Skip to main content
Log in

The superficial medial collateral ligament reconstruction of the knee: effect of altering graft length on knee kinematics and stability

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the resulting knee kinematics and stability of an anatomic superficial MCL (sMCL) reconstruction and a non-anatomic sMCL reconstruction.

Methods

In a cadaveric model, normal knee stability and kinematics were compared with sMCL deficient knees and with two experimental sMCL reconstructions. The first reconstruction (AnatRecon) attempted to anatomically reconstruct the sMCL. The second reconstruction (ShortRecon) used a shorter graft to mimic the effect of failing to reproduce the anatomic length of the sMCL. Changes in position of the femur with respect to the tibia were measured with an electromagnetic tracking system during simulated active knee extension and during passive knee stability testing in the sMCL intact knee, the sMCL deficient knee, and the two experimental reconstructions.

Results

Simulated active knee extension demonstrated a significant increase in external tibial rotation of ShortRecon compared to AnatRecon between 30° and 80° of knee flexion (mean difference <3.0° over the range of knee flexion angles; P < 0.008), and a significant increase in external tibial rotation of ShortRecon compared to the intact sMCL was found at 60° and 70° of knee flexion (mean difference <2.0°over the range of knee flexion angles; P < 0.008). Passive joint stability testing demonstrated that division of the sMCL produced approximately 6° of valgus laxity at 30° of knee flexion and increased external tibial rotation of approximately 5° at 30°, 9° at 60°, and 10° at 90° of knee flexion, respectively. AnatRecon restored normal knee kinematics and stability. Additionally, passive stability testing demonstrated a significant increase in external tibial rotation of ShortRecon compared to AnatRecon at 60° (mean difference = 3.7°; P < 0.05) and 90° of knee flexion (mean difference = 4.9°; P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Anatomic reconstruction of the sMCL effectively restored knee kinematics and stability in the sMCL deficient knee. Altering the normal ligament length resulted in measurable changes in knee kinematics and stability. This study suggests that in cases of chronic valgus knee instability, anatomic sMCL reconstruction would provide better results than non-anatomic sMCL reconstruction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ballmer PM, Jakob RP (1988) The non operative treatment of isolated complete tears of the medial collateral ligament of the knee. A prospective study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 107:273–276

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Borden PS, Kantaras AT, Caborn DN (2002) Medial collateral ligament reconstruction with allograft using a double-bundle technique. Arthroscopy 18:E19

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bosworth DM (1952) Transplantation of the semitendinosus for repair of laceration of medial collateral ligament of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 34:196–202

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Coobs BR, Widjicks CA, Armitage BM et al (2010) An in vitro analysis of an anatomical medial knee reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 38:339–347

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ellsasser JC, Reynolds FC, Omohundro JR (1974) The non-operative treatment of collateral ligament injuries of the knee in professional football players. An analysis of seventy-four injuries treated non-operatively and twenty-four injuries treated surgically. J Bone Joint Surg Am 56:1185–1190

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Feeley BT, Muller MS, Allen AA et al (2009) Biomechanical comparison of medial collateral ligament reconstructions using computer-assisted navigation. Am J Sports Med 37:1123–1130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Griffith CJ, LaPrade RF, Johansen S et al (2009) Medial knee injury: part 1, static function of the individual components of the main medial knee structures. Am J Sports Med 37:1762–1770

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Grood ES, Noyes FR, Butler DL, Suntay WJ (1981) Ligamentous and capsular restraints preventing straight medial and lateral laxity in intact human cadaver knees. J Bone Joint Surg Am 63:1257–1269

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Haimes JL, Wroble RR, Grood ES, Noyes FR (1994) Role of the medial structures in the intact and anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee. Limits of motion in the human knee. Am J Sports Med 22:402–409

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hillard-Sembell D, Daniel DM, Stone ML et al (1996) Combined injuries of the anterior cruciate and medial collateral ligaments of the knee. Effect of treatment on stability and function of the joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78:169–176

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hughston JC (1994) The importance of the posterior oblique ligament in repairs of acute tears of the medial ligaments in knees with and without an associated rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament. Results of long-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 76:1328–1344

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hughston JC, Eilers AF (1973) The role of the posterior oblique ligament in repairs of acute medial (collateral) ligament tears of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 55:923–940

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Indelicato PA (1983) Non-operative treatment of complete tears of the medial collateral ligament of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 65:323–329

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Indelicato PA, Hermansdorfer J, Huegel M (1990) Nonoperative management of complete tears of the medial collateral ligament of the knee in intercollegiate football players. Clin Orthop Relat Res 256:174–177

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kannus P (1988) Long-term results of conservatively treated medial collateral ligament injuries of the knee joint. Clin Orthop Relat Res 226:103–112

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim SJ, Choi NH, Shin SJ (2001) Semitendinosus tenodesis for medial instability of the knee. Arthroscopy 17:660–663

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Milne AD, Chess DG, Johnson JA, King GJ (1996) Accuracy of an electromagnetic tracking device: a study of the optimal range and metal interference. J Biomech 29:791–793

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Nicholas JA (1973) The five-one reconstruction for anteromedial instability of the knee. Indications, technique, and the results in fifty-two patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 55:899–922

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Noyes FR, Barber-Westin SD (1995) The treatment of acute combined ruptures of the anterior cruciate and medial ligaments of the knee. Am J Sports Med 23:380–389

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. O’Donoghue DH (1973) Reconstruction for medial instability of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 55:941–954

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Reider B, Sathy MR, Talkington J et al (1994) Treatment of isolated medial collateral ligament injuries in athletes with early functional rehabilitation. A 5-year follow-up study. Am J Sports Med 22:470–477

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Robinson JR, Bull AM, Thomas RR, Amis AA (2006) The role of the medial collateral ligament and posteromedial capsule in controlling knee laxity. Am J Sports Med 34:1815–1823

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sharkey NA, Smith TS, Lundmark DC (1995) Freeze clamping musculo-tendinous junctions for in vitro simulation of joint mechanics. J Biomech 28:631–635

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Slocum DB, Larson RL (1968) Pes anserinus transplantation. A surgical procedure for control of rotatory instability of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 50:226–242

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Warren LF, Marshall JL (1979) The supporting structures and layers on the medial side of the knee: an anatomical analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 61:56–62

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Warren LF, Marshall JL, Girgis F (1974) The prime static stabilizer of the medical side of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 56:665–674

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Wijdicks CA, Griffith CJ, LaPrade RF et al (2009) Medial knee injury: part 2, load sharing between the posterior oblique ligament and superficial medial collateral ligament. Am J Sports Med 37:1771–1776

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wijdicks CA, Griffith CJ, Johansen S et al (2010) Injuries to the medial collateral ligament and associated medial structures of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92:1266–1280

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wijdicks CA, Ewart DT, Nuckley DJ et al (2010) Structural properties of the primary medial knee ligaments. Am J Sports Med 38:1638–1646

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Yoshiya S, Kuroda R, Mizuno K et al (2005) Medial collateral ligament reconstruction using autogenous hamstring tendons: technique and results in initial cases. Am J Sports Med 33:1380–1385

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. M. Van den Bogaerde.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Van den Bogaerde, J.M., Shin, E., Neu, C.P. et al. The superficial medial collateral ligament reconstruction of the knee: effect of altering graft length on knee kinematics and stability. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19 (Suppl 1), 60–68 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-011-1519-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-011-1519-8

Keywords

Navigation