Abstract
The multi-objective problem pertaining to vendor selection becomes complicated with the inclusion of a discount pricing schedule due to its nature of piecewise linearity. To overcome the difficulty of solving such a piecewise linear multi-objective problem, a linear approach is described in this paper. The use of the lexicographic method enables the decision-maker to establish the limit for defective components and late deliveries as constraints in the model. Demand can be exactly met considering the defective components present in the supply. Applying this approach to a manufacturing firm has proved its practicality. Also, the proposed methodology can be effectively used in JIT/Lean supply environments by fixing the number of vendors .
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ansari A, Modarress B (1998) JIT purchasing as a quality and productivity center. Int J Prod Res 26(1):19–26
Bartholomew D (1984) The vendor-customer relationship today. Prod Inventory Manage 25(2):106–121
Buffa FP, Jackson WM (1983) A goal programming model for purchase planning. J Purchas Mater Manage 19:27–34
Chaudhry SS, Forst FG, Zydiak JL (1993) Vendor selection with price breaks. Eu J Oper Res 70:52–66
Choi JW (1994) Investment in the reduction of uncertainties in just in time purchasing systems. Naval Res Logist 41:257–272
Cohon JL (1978) Multi-objective programming and planning. Academic Press, New York
Dickson GW (1966) An analysis of vendor selection systems and decisions. J Purchas 2(1):5–17
Ellram LM (1995) Total cost of ownership: an analysis approach for purchasing. Int J Phys Distribution Logist Manage 25 (8):4–23
Ellram LM (1995) Activity-based costing and total cost of ownership: a critical linkage. J Cost Manage 8(4):22–30
Fandel G, Reese J (1991) Just in time logistics of a supplier in the car manufacturing industry. Int J Prod Econ 24:55–64
Roodhooft F, Konings J (1997) Vendor selection and evaluation an activity-based costing approach. Eu J Oper Res 96(1):97–102
Gilgeous V, Yamada Y (1996) An interview-based study of two United Kingdom and two Japanese suppliers to Toyota. Int J Prod Res 34(6):1497–1515
Gregory RE (1986) Source selection: a matrix approach. J Purchas Mater Manage 22(2):24–29
Hokey M (1994) International supplier selection. Int J Phys Dist 24(5):24–33
Jack GA, Adrie JM, Van Beek P (2000) Modeling and simulating multi echelon food systems. Eu J Oper Res 122(2):354–366
Olhager J, Rudberg M, Wikner J (1999) Long-term capacity management. Int J Prod Econ 69:215–225
Kalyanmoy D (1995) Optimization for engineering design. Prentice Hall of India Private Limited, New Delhi
Kelle P, Miller PA (1998) Transition to just in time purchasing-handling uncertain deliveries with vendor-purchaser co-operation. Int J Oper Prod Manage 18(1):53–65
Lubben RT (1998) Just in time manufacturing. McGraw-Hill, New York
de Boer L, Labro E, Morlacchi P (2001) A review of methods supporting supplier selection. Eu J Purchas Supply Manage 7:75–89
Alves MJ, Climaco J (2000) An interactive reference point approach for multi-objective mixed-integer programming. Eu J Oper Res 124(3):478–494
Youssef MA, Zairi M, Mohanty B (1992) Supplier selection in an advanced manufacturing technology environment. Benchmarking Qual Manage Technol 3:60–72
Newman RG (1988) The buyer-supplier relationship under just in time. Prod Inventory Manage J 29(3):45–49
Nydick RL, Hill RP (1992) Using the analytic hierarchy process to structure the supplier selection procedure. Int J Purchas Mater Manage 28(2):31–36
Ramasesh RV (1990) Recasting the traditional inventory model to implement just in time purchasing. Prod Inventory Manage J 31(1):71–75
Sadrian AA, Yoon YS (1994) A procurement decision support system in business volume discount environments. Oper Res 42(1):14–23
Croom S, Romano P, Giannakis M (2000) Supply chain management: an analytical framework. Eu J Purchas Supply Chain Manage 6:67–83
Smytka DL, Clemens MW (1993) Total cost supplier selection model: a case study. Int J Purchas Mater Manage 29(1):42–49
Talluri S (2002) A buyer–seller game model for selection and negotiation of purchasing bids. Eu J Oper Res 143(1):171–180
Talluri S, Narasimhan R (2003) Vendor evaluation with performance variability: a max-min approach. Eu J Oper Res 146:543–552
Tayur S, Ganeshan R (1999) Quantitative models for supply chain management. Kluwer, Dordrecht
Weber CA, Current JR, Benton WC (1991) Vendor selection criteria and methods. Eu J Oper Res 50:2–18
Weber CA, Current JR (1993) A multiobjective approach to vendor selection. Eu J Oper Res 68:173–184
Weber CA, Current JR, Desai A (1998) Non-cooperative negotiation strategies for vendor selection. Eu J Oper Res 108:208–223
Weber CA, Current JR, Desai A (2000) An optimization approach to determining the number of vendors to employ. Supply Chain Manage Int J 5(2):90–98
Gao Z, Tang L (2003) A multi-objective model for purchasing of bulk raw materials of a large-scale integrated steel plant. Int J Prod Econ 83(3):325–334
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Arunkumar, N., Karunamoorthy, L., Anand, S. et al. Linear approach for solving a piecewise linear vendor selection problem of quantity discounts using lexicographic method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 28, 1254–1260 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-004-2474-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-004-2474-z