Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Implications of Land Use/Land Cover Change in the Buffer Zone of a National Park in the Tropical Andes

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The impacts of land use and land cover (LULC) change in buffer zones surrounding protected ecological reserves have important implications for the management and conservation of these protected areas. This study examines the spatial and temporal patterns of LULC change along the boundary of Rio Abiseo National Park in the Northern Peruvian Andes. Landscape change within four ecological zones was evaluated based on trends expected to occur between 1987 and 2001. Landsat TM and ETM imagery were used to produce LULC classification maps for both years using a hybrid supervised/unsupervised approach. LULC changes were measured using landscape metrics and from-to change maps created by post-classification change detection. Contrary to expectations, tropical upper wet montane forest increased despite being threatened by human-induced fires and cattle grazing of the highland grasslands inside the park. Within the park’s buffer zone, tropical moist forest remnants were fragmented into more numerous and smaller patches between 1987 and 2001; this was in part due to conversion into agricultural land. The methods used in this study provide an effective way to monitor LULC change detection and support the management of protected areas and their surrounding environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Alves D. S., J. L. G. Pereira, C. L. D. Sousa, J. V. Soares, F. Yamaguchi. 1999. Characterizing landscape changes in central Rondonia using Landsat TM imagery. International Journal of Remote Sensing 20:2877–2883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. R., E. E. Hardy, J. T. Roach, and R. E. Witmer. 1976. A Land Use and Land Cover Classification System for Use with Remote Sensor Data. Geological Survey Professional Paper 964. United States Government Printing Office, Washington

  • APECO. 1999. Diagnostico Situacional para un Plan de Uso Publico del Sector Occidental del Parque Nacional Rio Abiseo y Zonas de Influencia. Asociación Peruana para la Conservación de la Naturaleza. PROFONANPE, Lima, Peru

  • Armenteras D., F. Gast, H. Villareal. 2003. Andean forest fragmentation and the representativeness of protected natural areas in the eastern Andes, Colombia. Biological Conservation 113:245–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker W. L. 1989. Landscape ecology and nature reserve design in the boundary water canoe area, Minnesota. Ecology 70:23–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker W. L. 1992. The landscape ecology of large disturbances in the design and management of nature reserves. Landscape Ecology 7:181–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker W. L., R. L. Knight. 2000. Roads and forest fragmentation in the southern Rocky Mountains. In R. L. Knight, F. W. Smith, S. W. Buskirk, W. H. Romme, W. L. Baker (eds.), Forest fragmentation in the Southern Rocky Mountains. University Press of Colorado, Boulder. Pages 97–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonta M. 2005. Becoming-forest, becoming-local: Transformations of a protected area in Hondouras. Geoforum 36: 95–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brashares J. S., P. Arcese, M. K. Sam. 2001. Human demography and reserve size predict wildlife extinction in West Africa. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 268: 2473–2478

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bruner A. G., R. E. Gullison, R. E. Rice, G. A. B. da. Fonseca. 2001. Effectiveness of parks in protecting tropical biodiversity. Science 291:125–128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Byers A. C. 2000. Contemporary landscape change in the Huascaran National Park and Buffer Zone, Cordillera Blanca, Peru. Mountain Research and Development 20:52–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Chape, S., S. Blyth, P. Fox and M. Spalding. 2003. United Nations List of Protected Areas. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK and UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, UK

  • Colby J. D., P. L. Keating. 1998. Land cover classification using Landsat TM imagery in the tropical highlands: the influence of anisotropic reflectance. International Journal of Remote Sensing 19:1479–1500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Congalton R. G. 1991. A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing of Environment 37:35–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Congalton R. G., K. Green. 1999. Assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data : principles and practices. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • DeFries R., A. Hansen, A. C. Newton, M. C. Hansen. 2005. Increasing isolation of protected areas in tropical forests over the past twenty years. Ecological Applications 15:19–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Elumnoh A., R. P. Shrestha. 2000. Application of DEM data to Landsat image classification: Evaluation in a tropical wet-dry landscape of Thailand. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 66:297–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans T. P., A. Manire, F. De Castro, E. Brondizio, S. McCracken. 2001. A dynamic model of household decision making and parcel level landcover change in the eastern Amazon. Ecological Modeling 143:95–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Figueroa, C., A. Joaquina, J. Guerra, and K. Casas. 2000. Informe final del Estudio Socioeconomico y de uso de recursos de la poplacion aledana al Parque Nacional del Rio Abiseo: Monitoreo y Modelizacion de los Impactos de los Cambios de las Politicas Gubernamentales para la Conservacion de la Biodiversidad en Los Andes. APECO/BIOANDES, Lima

  • Flather C. H., M. S. Knowles, I. A. Kendall. 1998. Threatened and endangered species geography: Characteristics of hot spots in the conterminous United States. BioScience 48:365–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foody G. M. 2002. Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment. Remote Sensing of Environment. 80:185–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forman R. T. T., M. Godron. 1986. Landscape Ecology. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman R. E., E. H. Stanley, M. G. Turner. 2003. Analysis and conservation implications of landscape change in the Wisconsin River floodplain, USA. Ecological Applications 13:416–431

    Google Scholar 

  • Frohn R. C. 1998. Remote sensing for Landscape Ecology: New Metric Indicators for Monitoring, Modeling, and Assessment of Ecosystems. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • Gade D. W. 1973. Environment and disease in the land use and settlement of Apurimac department, Peru. Geoforum 16:37–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groom B., D. B. Jensen, R. L. Knight, S. Gatewood, L. Mills, D. Boyd-Heger, L. S. Mills, M. E. Soule. 1999. Buffer zones: Benefits and dangers of compatible stewardship. In M. E. Soule, J. Terborgh (eds.), Continental conservation: Scientific foundations of regional reserve networks. Island Press, Washington, D.C. Pages 171–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen A. J., J. J. Rotella. 2001. Biophysical factors, land use, and species viability in and around nature reserves. Conservation Biology 16:1112–1122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen A. J., R. DeFries, W. Turner. 2004. Land use change and biodiversity: a synthesis of rates and consequences during the period of satellite imagery. In G. Gutman, C. Justice (eds.), Land change science: Observing, monitoring, and understanding trajectories of change on the earth’s surface. Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York, NY. Pages 277–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargis C. D., J. A. Bissonette, J. L. David. 1998. The behavior of landscape metrics commonly used in the study of habitat fragmentation. Landscape Ecology 13:167–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harper K. A., S. E. Macdonald, P. J. Burton, J. Chen, K. D. Brosofske, S. C. Saunders, E. S. Euskirchen, D. Roberts, M. S. Jaiteh, P. Esseen. 2005. Edge Influence on Forest Structure and Composition in Fragmented Landscapes. Conservation Biology 19:768–782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heggem D. T., C. M. Edmonds, A. C. Neale, L. Bice, K. B. Jones. 2000. A landscape ecology assessment of the Tensas River Basin. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 64:41–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helmer E. H., S. Brown, W. B. Cohen. 2000. Mapping montane tropical forest successional stage and land use with multi-date Landsat imagery. International Journal of Remote Sensing 21:2163–2183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holdridge R. L. 1967. Life Zone Ecology. Tropical Science Center, San José, Costa Rica

    Google Scholar 

  • Homewood K., E. F. Lambin, E. Coast, A. Kariuki, I. Kikula, J. Kivelia, M. Said, S. Serneels, M. Thompson. 2001. Long-term changes in Serengeti-Mara wildebeest and land cover: Pastoralism, population, or policies? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 98: 12544–12549

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hubert-Moy L., A. Cotonnec, L. Le-Du, A. Chardin, P. Perez. 2001. A comparison of parametric classification procedures of remotely sensed data applied on different landscape units. Remote Sensing of Environment 75:174–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson C. F. 1982. Techniques for combining landsat and ancillary data for classification improvement. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 48:123–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen J. R. 1996. Introductory digital image processing : A remote sensing perspective. Second Edition. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Jokisch B. D., B.M. Lair. 2003. One last stand? Forests and change on Ecuador’s Eastern Cordillera. Geographical Review 92: 235–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurance W. F., T. E. Lovejoy, H. L. Vasconcelos, E. M. Buruna, R. K. Didham, P. C. Stouffer, C. Gascon, R. O. Bierregaard, S. G. Laurance, E. Sampaio. 2002. Ecosystem decay of Amazonian forest fragments: A 22-year investigation. Conservation Biology 16:605–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leo M. 1995. The importance of tropical montane cloud forest for preserving vertebrate endemism in Peru: The Rio Abiseo National Park as a case study. In L. S. Hamilton, J. O. Juvik, F. N. Scatena (eds.), Tropical montane cloud forests. Springer-Verlag, New York. Pages 198–211

    Google Scholar 

  • León, B., K. R. Young, J. Roque, and D. B. Kintz. 2001. Evaluacion de la influencia antropogenica sobre la flora y vegetación en la zona montana alta del valle del Río Abiseo, Parque Nacional Río Abiseo. Informe Final de Investigacion. APECO, Asociación Peruana para la Conservación de la Naturaleza, Lima, Peru

  • Lepers E., E. F. Lambin, A. C. Janetos, R. DeFries, F. Achard, N. Ramankutty, R. J. Scholes. 2005. A synthesis of information on rapid land-cover change for the period 1981–2000. BioScience 55:115–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynagh F. M., P. B. Urich. 2002. A critical review of buffer zone theory and practice: A Philippine case study. Society and Natural Resources 15:129–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGarigal, K., and B. J. Marks. 1995. FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. General Technical Report, US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service

  • McGarigal K., W. H. Romme, M. Crist, E. Roworth. 2001. Cumulative effects of roads and logging on landscape structure in the San Juan Mountains, Colorado (USA). Landscape Ecology 16:327–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messina, J. P., K. A. Crews-Meyer, and S. J. Walsh. 2000. Scale-dependent pattern metrics and panel data analysis as applied in a multiphase hybrid land cover classification scheme. Proceedings 2000 ASPRS Annual Convention, Washington, D.C

  • Pontius R. G., Jr. 2000. Quantification error versus location error in comparison of categorical maps. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 66:1011–1016

    Google Scholar 

  • Pontius R. G., Jr. 2002. Statistical methods to partition effects of quantity and location during comparison of categorical maps at multiple resolutions. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 68:1041–1049

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed R. A., J. Johnson-Barnard, W. L. Baker. 1996. Contribution of roads to forest fragmentation in the Rocky Mountains. Conservation Biology 10:1098–1106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez L. O., K. R. Young. 2000. Biological diversity of Peru: Determining priority areas for conservation. Ambio 29:329–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Sala O. E., F. S. Chapin III, J. J. Armesto, R. Berlow, J. Bloomfield, R. Dirzo, E. Huber-Sanwald, L. F. Huenneke, R. B. Jackson, A. Kinzig, R. Leemans, D. Lodge, H. A. Mooney, M. Oesterheld, N. L. Poff, M. T. Sykes, B. H. Walker, M. Walker, D. H. Wall. 2000. Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 287:1770–1774

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sarmiento F. O. 2003. Anthropogenic change in the landscapes of highland Ecuador. Geographical Review 92:213–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders D. A., R. J. Hobbs, C. R. Margules. 1991. Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: A review. Conservation Biology 5:18–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schonewald-Cox C. M. 1988. Boundaries in the protection of nature reserves. BioScience 38:480–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schonewald-Cox C. M., J. W. Bayless. 1986. The boundary model: A geographical analysis of design and conservation of nature reserves. Biological Conservation 38:305–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skole D., C. Tucker. 1993. Tropical deforestation and habitat fragmentation in the Amazon: Satellite data from 1978 to 1988. Science 260:1905–1921

    Google Scholar 

  • Song C., C. E. Woodcock, K. C. Seto, M. P. Lenney, S. A. Macomber. 2001. Classification and change detection using Landsat TM data: When and how to correct atmospheric effects? Remote Sensing of Environment 75:230–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Southworth J., H. Nagendra, C. Tucker. 2002. Fragmentation of a landscape: Incorporating landscape metrics into satellite analyses of land-cover change. Landscape Research 27:253–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stotz D. F., J. W. Fitzpatrick, T. Parker III, D. K. Moskovits. 1996. Neotropical birds: Ecology and conservation. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner M. G., R. H. Gardner, R. V. O’Neill. 2001. Landscape ecology in theory and practice: pattern and process. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner W., S. Spector, N. Gardiner, M. Fladeland, E. Sterling, M. Steininger. 2003. Remote sensing for biodiversity science and conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18:306–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells M. P., T. O. McShane. 2004. Integrating protected area management with local needs and aspirations. Ambio 33:513–519

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodroffe R., R. G. Joshua. 1998. Edge effects and the extinction of populations inside protected areas. Science 280:2126–2128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Young K. R. 1993a. National park protection in relation to the ecological zonation of a neighboring human community: An example from northern Peru. Mountain Research and Development 13:267–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Young K. R. 1993b. Woody and scandent plants on the edges of an Andean timberline. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 120:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young K. R. 1993c. Tropical timberlines: Changes in forest structure and regeneration between two Peruvian timberline margins. Arctic and Alpine Research 25:167–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young K. R. 1998. Deforestation in landscapes with humid forests in the central Andes: Patterns and processes. In K. S. Zimmerer, K. R. Young (eds.), Nature’s geography: New lessons for conservation in developing countries. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison. Pages 75–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Young K. R., P. L. Keating. 2001. Remnant forests of Volcan Cotachi, northern Ecuador. Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research 25:165–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young K. R., B. León. 1995. Connectivity, social actors, and conservation policies in the central Andes: The case of Peru’s montane forests. In S. P. Churchill, H. Balslev, E. Forero, J. L. Luteyn (eds.), Neotropical Montane Forest Biodiversity and Conservation Symposium. New York Botanical Garden, New York. Pages 653–661

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, K. R., and B. León. 1998. Peru’s humid eastern montane forests: An overview of their physical settings, biological diversity, human use and settlement, and conservation needs. DIVA, Technical Report No. 5:1–97. http://www.diva.dmu.dk/1_viden/2_miljoe-tilstand/3_natur/diva/diva_rep.htm

  • Young K. R., B. León. 2000. Biodiversity conservation in Peru’s eastern montane forests. Mountain Research and Development 20:208–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young K. R., W. B. Church, M. Leo, P. F. Moore. 1994 Threats to Rio Abiseo National Park, Northern Peru. Ambio 23:312–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Young K. R., B. León, A. Cano. 1997. Peruvian Puna. In S. D. Davis, V. H. Heywood, O. Herrera-MacBryde, J. Villa-Lobos, A. C. Hamilton (eds.), Centres of plant diversity: A guide and strategy for their conservation. WWW and IUCN, Cambridge, UK. Pages 470–476

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerer K. S., R. E. Galt, M. V. Buck. 2004. Globalization and multi-spatial trends in the coverage of protected-area conservation (1980–2000). Ambio 33:520–529

    Google Scholar 

  • Zomer, R., and S. L. Ustin. 1999. Land Cover Change Along Tropical and Subtropical Riparian Corridors Within the Makalu Barun National Parkland Conservation Area, Nepal. University of California, Davis, Davis

Download references

Acknowledgments

Funding for this research was graciously provided by grants from the University of Texas Study Abroad Office, the Tinker Foundation, and the University of Texas Environmental Science Institute. We are grateful to Esteban Antonio Alibriceño, Carolina Casaretto, Peric Franco Laisa, Mariella Leo, Blanca León, Orlando Ramirez, and Rogelio Cueva Salirrosas for their assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geography and the Environment, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, 78712, USA

    Damion B. Kintz, Kenneth R. Young & Kelley A. Crews-Meyer

Authors
  1. Damion B. Kintz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kenneth R. Young
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kelley A. Crews-Meyer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenneth R. Young.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kintz, D.B., Young, K.R. & Crews-Meyer, K.A. Implications of Land Use/Land Cover Change in the Buffer Zone of a National Park in the Tropical Andes. Environmental Management 38, 238–252 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-005-0147-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-005-0147-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation