Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Randomized trial of a web-based tool for prolapse: impact on patient understanding and provider counseling

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Effective patient/provider communication is important to ensure patient understanding, safety, and satisfaction. Our hypothesis was that interactive patient/provider counseling using a web-based tool (iPad™ application) would have a greater impact on patient satisfaction with understanding prolapse symptoms compared with standard counseling (SC).

Methods

Women with complaints of seeing/sensing a vaginal bulge were enrolled in this randomized controlled trial. Participants completed pre- and postvisit Likert scale questionnaires on satisfaction with prolapse knowledge and related anxiety. After new patient histories and physical examinations, study participants were randomized to SC or SC with iPad™. Ninety participants were required to detect a 30 % difference in satisfaction with prolapse knowledge between the two groups.

Results

Ninety women were randomized to SC (n = 44) or SC with iPad™ (n = 46). At baseline, 47 % of women were satisfied with their understanding of bulge symptoms (50 % SC vs. 43.5 % SC with iPad™, p = 0.5). After counseling, 97 % of women reported increased satisfaction with understanding of bulge symptoms (p < 0.0001), with no difference between groups [42/44 (95.5 %) SC vs. 45/46 (97.8 %) SC with iPad™, p = 0.5]. Baseline anxiety was high: 70 % (65.9 % SC vs. 73.9 % SC with iPad™, p = 0.4). After counseling, anxiety decreased to 30 % (p < 0.0001), with improvement in both groups (31.8 % SC vs. 28.3 % SC with iPad™, p = 0.7). Counseling times were similar between groups (9.5 min., SC vs. 8.9 min., SC with iPad, p = 0.4).

Conclusions

Interactive counseling was associated with increased patient satisfaction with understanding bulge symptoms and decreased anxiety whether a web-based tool was used or not.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boyles SH, Weber AM, Meyn L (2003) Procedures for pelvic organ prolapse in the United States, 1979–1997. Am J Obstet Gynecol 188(1):108–115. doi:10.1067/mob.2003.101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Anger JT, Lee UJ, Mittal BM, Pollard ME, Tarnay CM, Maliski S, Rogers RG (2012) Health literacy and disease understanding among aging women with pelvic floor disorders. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 18(6):340–343. doi:10.1097/SPV.0b013e31826fb8d3

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Heller L, Parker PA, Youssef A, Miller MJ (2008) Interactive digital education aid in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 122(3):717–724. doi:10.1097/PRS.0b013e318180ed06

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Levinson W, Lesser CS, Epstein RM (2010) Developing physician communication skills for patient-centered care. Heal Aff (Millwood) 29(7):1310–1318. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Stein T, Frankel RM, Krupat E (2005) Enhancing clinician communication skills in a large healthcare organization: a longitudinal case study. Patient Educ Couns 58(1):4–12. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2005.01.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Brody DS, Miller SM, Lerman CE, Smith DG, Lazaro CG, Blum MJ (1989) The relationship between patients' satisfaction with their physicians and perceptions about interventions they desired and received. Med Care 27(11):1027–1035

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wofford JL, Smith ED, Miller DP (2005) The multimedia computer for office-based patient education: a systematic review. Patient Educ Couns 59(2):148–157. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2004.10.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Krishna S, Balas EA, Spencer DC, Griffin JZ, Boren SA (1997) Clinical trials of interactive computerized patient education: implications for family practice. J Fam Pract 45(1):25–33

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Davey HM, Barratt AL, Butow PN, Deeks JJ (2007) A one-item question with a Likert or Visual Analog Scale adequately measured current anxiety. J Clin Epidemiol 60(4):356–360. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.07.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Customized POP-Q Exercise -- Quick Score Entry (Part 3 of 6) (2011). http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zzx1EgekSHw. Accessed 10 Feburary 2012

  11. Kinnane N, Thompson L (2008) Evaluation of the addition of video-based education for patients receiving standard pre-chemotherapy education. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 17(4):328–339

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erinn M. Myers.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Myers, E.M., Robinson, B.L., Geller, E.J. et al. Randomized trial of a web-based tool for prolapse: impact on patient understanding and provider counseling. Int Urogynecol J 25, 1127–1132 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-014-2364-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-014-2364-3

Keywords

Navigation