Abstract
We study the welfare effects of different types of pre-arrangements (as identified in Sönmez in J Econ Theory 86:148–156, 1999) under the intern-optimal and hospital-optimal stable mechanisms in matching markets. First, both mechanisms are manipulable via Type-2 pre-arrangements. Regarding the welfare consequences, they might cause inefficient outcomes to arise, and the welfare effects on each side are ambiguous in the sense that there might be agents from each side, apart from pre-arranging ones, being better and worse off. Then, for Type-1 pre-arrangements, due to Kojima and Pathak (Am Econ Rev 99(3):608–627, 2009), we know that the intern-optimal stable mechanism is immune to this type of manipulations. In contrast to this result, the hospital-optimal stable mechanism turns out to be manipulable. More interestingly, they do not result in inefficient outcomes, and the welfare effects on each side are unambiguous: All hospitals (interns) are better (worse) off.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abdulkadiroǧlu A., Pathak P.A., Roth A.E.: The New York City high school match. Am Econ Rev P&P 95, 364–367 (2005)
Avery C., Jolls C., Posner R.A., Roth A.E.: The new market for federal judicial law clerks. Univ Chicago Law Rev 74(2), 447–486 (2007)
Christopher A., Levin J.: Early admissions at selective colleges. Am Econ Rev 100(5), 2125–2156 (2010)
Gale D., Shapley L.S.: College admissions and the stability of marriage. Am Math Mon 69, 9–15 (1962)
Halaburda H.: Unravelling in two-sided matching markets and similarity of preferences. Game Econ Behav 69(2), 365–393 (2010)
Haruvy E., Roth A.E., Ünver M.U.: The dynamics of law clerk matching: an experimental and computational investigation of proposals for reform of the market. J Econ Dyn Contr 30(3), 457–486 (2006)
Kesten, O.: On two kinds of manipulation for school choice problems. Econ Theory, doi:10.1007/s00199-011-0618-6 (2011)
Kesten, O., Yazıcı, A.: The Pareto dominant strategy-proof and fair rule for problems with indivisible goods. Econ Theory, doi:10.1007/s00199-010-0569-3 (2010)
Kojima F.: Mixed strategies in games of capacity manipulation in hospital-intern markets. Soc Choice Welfare 27, 25–28 (2006)
Kojima F., Manea M.: Incentives in the probabilistic serial mechanism. J Econ Theory 145(1), 106–123 (2010)
Kojima F., Pathak P.A.: Incentives and stability in large two-sided matching markets. Am Econ Rev 99(3), 608–627 (2009)
Konishi H., Ünver M.U.: Games of capacity manipulation in hospital-intern markets. Soc Choice Welfare 27(1), 3–24 (2006)
Li H., Rosen S.: Unraveling in matching markets. Am Econ Rev 88(3), 371–387 (1998)
Li H., Suen W.: Risk-sharing, sorting, and early contracting. J Polit Econ 81(3), 1058–1091 (2000)
Roth A.E.: The economics of matching: stability and incentives. Math Oper Res 7(4), 617–628 (1982)
Roth A.E.: The college admissions problem is not equivalent to the marriage problem. J Econ Theory 36, 277–288 (1985)
Roth A.E.: New physicians: a natural experiment in market organization. Science 250, 1524–1528 (1990)
Roth A.E.: A natural experiment in the organization of entry-level labor markets: regional markets for new physicians and surgeons in the United Kingdom. Am Econ Rev 81, 415–440 (1991)
Roth A.E., Pathak P.A., Abdulkadiroğlu A., Sönmez T.: The Boston public school match. Am Econ Rev 95(2), 368–371 (2005)
Roth A.E., Peranson E.: The redesign of the matching market for american physicians: some engineering aspects of economic design. Am Econ Rev 89(4), 748–780 (1999)
Roth A.E., Sotomayor M.: Two-Sided Matching: A Study in Game-Theoretic Modeling and Analysis. Econometric Society Monographs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1990)
Roth A.E., Xiaolin X.: Jumping the gun: imperfections and institutions related to the timing of market transactions. Am Econ Rev 84(4), 992–1044 (1994)
Şanver M.R.: Strategy-proofness of the plurality rule over restricted domains. Econ Theory 39(3), 461–471 (2009)
Sönmez T.: Manipulation via capacities in two-sided matching markets. J Econ Theory 77(1), 197–204 (1997)
Sönmez T.: Can pre-arranged matches be avoided in two-sided matching markets?. J Econ Theory 86, 148–156 (1999)
Suen W.: A competitive theory of equilibrium and disequilibrium unravelling in two-sided matching. RAND J Econ 31(1), 101–120 (2000)
Svensson L.G.: Coalitional strategy-proofness and fairness. Econ Theory 40(2), 227–245 (2009)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
I am grateful to Muriel Niederle, Ahmet alkan and especially Fuhito Kojima, the Associate Editor and two anonymous referees for their insightful comments and suggestions. I thank Tim Bresnahan, Bertan Turhan, and İrem Özsaraçoğlu.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Afacan, M.O. The welfare effects of pre-arrangements in matching markets. Econ Theory 53, 139–151 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-012-0695-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-012-0695-1