Skip to main content
Log in

Testes mass in megachiropteran bats varies in accordance with sperm competition theory

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sperm competition is a widespread phenomenon influencing a range of characters, including investment in gonadal tissue. Conspecific proximity is one factor which can influence the risk of sperm competition and hence testicular investment, and decreased confidence of paternity may be one cost of group living. Aspects of female biology may also influence spermatogenic investment and sperm morphology. This study examines the associations between relative testes mass and roost-group size across 17 species of Megachiroptera. Associations between breeding season duration and investment in spermatogenesis are also examined, as are associations between female reproductive tract dimensions and testes mass and dimensions of spermatozoa across all bats. Relative testes mass was significantly positively associated with roost-group size at a species level and after appropriate phylogenetic control (pairwise comparisons and comparison of independent contrasts). There were no significant relationships between breeding season duration and relative testes mass. Across all bats, neither testes mass nor sperm length were significantly related to dimensions of the female tract. The results are discussed in the context of sperm competition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: 7 January 1998 / Accepted after revision: 8 August 1998

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hosken, D. Testes mass in megachiropteran bats varies in accordance with sperm competition theory. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 44, 169–177 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/s002650050529

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002650050529

Navigation