Skip to main content
Log in

Flexible Term Structure Estimation: Which Method is Preferred?

  • Published:
Metrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We show that the recently developed non-parametric procedure for fitting the term structure of interest rates developed by Linton, Mammen, Nielsen, and Tanggaard (J Econ 105(1):185–223, 2001) overall performs notably better than the highly flexible McCulloch (J Finon 30:811–830, 1975) cubic spline and Fama and Bliss (Am Econ Rev 77:680–692, 1987) bootstrap methods. However, if interest is limited to the Treasury-bill region alone then the Fama–Bliss method demonstrates superior performance. We further show, via simulation, that using the estimated short rate from the Linton–Mammen–Nielsen–Tanggaard procedure as a proxy for the short rate has higher precision then the commonly used proxies of the one and three month Treasury-bill rates. It is demonstrated that this precision is important when using proxies to estimate the stochastic process governing the evolution of the short rate

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aït-Sahalia Y (1996a) Non-parametric pricing of interest rate derivative securities. Econometrica 64(3):527–560

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Aït-Sahalia Y (1996b) Testing continuous-time models of the spot interest rate. Rev Financ Stud 9:385–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amihud Y, Mendelsohn H (1991) Liquidity, maturity and the yields on US treasury securities. J Finan 46:1411–1425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandi F, Phillips P (2003) Fully nonparametric estimation of scalar diffusion models. Econometrica 71:241–283

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bliss R (1997) Testing term structure estimation methods. Adv Futures Options Res 9:197–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers DR, Carleton WT, Waldman DW (1984) A new approach to estimation of the term structure of interest rates. J Finan Quant Anal 19:233–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan KC, Karolyi GA, Longstaff FA, Sanders AB (1992) An empirical comparison of alternative models of the short-term interest rate. J Finan 47:1209–1227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman DA, Pearson ND (2000) Is the short rate drift actually nonlinear?. J Finan 55:355–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman DA, Long JB, Pearson ND (1999) Using proxies for the short rate: when are three months like an instant?. Rev Financ Stud 12(4):763–806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen R, Scott L (1993) Maximum likelihood estimation for a multifactor equilibrium model of the term structure of interest rates. J Fixed Income 4:14–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Conley T, Hansen PL, Luttmer E, Scheinkman J (1997) Short-Term Interest rate as subordinated diffusion. Rev Financ Stud 10, 10(3):525–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox J, Ingersol J, Ross S (1985) A theory of the term structure of interest rates. Econometrica 53:385–406

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Duffee D (1996) Idisyncratic variation of treasury bill yields. J Finance 51:527–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama E, Bliss R (1987) The information in long-maturity forward rates. Am Econ Rev 77:680–692

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher M, Nychka D, Zervos D (1995) Fitting the term structure of interest rates with smoothing splines. Working paper 95-1, Finance and economics discussion series, Federal Reserve Board

  • Heath D, Jarrow R, Morton A (1992) Bond pricing and the term structure of interest rates: a new methodology for contingent claims valuation. Econometrica 60:77–105

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hull J, White A (1990) Pricing interest rate derivative securities. Rev Financ Stud 3(4):573–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang G, Knight J (1997) A nonparametric approach to the estimation of diffusion processes, with an application to a short term interest rate model. Econ Theory 13:616–645

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Linton O, Mammen E, Nielsen J, Tanggaard C (2001) Estimating yield curves by kernel smoothing methods. J Econ 105(1):185–223

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • McCulloch JH (1971) Measuring the term structure of interest rates. J Bus 44:19–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCulloch JH (1975) The tax-adjusted yield curve. J Finan 30:811–830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson CR, Siegel AF (1987) Parsimonious modeling of yield curves. J Bus 60:473–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarig O, Warga A (1989) Bond price data and bond market liquidity. J Financ Quant Anal 24:367–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanton R (1997) A nonparametric model of term structure dynamics and the market price of interest rate risk. J Finan 52:1973–2002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svensson LEO (1994) Estimating and interpreting forward interest rates: Sweden 1992/4. IMF working paper no 94/114

  • Vasicek OA, Fong HG (1982) Term structure modelling using exponential splines. J Finan 37:339–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vasicek O (1977) An equilibrium characterization of the term structure. J Financ Econo 5:177–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waggoner D (1997) Spline method for extracting interest rate curves from coupon-bond prices. Working paper 97–10, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, USA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew Jeffrey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jeffrey, A., Linton, O. & Nguyen, T. Flexible Term Structure Estimation: Which Method is Preferred?. Metrika 63, 99–122 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00184-005-0017-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00184-005-0017-8

Keywords

Navigation