Skip to main content
Log in

Attitudes and physical distance to an individual with schizophrenia: the moderating effect of self-transcendent values

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

There is evidence that personal value priorities may influence prejudicial behaviors. In particular, it has been hypothesized that those who place a high priority on values such as equality, benevolence and social justice may be less likely to express any prejudicial personal attitudes in behavior. In the present study, we tested this hypothesis in the context of physical distance with reference to a person with schizophrenia. Self-transcendent value priorities and attitudes toward a young woman described as having schizophrenia were assessed in 95 university students. They were then led to anticipate meeting the person and the distance they sat from the expected location of the ill person was assessed.

Results

Women sat closer to the anticipated seat of the person with schizophrenia. In addition, there was a significant interaction between priority placed on self-transcendent values and attitude toward the person in predicting seating distance. There was a significant relationship between favorability of attitudes and sitting closer for those who were low in self-transcendent values, but attitudes did not predict physical proximity for those with high self-transcendent values.

Conclusion

The impact of attitudes toward an individual with schizophrenia and subtle aspects of behavior such as physical proximity appear to be moderated by self-transcendent personal values. The role of implicit in comparison to explicit attitudes in explaining these results is worthy for further investigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hitlin S, Piliavin JA (2004) Values: Reviving a Dormant Concept. Annu Rev Sociol 30:359–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rohan MJ (2000) A rose by any name? The values construct. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 4:255–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Schwartz SH, Bilsky W (1987) Toward a universal psychological structure of human values. J Pers Soc Psychol 53:550–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Schwartz SH, Bilsky W (1990) Toward a theory of the universal content and structure of values: extensions and cross-cultural replications. J Pers Soc Psychol 58:878–891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Crano WD, Prislin R (2006) Attitudes and persuasion. In: Fiske ST, Kazdin AE, Schacter DL (eds) Annual Review of Psychology. Annual Reviews, Palo Alto, CA, pp 345–374

    Google Scholar 

  6. Eagly AH, Chaiken S (1993) The Psychology of Attitudes. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers, Orlando, FL

    Google Scholar 

  7. Corrigan P, Markowitz FE, Watson A, Rowan D, Kubiak MA (2003) An attribution model of public discrimination towards persons with mental illness. J Health Soc Behav 44:162–179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Link BG, Phelan JC, Bresnahan M, Stueve A, Pescosolido BA (1999) Public conceptions of mental illness: labels, causes, dangerousness, and social distance. Am J Public Health 89:1328–1333

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Griffiths KM, Nakane Y, Christensen H, Yoshioka K, Jorm AF, Nakane H (2006) Stigma in response to mental disorders: a comparison of Australia and Japan. BMC Psychiatry 6:21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Yang LH, Kleinman A, Link BG, Phelan JC, Lee S, Good B (2007) Culture and stigma: adding moral experience to stigma theory. Soc Sci Med 64:1524–1535

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Angermeyer MC, Matschinger H (1997) Social distance towards the mentally ill: results of representative surveys in the Federal Republic of Germany. Psychol Med 27:131–141

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Schomerus G, Matschinger H, Angermeyer MC (2006) Preferences of the public regarding cutbacks in expenditure for patient care: are there indications of discrimination against those with mental disorders? Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 41:369–377

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Norman RMG, Sorrentino RM, Windell D, Manchanda R (2008) Are personal values of importance in the stigmatization of the mentally ill. Can J Psychiatry 53:75–83

    Google Scholar 

  14. Schwartz SH, Bardi A (2001) Value hierarchies across cultures: Taking a similarities perspective. J Cross Cult Psychol 32:268–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Schwartz SH (2005) Basic human values: their content and structure across countries. In: Tamayo A, Porto JB (eds) Valores e Compertamento nas Organizacoes. Vozes, Petropolis, Brazil, pp 21–25

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schwartz SH (1992) Universals in the content and structure of values: theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In: Zanna M (ed) Advances in experimental social psychology. Academic Press, Orlando, pp 1–65

    Google Scholar 

  17. Grunert S, Juhl HJ (1995) Values, environmental attitudes, and buying of organic foods. J Econ Psychol 16:39–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Karp DG (1996) Values and their effect on pro-environmental behavior. Environ Behav 28:111–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Barnea MF, Schwartz SH (1998) Values and voting. Polit Psychol 19:17–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Duriez B, Luyten P, Snauwaert B, Hutsebaut D (2002) The importance of religiosity and values in predicting political attitudes: Evidence for the continuing importance of religiosity in Flanders (Belgium). Ment Health Relig Cult 5:35–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Helkama K, Uutela A, Schwartz S (1992) Value systems and political cognition. In: Breakwell GM (ed) Social Psychology of Political and Economic Cognition. Surrey University, London, pp 7–31

    Google Scholar 

  22. Schwartz S (1996) Value priorities and behavior: applying a theory of integrated value systems. In: Seligman C, Olson JM, Zanna MP (eds) The psychology of values: the Ontario symposium, vol 8. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, pp 1–24

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bond MH, Chi VM-Y (1997) Values and moral behavior in mainland China. Psychologia 40:251–264

    Google Scholar 

  24. Joireman J, Duell B (2007) Self-transcendent values moderate the impact of mortality salience on support for charities. Pers Individ Differ 43:779–789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hinshaw SP, Stier A (2008) Stigma as related to mental disorders. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 4:367–393

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Allgeier AR, Byrne D (1973) Attraction toward the opposite sex as a determinant of physical proximity. J Soc Psychol 90:213–219

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Gifford R, O’Connor B (1986) Nonverbal intimacy: clarifying the role of seating distance and orientation. J Nonverbal Behav 10:207–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Amodio DM, Devine PG (2006) Stereotyping and evaluation in implicit race bias: evidence for independent constructs and unique effects on behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol 91:652–661

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Barrios BA, Corbitt LC, Estes JP, Topping JS (1976) Effect of a social stigma on interpersonal distance. Psychol Rec 26:343–348

    Google Scholar 

  30. Bessenoff GR, Sherman JW (2000) Automatic and controlled components of prejudice toward fat people: Evaluation versus stereotype activation. Soc Cognit 18:329–353

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kleck R (1968) Physical stigma and nonverbal cues emitted in face-to-face interaction. Hum Relat 21:19–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Langer EJ, Fiske S, Taylor SE, Chanowitz B (1976) Stigma, staring, and discomfort: a novel-stimulus hypothesis. J Exp Soc Psychol 12:451–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. McConnell AR, Leibold JM (2001) Relations among the implicit association test, discriminatory behavior, and explicit measures of racial attitudes. J Exp Soc Psychol 37:435–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Haddock G, Zanna MP, Esses VM (1993) Assessing the structure of prejudicial attitudes: the case of attitudes toward homosexuals. J Pers Soc Psychol 65:1105–1118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Roccas S (2003) Identification and status revisited: the moderating role of self-enhancement and self-transcendence values. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 29:726–736

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Crandall CS, Eshleman A (2003) A justification-suppression model of the expression and experience of prejudice. Psychol Bull 129:414–446

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Devine PG, Monteith MJ (1993) The role of discrepancy-associated affect in prejudice reduction. In: Mackie DM, Hamilton DL (eds) Affect, Cognition, and Stereotyping: Interactive processes in group perception. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp 317–344

    Google Scholar 

  38. Gawronski B, Peters KR, Brochu PM, Strack F (2008) Understanding the relations between different forms of racial prejudice: a cognitive consistency perspective. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 34:648–665

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Hebl MR, Dovidio JF (2005) Promoting the “social” in the examination of social stigmas. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 9:156–182

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Lindeman M, Verkasalo M (2005) Measuring values with the short Schwartz’s value survey. J Pers Assess 85:170–178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Angermeyer MC, Beck M, Dietrich S, Holzinger A (2004) The stigma of mental illness: patients’ anticipations and experiences. Int J Soc Psychiatry 50:153–162

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Aronson E, Carlsmith JM (1968) Experimentation in social psychology. In: Lindzey G, Aronson E (eds) The handbook of social psychology. Addison-Wesley, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  43. Aiken LS, West SG (1991) Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  44. Green G, Hayes C, Dickinson D, Whittaker A, Gilheany B (2003) A mental health service users perspective to stigmatisation. J Ment Health 12:223–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Lloyd C, Sullivan D, Williams PL (2005) Perceptions of social stigma and its effect on interpersonal relationships of young males who experience a psychotic disorder. Aust Occup Ther J 52:243–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Schulze B, Angermeyer MC (2003) Subjective experiences of stigma. A focus group study of schizophrenic patients, their relatives and mental health professionals. Soc Sci Med 56:299–312

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Farina A, Ring K (1965) The Influence of Perceived Mental Illness on Interpersonal Relations. J Abnorm Psychol 70:47–51

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Farina A, Holland CH, Ring K (1966) Role of stigma and set in interpersonal interaction. J Abnorm Psychol 71:421–428

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Sibicky M, Dovidio JF (1986) Stigma of psychological therapy: stereotypes, interpersonal reactions, and the self-fulfilling prophecy. J Couns Psychol 33:148–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Weiner B, Perry RP, Magnusson J (1988) An attributional analysis of reactions to stigmas. J Pers Soc Psychol 55:738–748

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Biernat M, Vescio TK, Theno SA, Crandall CS (1996) Values and prejudice: toward understanding the impact of American values on outgroup attitudes. In: Seligman C, Olson JM, Zanna MP (eds) The psychology of human values: the ontario symposium. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 195–228

    Google Scholar 

  52. Dovidio JF, Gaertner SL (2004) Aversive Racism. In: Zanna MP (ed) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp 1–52

    Google Scholar 

  53. Katz I, Hass RG (1988) Racial ambivalence and American value conflict: Correlational and priming studies of dual cognitive structures. J Pers Soc Psychol 55:893–905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Gaertner SL, Dovidio JF (1986) The aversive form of racism. In: Dovidio JF, Gaertner SL (eds) Prejudice, discrimination, and racism. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 61–89

    Google Scholar 

  55. Plant EA, Devine PG (1998) Internal and external motivation to respond without prejudice. J Pers Soc Psychol 75:811–832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Greenwald AG, McGhee DE, Schwartz JL (1998) Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test. J Pers Soc Psychol 74:1464–1480

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Fazio RH, Jackson JR, Dunton BC, Williams CJ (1995) Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: a bona fide pipeline? J Pers Soc Psychol 69:1013–1027

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Friese M, Hoffmann W, Schmitt M (2008) When and why do implicit measures predict behavior? Evidence for the moderating role of opportunity, motivation, and process reliance. Eur Rev Psychol 19:285–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Dovidio JF, Kawakami K, Gaertner SL (2002) Implicit and explicit prejudice and interracial interaction. J Pers Soc Psychol 82:62–68

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Gawronski B, Bodenhausen GV (2006) Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: an integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychol Bull 132:692–731

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Strack F, Deutsch R (2004) Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 8:220–247

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Wilson TD, Lindsey S, Schooler TY (2000) A model of dual attitudes. Psychol Rev 107:101–126

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Norman RM, Sorrentino RM, Windell D, Manchanda R (2008) The role of perceived norms in the stigmatization of mental illness. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 43:851–859

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Grube JW, Mayton DM, Ball-Rokeach SJ (1994) Inducing changes in values, attitudes, and behaviors: Belief system theory and the method of value self-confrontation. J Soc Issues 50:153–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Rokeach M (1973) The nature of human values. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  66. Biernat M, Vescio TK, Theno SA (1996) Violating American values: a “value congruence” approach to understanding outgroup attitudes. J Exp Soc Psychol 32:387–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Hertel G, Kerr NL (2001) Priming in-group favoritism: The impact of normative scripts in the minimal group paradigm. J Exp Soc Psychol 37:316–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Maio GR, Olson JM, Allen L, Bernard MM (2001) Addressing discrepancies between values and behavior: the motivating effect of reasons. J Exp Soc Psychol 37:104–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Verplanken B, Holland RW (2002) Motivated decision making: effects of activation and self-centrality of values on choices and behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol 82:434–447

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Devine PG, Plant EA, Amodio DM, Harmon-Jones E, Vance SL (2002) The regulation of explicit and implicit race bias: The role of motivations to respond without prejudice. J Pers Soc Psychol 82:835–848

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Moskowitz GB, Gollwitzer PM, Wasel W, Schaal B (1999) Preconscious control of stereotype activation through chronic egalitarian goals. J Pers Soc Psychol 77:167–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Moskowitz GB, Salomon AR, Taylor C (2000) Implicit control of stereotype activation through the preconscious operation of chronic goals. Soc Cognit 18:151–177

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a grant from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ross M. G. Norman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Norman, R.M.G., Sorrentino, R.M., Gawronski, B. et al. Attitudes and physical distance to an individual with schizophrenia: the moderating effect of self-transcendent values. Soc Psychiat Epidemiol 45, 751–758 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-009-0117-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-009-0117-2

Keywords

Navigation