Skip to main content
Log in

A Retrospective Case–Control Study Assessing the Role of Trabecular Bone Score in Postmenopausal Caucasian Women with Osteopenia: Analyzing the Odds of Vertebral Fracture

  • Published:
Calcified Tissue International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This case–control study assessed whether the trabecular bone score (TBS), determined from gray-level analysis of DXA images, might be of any diagnostic value, either alone or combined with bone mineral density (BMD), in the assessment of vertebral fracture risk among postmenopausal women with osteopenia. Of 243 postmenopausal Caucasian women, 50–80 years old, with BMD T-scores between –1.0 and –2.5, we identified 81 with osteoporosis-related vertebral fractures and compared them with 162 age-matched controls without fractures. Primary outcomes were BMD and TBS. For BMD, each incremental decrease in BMD was associated with an OR = 1.54 (95% CI = 1.17–2.03), and the AUC was 0.614 (0.550–0.676). For TBS, corresponding values were 2.53 (1.82–3.53) and 0.721 (0.660–0.777). The difference in the AUC for TBS vs. BMD was statistically significant (p = 0.020). The OR for (TBS + BMD) was 2.54 (1.86–3.47) and the AUC 0.732 (0.672–0.787). In conclusion, the TBS warrants a closer look to see whether it may be of clinical usefulness in the determination of fracture risk in postmenopausal osteopenic women.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. NIH Consensus Development Panel on Osteoporosis Prevention Diagnosis and Therapy (2001) Osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. JAMA 285:785–795

    Google Scholar 

  2. Davies KM, Stegman MR, Heaney RP, Recker RR (2005) Prevalence and severity of vertebral fracture: the Saunders County Bone Quality Study. Osteoporos Int 6:160–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Vogt TM, Ross PD, Palermo L, Musliner T, Genant HK, Black D, Thompson DE (2000) Vertebral fracture prevalence among women screened for the fracture intervention trial and a simple clinical tool to screen for undiagnosed vertebral fractures. Mayo Clin Proc 75:888–896

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Johnell O, Kanis JA, Oden E, Johansson H, De Laet C, Delmas P, Eisman JA, Fujiwara S, Kroger H, Mellstrom.D., Meunier PJ, Melton LJ3, O’Neill T, Pols H, Reeve J, Silman A, Tenenhouse A (2005) Predictive value of BMD for hip and other fractures. J Bone Miner Res 20:1185–1194

  5. WHO Study Group (1994) Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis [Report of the WHO Study Group]. WHO Tech Rep Ser 843:1–129

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hordon LD, Raisi M, Paxton S, Beneton MM, Kanis JA, Aaron JE (2000) Trabecular architecture in women and men of similar bone mass with and without vertebral fracture: part I. 2-D histology. Bone 27:271–276

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rice JC, Cowin SC, Bowman JA (1988) On the dependence of the elasticity and strength of cancellous bone on apparent density. J Biomech 21:155–168

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Link TM, Majumdar S (2004) Current diagnostic techniques in the evaluation of bone architecture. Curr Osteoporos Rep 2:47–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rubin CD (2005) Emerging concepts in osteoporosis and bone strength. Curr Med Res Opin 21:1049–1056

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sawada K, Morishige K, Ohmichi M, Nishio Y, Yamamoto T, Hayakawa J, Mabuchi S, Isobe A, Sasaki H, Sakata M (2003) Peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) is useful for monitoring bone mineral density of the patients who receive hormone replacement therapy. Maturitas 56:343–349

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Pothuaud L, Carceller P, Hans D (2008) Correlations between grey-level variations in 2D projection images (TBS) and 3D microarchitecture: applications in the study of human trabecular bone microarchitecture. Bone 42:775–787

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pothuaud L, Barthe N, Isidore MP, Carceller P, Hans D (2008) Validation of a 2D/3D generic mathematical relationship between TBS as assessed by DXA, and BV/TV and TbTh as assessed by micro computed tomography: an experimental study based on human cadaver vertebrae. Proceedings, 30th Meeting of ASBMR, Montreal, p 194

  13. Pothuaud L, Barthe N, Krieg M-A, Mehsen N, Carceller P, Hans D (2009) Evaluation of the potential use of TBS to complement BMD in the diagnosis of osteoporosis: a preliminary spine BMD-matched, case-control study. J Clin Densitometry 12(2):170–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Genant HK, Jergas M, Palermo L, Nevitt M, Valentin RS, Black D, Cummings SR (1996) Comparison of semiquantitative visual and quantitative morphometric assessment of prevalent and incident vertebral fractures in osteoporosis: the study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. J Bone Miner Res 11:984–996

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rabier B, Winzenrieth R, Héraud A, Grand-Lenoir C, Pothuaud L, Hans D (2009) A multicentre, retrospective case-control study assessing the role of trabecular bone score (TBS) in a cohort of menopausal Caucasian women with low bone mineral density (BMD): analysing the risk of vertebral fracture. Bone (in press)

Download references

Acknowledgment

This study was supported by Medimaps SA, Bordeaux, France.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Renaud Winzenrieth.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Winzenrieth, R., Dufour, R., Pothuaud, L. et al. A Retrospective Case–Control Study Assessing the Role of Trabecular Bone Score in Postmenopausal Caucasian Women with Osteopenia: Analyzing the Odds of Vertebral Fracture. Calcif Tissue Int 86, 104–109 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-009-9322-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-009-9322-y

Keywords

Navigation