. Surg. 220:735–737

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Glassow F. 1976. Short-stay surgery (Shouldice technique for repair of inguinal hernia) Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 58:133–139

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Callesen T, Bech K, Kehlet H. 2001. One-thousand consecutive inguinal hernia repairs under unmonitored local anesthesia Anesth. Analg. 93:1373–1376

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kingsnorth AN, Bowley DMG, Porter C. 2003. A prospective study of 1000 hernias: results of the Plymouth Hernia Service Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 85:18–22

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Robbins AW, Rutkow IM. 1998. Mesh plug repair and groin hernia surgery Surg. Clin. North Am. 78:1007–1023

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kehlet H, White PF. 2001. Optimizing anesthesia for inguinal hemiorrhaphy: general, regional or local anesthesia? Anesth. Analg. 93:1367–1369

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Heidemann Andersen F, Nielsen K, et al. combined ileoinguinal blockade and infiltration anaesthesia for inguinal hemiorrhaphy. Br. J. Anaesth. 2005 94: 520–523

    Google Scholar 

  15. Callesen T, Bech K, Kehlet H. 2001. Feasibility of local infiltration anaesthesia for recurrent groin hernia repair Eur. J. Surg. 167:851–854

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jensen P, Mikkelsen T, Kehlet H. 2002. Postherniorrhaphy urinary retention: effect of local, regional and general anesthesia; a review Reg. Anesth. Pain Med. 27:612–617

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nordin P, Zetterström H, Gunnarsson U, et al. 2003. Local, regional or general anaesthesia in groin hernia repair: multicentre randomised trial Lancet 362:853–858

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Özgün H, Kurt MN, Kurt I, et al. 2002. Comparison of local, spinal and general anaesthesia for inguinal hemiorrhaphy Eur. J. Surg. 168:455–459

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gönüllü NN, Cubukcu A, Alponat A. 2002. Comparison of local and general anesthesia in tension-free (Lichtenstein) hernioplasty: a prospective randomized trial Hernia 6:29–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Aasbø V, Thuen A, Ræder J. 2002. Improved long-lasting postoperative analgesia, recovery function and patient satisfaction after inguinal hernia repair with inguinal field block compared with general anesthesia Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand. 46:647–678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Song D, Greilich B, White PF, et al. 2000. Recovery profiles and costs of anesthesia for outpatient unilateral inguinal herniorrhaphy Anesth. Analg. 91:876–881

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Nordin P, Hernell H, Unosson M, et al. 2004. Type of anaesthesia and patient acceptance in groin hernia repair: a multicentre randomised trial Hernia 8:220–225

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. O’Dwyer P, Serpell MG, Millar K, et al. 2003. Local or general anesthesia for open hernia repair: a randomised trial Ann. Surg. 237:574–579

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kendell J, Wildsmith JAW, Gray IG. 2000. Costing anaesthetic practice; an economic comparison of regional and general anaesthesia for varicose vein and inguinal hernia surgery Anaesthesia 55:1106–1126

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Callesen T, Bech K, Kehlet H. 1998. The feasibility, safety and cost of infiltration anaesthesia for hernia repair Anaesthesia 53:31–35

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sørensen LT, Friis E, Jørgensen T, et al. 2002. Smoking is a risk factor for recurrence of groin hernia World J. Surg. 26:397–400

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kingsnorth AN, Britton BJ, Morris BJ. 1981. Recurrent inguinal hernia after local anaesthetic repair Br. J. Surg. 68:273–275

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Møiniche S, Kehlet H, Dahl JB. 2002. A qualitative and quantitative systematic review of pre-emptive analgesia for postoperative pain relief: the role of timing of analgesia Anesthesiology 96:725–741

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Klein SM, Pietrobon R, Nielsen KC, et al. 2002. Paravertebral somatic nerve block compared with peripheral nerve blocks for outpatient inguinal herniorrhaphy Reg. Anesth. Pain Med. 27:476–480

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Moen V, Dahlgren N, Irestedt L. 2004. Severe neurological complications after central neuraxial blockades in Sweden 1990–1999 Anesthesiology 101:950–959

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mulroy MF, Burgess FW, Emanuelsson BM. 1999. Ropivacaine 0.25% and 0.5%, but not 0.125% provide effective wound infiltration analgesia after outpatient hernia repair, but with sustained plasma drug levels Reg. Anesth. Pain Med. 24:136–141

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kehlet H, Dahl JB. 2003. Spinal anaesthesia for inguinal hernia repair? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 47:1–2

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This study was supported by a grant from The Lundbeck Foundation and Danish Research Council 22-01-0160.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Section of Surgical Pathophysiology 4074, The Juliane Marie Centre, Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark

    Henrik Kehlet M.D. Ph.D. & Eske Aasvang M.D.

Authors
  1. Henrik Kehlet M.D. Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Eske Aasvang M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Henrik Kehlet M.D. Ph.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kehlet, H., Aasvang, E. Groin Hernia Repair: Anesthesia. World J. Surg. 29, 1058–1061 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-7969-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-7969-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation