Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Field-Based Evaluation Tool for Riparian Buffer Zones in Agricultural Catchments

  • Environmental Assessment
  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Riparian buffer zones can improve water quality and enhance habitat, but a comprehensive yet rapid method that can assist the resource manager in assessing the effectiveness of buffers is not available. The aim of this paper is to describe and illustrate the use of a newly developed field-based evaluation tool for riparian buffer zones in agricultural catchments. The Buffer Zone Inventory and Evaluation Form (BZIEF) incorporates criteria-based scoring systems developed from literature review, subsequent peer-review, and then a pilot field study. Use of the BZIEF is demonstrated by comparing buffer zones in three catchments established for water quality and habitat improvement under the Water Fringe Option agrienvironment scheme in England in order to assess whether the buffers were likely to provide environmental enhancement. Results among the three catchments were generally similar; buffer zones scored highly for their abundant vegetation cover, lack of erosion, stream habitat quality, and sufficient width. Furthermore, previous grassland or arable land use did not substantially affect buffer zone ratings. However, the BZIEF indicated that inappropriate soil characteristics in one catchment were likely to constrain buffer zone effectiveness for improving water quality. In another catchment, poor riparian vegetation diversity and structure may yield ineffective habitat enhancement, according to the BZIEF. It was concluded that the BZIEF might be a useful tool for buffer zone comparison and monitoring, even though more work is needed to test and validate the method. For example, the BZIEF could be used to target appropriate locations for buffer zones and is flexible, so could be adapted for different policies, objectives and regions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • G. W. Barrett (1992) Landscape ecology: designing sustainable agricultural landscapes. R. K. Olsen (Eds) Integrating sustainable agriculture, ecology and environmental management. Food Products London 83–103

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Beaudry (1997) Buffer zones and farming systems. N.E. Haycock T.P. Burt K.W.T. Goulding G. Pinay (Eds) Buffer zones: their processes and potential in water protection. Quest Environmental, Harpenden Herts., UK 275–282

    Google Scholar 

  • P. J. Boon N. T. H. Holmes P. S. Maitland T. A. Rowell J. Davies (1997) A system for evaluating rivers for conservation (SERCON): development, structure and function. P. J. Boon D. L. Howell (Eds) Freshwater quality: defining the indefinable? The Stationary Office Edinburgh 299–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Boorman, D. B., Hollis J. M., and Lilley A. 1995. Hydrology of soil types: a hydrologically-based classification of soils of the United Kingdom. Report No. 126, Institute of Hydrology, Oxfordshire, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. J. Bren (1993) ArticleTitleRiparian zone, stream, and floodplain issues: a review. Journal of Hydrology 150 277–299 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0022-1694(93)90113-N

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown County. 1994. Land use change and agricultural production. Land Conservation Department, Brown County, Green Bay, Wisconsin.

  • Brown County. 1995. Riparian vegetated buffer strips. Land Conservation Department, Brown County, Green Bay, Wisconsin.

  • R. C. Brunet G. Pinay F. Gazelle L. Roques (1994) ArticleTitleRole of the floodplain and riparian zone in suspended matter and nitrogen retention in the Adour River, south-west France. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 9 55–63

    Google Scholar 

  • S. E. Bunn (1993) ArticleTitleRiparian-stream linkages: research needs for the protection of in-stream values. Australian Biologist 6 46–51

    Google Scholar 

  • T. P. Burt L. S. Matchett K. W. T. Goulding C. P. Webster N. E. Haycock (1999) ArticleTitleDenitrification in riparian buffer zones: the role of floodplain hydrology. Hydrological Processes 13 1451–1463 Occurrence Handle10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(199907)13:10<1451::AID-HYP822>3.3.CO;2-N

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B. B. Caruso (2000) ArticleTitleComparative analysis of New Zealand and US approaches for agricultural nonpoint source pollution management. Environmental Management 25 9–22 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s002679910002 Occurrence Handle10552099

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • A. J. Castelle A. W. Johnson C. Conolly (1994) ArticleTitleWetland and stream buffer size requirements—a review. Journal of Environmental Quality 5 878–882

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Chave (2001) The EU water framework directive—an introduction. International Water Association London

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, K. J., Cooper A. B., Davies-Colley R. J., Rutherford J. C., Smith C. M., and Williamson R. B. 1995a. Managing riparian zones. A contribution to protecting New Zealand’s rivers and streams, 1: Concepts. Department of Conservation, Wellington, New Zealand.

  • Collier, K. J., Cooper A. B., Davies-Colley R. J. , Rutherford J. C., Smith C. M., and Williamson R. B.. 1995b. Managing riparian zones. A contribution to protecting New Zealand’s rivers and streams, 2: Guidelines. Department of Conservation, Wellington, New Zealand.

  • A. B. Cooper (1990) ArticleTitleNitrate depletion in the riparian zone and stream channel of a small headwater catchment. Hydrobiologia 202 13–26 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK3MXhsV2lsL0%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • A. B. Cooper J. W. Gilliam R. B. Daniels W. P. Robarge (1987) ArticleTitleRiparian areas as filters for agricultural sediment. American Journal of Soil Science 51 416–420

    Google Scholar 

  • D. L. Correll (1997) Buffer zones and water quality protection: general principles. N. E. Haycock T. P. Burt K. W. T. Goulding G. Pinay (Eds) Buffer zones: their processes and potential in water protection. Quest Environmental, Harpenden Herts., UK 7–20

    Google Scholar 

  • F. M. Courtney S. T. Trudgill (1976) The soil. An introduction to soil study in Britain. Edward Arnold London

    Google Scholar 

  • D. G. De Jalón (1995) Management of physical habitat for fish stocks. D. M. Harper A. J. D. Ferguson (Eds) The ecological basis for river management. John Wiley and Sons Chichester, UK 364–374

    Google Scholar 

  • T. A. Dillaha S. P. Inamdar (1997) Buffer zones as sediment traps and sources. N. E. Haycock T. P. Burt K. W. T. Goulding G. Pinay (Eds) Buffer zones: their processes and potential in water protection. Quest Environmental, Harpenden Herts., UK 33–42

    Google Scholar 

  • T. A. Dillaha J. H. Sherrard D. Lee (1989) ArticleTitleLong-term effectiveness and maintenance of vegetative filter strips. Water Environment and Technology 1 418–421

    Google Scholar 

  • M. G. Dosskey (2001) ArticleTitleToward quantifying water pollution abatement in response to installing buffers on crop land. Environmental Management 28 577–598 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MritF2rsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11568840

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • C. M. J. Ducros (1999) An evaluation of riparian buffer zone policy in UK agricultural catchments. Unpublished PhD thesis. University of Brighton Brighton, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Ducros N. M. Watson (2002) ArticleTitleIntegrated land and water management in the United Kingdom: narrowing the implementation gap. Journal of Environmental Management 45 403–423 Occurrence Handle10.1080/09640560220133423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Findley, D. C., Colborne G. J. N., Cope D. W., Harrod T. R., Hogan D. V., and Staines S. J. 1984. Soils and their use in South West England. Lawes Agricultural Trust (Soil Survey of England and wales), Harpenden, Herts., UK.

  • R. H. Foy M. Kirk (1995) ArticleTitleAgriculture and water quality: a regional study. Journal of the Chartered Institute of Water and Environmental Management 9 247–256 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK2MXotVOisL0%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • S. V. Gregory F. J. Swanson W. A. McKee K. W. Cummins (1991) ArticleTitleAn ecosystem perspective of riparian zones. BioScience 41 540–551

    Google Scholar 

  • P. M. Groffman (1997) Contaminant effects on microbial functions in riparian buffer zones. N. E. Haycock T. P. Burt K. W. T. Goulding G. Pinay (Eds) Buffer zones: their processes and potential in water protection. Quest Environmental, Harpenden Herts., UK 83–92

    Google Scholar 

  • D. M. Harper C. Smith P. Barham R. Howell (1995) The ecological basis for river management of the natural river environment. D. M. Harper A. J. D. Ferguson (Eds) The ecological basis for river management. John Wiley and Sons Chichester, UK 219–238

    Google Scholar 

  • N. E. Haycock T. P. Burt (1993) ArticleTitleRole of floodplain sediments in reducing the nitrate concentration of subsurface run-off: a case study in the Cotswolds, UK. Hydrological Processes 7 287–295

    Google Scholar 

  • N. E. Haycock T. P. Burt K. W. T. Goulding G. Pinay (1997) Buffer zones: their processes and potential in water protection. Quest Environmental, Harpenden Herts., UK

    Google Scholar 

  • A. R. Hill (1997) The potential role of in-stream and hyporheic environments as buffer zones. N. E. Haycock T. P. Burt K. W. T. Goulding G. Pinay (Eds) Buffer zones: their processes and potential in water protection. Quest Environmental, Harpenden Herts., UK 115–127

    Google Scholar 

  • L. R. Iverson D. L. Szafoni S. E. Baum E. A. Cook (2001) ArticleTitleA riparian wildlife habitat evaluation scheme developed using GIS. Environmental Management 28 639–654 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MritF2rtA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11568844

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • A. Jansen A. I. Robertson (2001) ArticleTitleRelationships between livestock management and the ecological condition of riparian habitats along an Australian floodplain river. Journal of Applied Ecology 38 63–75 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2664.2001.00557.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis, R. A., Bendelow R. I., Bradley R. I., Carroll D. M., Furness R. R., Kilgour I. N. L., and King S. J. . 1984. Soils and their use in Northern England. Lawes Agricultural Trust (Soil Survey of England and Wales), Harpenden, Herts., UK.

  • E. E. Jorgensen T. J. Canfield F. W. Kutz (2000) ArticleTitleRestored riparian buffers as tools for ecosystem restoration in the MAIA; processes, endpoints, and measures of success for water, soil, flora, and fauna. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 63 199–210 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1006491702574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. J. Kemp W. K. Dodds (2001) ArticleTitleSpatial and temporal patterns of nitrate concentrations in pristine and agriculturally-influenced prairie streams. Biogeochemistry 53 125–141 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXkt1Krtrw%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • M. Kent P. Coker (1992) Vegetation description and analysis: a practical approach. Belhaven London

    Google Scholar 

  • A. R. G. Large G. E. Petts (1994) Rehabilitation of river margins. P. Calow G. E. Petts (Eds) The rivers handbook, volume two. Blackwell Scientific Oxford 401–413

    Google Scholar 

  • K. H. Lee T. M. Isenhart R. C. Schultz S. K. Mickelson (2000) ArticleTitleMultispecies riparian buffers trap sediment and nutrients during rainfall simulations. Journal of Environmental Quality 29 1200–1205 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXlt1Wjsb4%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • J. Lyons S. W. Trimble L. K. Paine (2000) ArticleTitleGrass versus trees: managing riparian areas to benefit streams of central North America. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 36 919–930 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXmtlSmtbw%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • T. L. Martin N. K. Kaushik J. T. Trevors H. R. Whitelay (1999) ArticleTitleReview: denitrification in temperate climate riparian zones. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 111 171–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, B. 1975. Soils in North Yorkshire. Soil Series Record No. 23, Sheet SE76 (Westow), Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts., UK.

  • C. Margules M. B. Usher (1981) ArticleTitleCriteria used in assessing wildlife conservation potential: a review. Biological Conservation 21 79–109 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0006-3207(81)90073-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLaren, R. 1998. Monitoring of the Water Fringe Areas option of the Habitat Scheme 1994–1997. ADAS Report to the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Cambridge, UK.

  • Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. 1994. The Habitat Scheme: Water Fringe Areas explanatory booklet. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. D. Muscutt G. L. Harris S. W. Bailey D. B. Davies (1993) ArticleTitleBuffer zones to improve water quality: a review of their potential use in UK agriculture. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 45 59–77

    Google Scholar 

  • R. J. Naiman H. Décamps (1997) ArticleTitleThe ecology of interfaces: riparian zones. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 28 621–658 Occurrence Handle10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Rivers Authority. 1992. River corridor surveys. Methods and procedures. National Rivers Authority, Bristol, UK.

  • L. L. Osborne D. A. Kovacic (1993) ArticleTitleRiparian vegetated buffer strips in water-quality restoration and stream management. Freshwater Biology 29 243–258

    Google Scholar 

  • W. T. Peterjohn D. L. Correll (1984) ArticleTitleNutrient dynamics in an agricultural watershed: observations on the role of a riparian forest. Ecology 65 1466–1475 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaL2MXhtF2nsA%3D%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • R. C. Peterson L. B-M. Peterson J. Lacoursiere (1992) A building-block model for stream restoration. P. J. Boon P. Calow G. E. Petts (Eds) River conservation and management. John Wiley and Sons Chichester, UK 293–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Raven, P. J., Holmes N. T. H., Dawson F. H., Fox P. J. A., Everard M., Fozzard I. R., and Rouen K. J. 1998. River habitat quality. The physical character of rivers and streams in the UK and Isle of Man. Environment Agency, Bristol, UK.

  • Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, National Rivers Authority, and Royal Society for Nature Conservation. 1994. The new rivers and wildlife handbook. Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, Sandy, Beds., UK.

  • J. A. Skinner K. A. Lewis K. S. Bardon P. Tucker J. A. Catt B. J. Chambers (1997) ArticleTitleAn overview of the environmental impact of agriculture in the U.K. Journal of Environmental Management 50 111–128 Occurrence Handle10.1006/jema.1996.0103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L. A. Sovell B. Vondracek J. A. Frost K. G. Mumford (2000) ArticleTitleImpacts of rotational grazing and riparian buffers on physiochemical and biological characteristics of Southeastern Minnesota, USA, streams. Environmental Management 26 629–641 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s002670010121 Occurrence Handle11029114

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • A. Tytherleigh (1997) The establishment of buffer zones—the Habitat Scheme Water Fringe Option, UK. N.E. Haycock T.P. Burt K.W.T. Goulding G. Pinay (Eds) Buffer zones: their processes and potential in water protection. Quest Environmental, Harpenden Herts., UK 255–264

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr. Nigel Watson for project management; Professor T. P. Burt, Drs. J.-J. Gril, N. Haycock, and G. Pinay for reviewing the Buffer Zone Inventory and Evaluation Form; Sue Rowland for cartography; and the buffer zone landowners. Caroline Ducros acknowledges the financial support of the School of the Environment, University of Brighton, during the research project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ducros, C., Joyce, C. Field-Based Evaluation Tool for Riparian Buffer Zones in Agricultural Catchments . Environmental Management 32, 252–267 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-003-2913-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-003-2913-x

Keywords

Navigation