Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sensitivity of Indices of Biotic Integrity to Simulated Fish Assemblage Changes

  • Environmental Assessment
  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Multimetric indices of biotic integrity (IBIs) are commonly used to assess condition of stream fish assemblages, but their ability to monitor trends within streams over time is largely unknown. We assessed the trend detection ability of two IBI formulations (one with traditional scoring and metrics, and one with nontraditional scoring and region-specific metrics) and of similarity and diversity indices using simulations that progressively altered the fish assemblages of 39 streams in the United States mid-Atlantic Highlands region. We also assessed responses to simulated 50% variability in fish abundances, as a measure of background “noise.” Fish assemblage indices responded little to changes that affected all species proportionally despite substantial changes in total fish number. Assemblage indices responded better to scenarios that differentially affected fish species, either according to life history traits or by increasing dominance of already common species, but even these changes took some time to detect relative to background variability levels. Ordinations of stream fish assemblage data suggested that differences among sites were maintained even after substantial alterations of fish composition within sites. IBIs are designed to detect broad assemblage differences among sites while downplaying abundance changes and variability increases that were the first indications of within-site changes, and they appear more suited to detecting large departures from natural fish assemblages than for monitoring gradual changes such as those our simulations produced. Inferences about causes of assemblage changes should be made with caution because of correlations among species traits and interdependence among IBI component metrics. Site trend assessments should be made based on all available data rather than just by summary indices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P. L. Angermeier R. A. Smogor J. R. Stauffer (2000) ArticleTitleRegional frameworks and candidate metrics for assessing biotic integrity in Mid-Atlantic Highland streams. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 129 962–981

    Google Scholar 

  2. E. W. Beals (1984) ArticleTitleBray-Curtis ordination an effective strategy for analysis of multivariate ecological data. Advances in Ecological Research 14 1–55

    Google Scholar 

  3. T. P. Boyle G. M. Smillie J. C. Anderson D. R. Beeson (1990) ArticleTitleSensitivity analysis of nine diversity and seven similarity indices. Research Journal of the Water. Pollution Control Federation 62 749–762

    Google Scholar 

  4. K. D. Fausch J. R. Karr P. R. Yant (1984) ArticleTitleRegional application of an index of biotic integrity based on stream fish communities. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113 39–55

    Google Scholar 

  5. K. D. Fausch J. Lyons J. R. Karr P. L. Angermeyer (1990) ArticleTitleFish communities as indicators of environmental degradation. American Fisheries Society Symposium 8 123–144

    Google Scholar 

  6. L. S. Fore J. R. Karr L. L. Conquest (1994) ArticleTitleStatistical properties of an index of biological integrity used to evaluate water resources. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 51 1077–1087

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. D. Grossman J. F. Dowd M. Crawford (1990) ArticleTitleAssemblage stability in stream fishes: A review. Environmental Management 14 661–671

    Google Scholar 

  8. C. P. Hawkins (2000) ArticleTitleEvaluation of the use of landscape classifications for the prediction of freshwater biota: Synthesis and recommendations. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 19 541–556

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hoefs, N. J., and T. P. Boyle. 1992. Contribution of fish community metrics to the index of biotic integrity in two Ozark rivers. Pages 283–303 in D. H. McKenzie, D. E. Hyatt, and V. J. McDonald (eds.) Ecological indicators. Elsevier Applied Science, London.

  10. R. M. Hughes J. R. Gammon (1987) ArticleTitleLongitudinal changes in fish assemblages and water quality in the Willamette River, Oregon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 116 196–206

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hughes, R. M., and T. Oberdorff. 1999. Application of IBI concepts and metrics to waters outside the United States and Canada. Pages 79–93 in T. P., Simon (ed.) Assessing the sustainability and biological integrity of water resources using fish communities. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.

  12. R. M. Hughes P. R. Kaufmann A. T. Herlihy T. M. Kincaid L. Reynolds D. P. Larsen (1998) ArticleTitleA process for developing and evaluating indices of fish assemblage integrity. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 55 1618–1631 Occurrence Handle10.1139/cjfas-55-7-1618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. D. A. Jackson H. H. Harvey (1997) ArticleTitleQualitative and quantitative sampling of lake fish communities. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 54 2807–2813 Occurrence Handle10.1139/cjfas-54-12-2807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. P. D. Kanehl J. Lyons J. E. Nelson (1997) ArticleTitleChanges in the habitat and fish community of the Milwaukee River, Wisconsin, following removal of the Woolen Mills Dam. North American Journal of Fish Management 17 387–400

    Google Scholar 

  15. Karr, J. R. 1993. Measuring biological integrity: Lessons from streams. Pages 83–104 in S. Woodley, J. Kay, G. Frances (eds.) Ecological integrity and the management of ecosystems. St. Lucie Press, Florida.

  16. J. R. Karr E. W. Chu (1999) Restoring life in running waters—better biological monitoring Island Press Washington D.C

    Google Scholar 

  17. Karr, J. R., K. D. Fausch, P. L., Angermeier, P. R., Yant, and I. J. Schlosser. 1986. Assessing biological integrity in running water: A method and its rationale. Illinois Natural History Survey, Special Publication 5, Champaign, Illinois.

  18. J. R. Karr P. R. Yant K. D. Fausch (1987) ArticleTitleSpatial and temporal variability of the index of biotic integrity in three midwestern streams. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 116 1–11 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2427.1999.00427.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. M. Lammert J. D. Allan (1999) ArticleTitleAssessing biotic integrity of streams: Effects of scale in measuring the influence of land use/cover and habitat structure on fish and invertebrates. Environmental Management 23 257–270 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s002679900184 Occurrence Handle9852191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. P. M. Leonard D. J. Orth (1986) ArticleTitleApplication and testing of an index of biotic integrity in small coolwater streams. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 115 401–414

    Google Scholar 

  21. J. A. Ludwig J. F. Reynolds (1988) Statistical ecology John Wiley & Sons New York 337 pp

    Google Scholar 

  22. J. Lyons L. Wang T. D. Simonson (1996) ArticleTitleDevelopment and validation of an index of biotic integrity for cold-water streams in Wisconsin. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 16 241–256

    Google Scholar 

  23. J. J. Magnuson B. J. Benson A. S. McLain (1994) ArticleTitleInsights on species richness and turnover from long-term ecological research: fishes in north temperate lakes. American Zoologist 34 437–451

    Google Scholar 

  24. F. H. McCormick R. M. Hughes P. R. Kaufmann D. V. Peck J. L. Stoddard A. T. Herlihy (2001) ArticleTitleDevelopment of an index of biotic integrity for the Mid-Atlantic Highlands region. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 130 857–877

    Google Scholar 

  25. F. H McCormick D. V. Peck D. P. Larsen (2000) ArticleTitleComparison of geographic classification schemes for Mid-Atlantic stream fish assemblages. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 19 385–404

    Google Scholar 

  26. McCune, B., and M. J. Mefford. 1999. Multivariate analysis of ecological data, Version 4.14. MJM Software, Gleneden Beach, Oregon.

  27. D. L. Miller (1988) ArticleTitleRegional applications of an index of biotic integrity for use in water resource management. Fisheries 13 12–20

    Google Scholar 

  28. C. K. Minns V. W. Cairns R. G. Randall J. E. Moore (1994) ArticleTitleAn index of biotic integrity (IBI) for fish assemblages in the littoral zone of Great Lakes Areas of Concern. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 51 1804–1822

    Google Scholar 

  29. L. L. Osborne (1992) ArticleTitleInfluence of stream location in a drainage network on the index of biotic integrity. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 121 635–643

    Google Scholar 

  30. M. H. Paller M. J. M. Reichert J. M. Dean J. C. Seigle (2000) ArticleTitleUse of fish community data to evaluate restoration success of a riparian stream. Ecological Engineering 15 S171–S187 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0925-8574(99)00082-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. J. T. Peterson C. F. Rabeni (1995) ArticleTitleOptimizing sampling effort for sampling warmwater stream fish communities. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 15 528–541

    Google Scholar 

  32. F. J. Rahel (1990) ArticleTitleThe hierarchical nature of community persistence: A problem of scale. American Naturalist 136 328–344 Occurrence Handle10.1086/285101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Rankin, E. T., and C. O. Yoder. 1990. The nature of sampling variability in the index of biotic integrity (IBI) in Ohio streams. Pages 9–18 in W. S. Davis (ed.), Proceedings of the 1990 Midwest Pollution Control Biologists Meeting. U.S.-EPA report 905/9-90/005. Chicago.

  34. Rankin, E. T., and C. O. Yoder. 1998. Adjustments to the index of biotic integrity: a summary of Ohio experiences and some suggested modifications. Pages 625–637 in T. P. Simon (ed.), Assessing the sustainability and biological integrity of water resources using fish communities. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.

  35. Reinke, D. C. 1986. Evaluation of the use of community similarly techniques as applied to phytoplankton communities. Pages 6–16 in J. C. Cairns (ed.), Community toxicity testing. American Society for Testing and Materials, report ASTM STP 920. Ann Arbor, Michigan.

  36. N. Roth (1998) ArticleTitleMaryland biological stream survey: Development of a fish index of biotic integrity. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 51 89–106 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1005950228017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. M. K. Schubauer-Berigan M. Smith J. Hopkins S. M. Cormier (2000) ArticleTitleUsing historical biological data to evaluate status and trends in the Big Darby Creek watershed (Ohio, USA). Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 19 1097–1105 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXitFeis7w%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. M. C. Scott L. W. Hall (1997) ArticleTitleFish assemblages as indicators of environmental degradation in Maryland coastal streams. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 126 349–360

    Google Scholar 

  39. M. C. Scott G. S. Helfman (2001) ArticleTitleNative invasions, homogenization, and the mismeasure of integrity of fish assemblages. Fisheries 26 6–15

    Google Scholar 

  40. F. D. Shields S. S. Knight C. M. Cooper (1995) ArticleTitleUse of the index of biotic integrity to assess physical habitat degradation in warmwater streams. Hydrobiologia 312 191–208

    Google Scholar 

  41. Simon, T. P. 1998. Assessing the sustainability and biological integrity of water resources using fish communities. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.

  42. Simon, T. P., and J. Lyons . 1995, Application of the Index of Biotic Integrity to evaluate water resource integrity in freshwater ecosystems. Pages 245–262 in W. S. Davis and T. P. Simon (eds.), Biological assessment and criteria: tools for water resource planning and decision making. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida.

  43. Smokorowski, K. E., M. G. Stoneman, V. W. Cairns, C. K. Minns, R. G. Randall, and B. Valere. 1998. Trends in the nearshore fish community of Hamilton Harbour, 1988 to 1997, as measured using an index of biotic integrity. Canadian Technical Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences no. 2230.

  44. SYSTAT, Inc. 1999. SYSTAT 9. SPSS Inc., Chicago.

  45. Wang, L., J. Lyons, P. Kanehl, R. Bannerman, and E. Emmons. 2000. Watershed urbanization and changes in fish communities in southeastern Wisconsin streams. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 36:1173–1189.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Yoder, C. O., and J. E. DeShon. 2002. Using biological response signatures within a framework of multiple indicators to assess and diagnose causes and sources of impairments to aquatic assemblages. Pages 23–81 in T. P. Simon (ed.), Biological response signatures: indicator patterns using aquatic communities. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.

  47. Yoder, C. O., and E. T. Rankin. 1995. Biological response signatures and the area of degradation value: New tools for interpreting multimetric data. Pages 263–286 in W. S. Davis and T. P. Simon (eds.), Biological assessment and criteria: tools for water resource planning and decision making. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida.

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the many people who conducted field sampling and provided species identification, database management, and statistical support for the EMAP project. Thanks to John Brazner for many conversations about fish assemblage assessment and reviewing several versions of the manuscript. Valerie Brady and Jack Kelly also provided constructive reviews, as did journal editors and reviewers. This research was supported directly by the US Environmental Protection Agency and by a postgraduate fellowship to A.T. funded by EPA through the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education. This manuscript has been reviewed by EPA’s National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory and approved for publication, although approval does not signify that the contents reflect the views of the agency.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Mid-Continent Ecology Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 6201 Congdon Boulevard, Duluth, Minnesota 55804, USA

    Anett S. Trebitz & Brian H. Hill

  2. Ecological Exposure Research Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 26 W. Martin Luther King Dr., Cincinnati, Ohio 45268, USA

    Frank H. McCormick

Authors
  1. Anett S. Trebitz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Brian H. Hill
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Frank H. McCormick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anett S. Trebitz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Trebitz, A., Hill, B. & McCormick, F. Sensitivity of Indices of Biotic Integrity to Simulated Fish Assemblage Changes . Environmental Management 32, 499–515 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-003-0061-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-003-0061-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation