Skip to main content
Log in

Linear approach for solving a piecewise linear vendor selection problem of quantity discounts using lexicographic method

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The multi-objective problem pertaining to vendor selection becomes complicated with the inclusion of a discount pricing schedule due to its nature of piecewise linearity. To overcome the difficulty of solving such a piecewise linear multi-objective problem, a linear approach is described in this paper. The use of the lexicographic method enables the decision-maker to establish the limit for defective components and late deliveries as constraints in the model. Demand can be exactly met considering the defective components present in the supply. Applying this approach to a manufacturing firm has proved its practicality. Also, the proposed methodology can be effectively used in JIT/Lean supply environments by fixing the number of vendors .

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ansari A, Modarress B (1998) JIT purchasing as a quality and productivity center. Int J Prod Res 26(1):19–26

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bartholomew D (1984) The vendor-customer relationship today. Prod Inventory Manage 25(2):106–121

    Google Scholar 

  3. Buffa FP, Jackson WM (1983) A goal programming model for purchase planning. J Purchas Mater Manage 19:27–34

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chaudhry SS, Forst FG, Zydiak JL (1993) Vendor selection with price breaks. Eu J Oper Res 70:52–66

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Choi JW (1994) Investment in the reduction of uncertainties in just in time purchasing systems. Naval Res Logist 41:257–272

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Cohon JL (1978) Multi-objective programming and planning. Academic Press, New York

  7. Dickson GW (1966) An analysis of vendor selection systems and decisions. J Purchas 2(1):5–17

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ellram LM (1995) Total cost of ownership: an analysis approach for purchasing. Int J Phys Distribution Logist Manage 25 (8):4–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ellram LM (1995) Activity-based costing and total cost of ownership: a critical linkage. J Cost Manage 8(4):22–30

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fandel G, Reese J (1991) Just in time logistics of a supplier in the car manufacturing industry. Int J Prod Econ 24:55–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Roodhooft F, Konings J (1997) Vendor selection and evaluation an activity-based costing approach. Eu J Oper Res 96(1):97–102

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Gilgeous V, Yamada Y (1996) An interview-based study of two United Kingdom and two Japanese suppliers to Toyota. Int J Prod Res 34(6):1497–1515

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Gregory RE (1986) Source selection: a matrix approach. J Purchas Mater Manage 22(2):24–29

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hokey M (1994) International supplier selection. Int J Phys Dist 24(5):24–33

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jack GA, Adrie JM, Van Beek P (2000) Modeling and simulating multi echelon food systems. Eu J Oper Res 122(2):354–366

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Olhager J, Rudberg M, Wikner J (1999) Long-term capacity management. Int J Prod Econ 69:215–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kalyanmoy D (1995) Optimization for engineering design. Prentice Hall of India Private Limited, New Delhi

  18. Kelle P, Miller PA (1998) Transition to just in time purchasing-handling uncertain deliveries with vendor-purchaser co-operation. Int J Oper Prod Manage 18(1):53–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lubben RT (1998) Just in time manufacturing. McGraw-Hill, New York

  20. de Boer L, Labro E, Morlacchi P (2001) A review of methods supporting supplier selection. Eu J Purchas Supply Manage 7:75–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Alves MJ, Climaco J (2000) An interactive reference point approach for multi-objective mixed-integer programming. Eu J Oper Res 124(3):478–494

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Youssef MA, Zairi M, Mohanty B (1992) Supplier selection in an advanced manufacturing technology environment. Benchmarking Qual Manage Technol 3:60–72

    Google Scholar 

  23. Newman RG (1988) The buyer-supplier relationship under just in time. Prod Inventory Manage J 29(3):45–49

    Google Scholar 

  24. Nydick RL, Hill RP (1992) Using the analytic hierarchy process to structure the supplier selection procedure. Int J Purchas Mater Manage 28(2):31–36

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ramasesh RV (1990) Recasting the traditional inventory model to implement just in time purchasing. Prod Inventory Manage J 31(1):71–75

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sadrian AA, Yoon YS (1994) A procurement decision support system in business volume discount environments. Oper Res 42(1):14–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Croom S, Romano P, Giannakis M (2000) Supply chain management: an analytical framework. Eu J Purchas Supply Chain Manage 6:67–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Smytka DL, Clemens MW (1993) Total cost supplier selection model: a case study. Int J Purchas Mater Manage 29(1):42–49

    Google Scholar 

  29. Talluri S (2002) A buyer–seller game model for selection and negotiation of purchasing bids. Eu J Oper Res 143(1):171–180

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Talluri S, Narasimhan R (2003) Vendor evaluation with performance variability: a max-min approach. Eu J Oper Res 146:543–552

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Tayur S, Ganeshan R (1999) Quantitative models for supply chain management. Kluwer, Dordrecht

  32. Weber CA, Current JR, Benton WC (1991) Vendor selection criteria and methods. Eu J Oper Res 50:2–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Weber CA, Current JR (1993) A multiobjective approach to vendor selection. Eu J Oper Res 68:173–184

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Weber CA, Current JR, Desai A (1998) Non-cooperative negotiation strategies for vendor selection. Eu J Oper Res 108:208–223

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Weber CA, Current JR, Desai A (2000) An optimization approach to determining the number of vendors to employ. Supply Chain Manage Int J 5(2):90–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Gao Z, Tang L (2003) A multi-objective model for purchasing of bulk raw materials of a large-scale integrated steel plant. Int J Prod Econ 83(3):325–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Karunamoorthy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arunkumar, N., Karunamoorthy, L., Anand, S. et al. Linear approach for solving a piecewise linear vendor selection problem of quantity discounts using lexicographic method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 28, 1254–1260 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-004-2474-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-004-2474-z

Keywords

Navigation