Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Host intra-clutch variation, cuckoo egg matching and egg rejection by great reed warblers

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Naturwissenschaften Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Prevailing theory predicts that lower levels of intra-clutch variation in host eggs facilitate the detection of brood parasitism. We assessed egg matching using both human vision and UV-VIS spectrophotometry and then followed the nest fate of great reed warblers naturally parasitised by European cuckoos. Rejection was predicted by the following three variables: matching between cuckoo and host eggs on the main chromatic variable defined by principal components analysis of the egg spectra (which has a strong loading in the UV); the number of host eggs in the nest; and human estimates of intra-clutch variation. The first variable is not correlated to human estimates of matching, which do not predict rejection. In line with another recent study, rejection rates were predicted by higher levels of intra-clutch variation in the host eggs, suggesting that higher rather than lower levels of intra-clutch variation can facilitate the discrimination of cuckoo eggs by hosts. We suggest that the importance of intra-clutch variation is context dependent, with intra-clutch variation being important when there is good matching between the host and the cuckoo eggs. Our results also suggest that both spectrometric and human visual assessments of egg matching and intra-clutch variation are prudent: the former provide the best method of estimating reflectance variation, whereas the latter include some assessment of patterns of maculation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersson S, Amundsen T (1997) Ultraviolet colour vision and ornamentation in bluethroats. Proc R Soc Lond B 264:1587–1591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson S, Ornberg J, Andersson M (1998) Ultraviolet sexual dimorphism and assortative mating in blue tits. Proc R Soc Lond B 265:445–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avilés JM, Møller AP (2003) Meadow pipit (Anthus pratensis) egg appearance in cuckoo (Cuculus canorus) sympatric and allopatric populations. Biol J Linn Soc 79:459–543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avilés JM, Møller AP (2004) How is host egg mimicry maintained in the cuckoo (Cuculus canorus)? Biol J Linn Soc 82:57–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avilés JM, Soler JJ, Soler M, Møller AP (2004) Rejection of parasitic eggs in relation to egg appearance in magpies. Anim Behav 67:951–958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avilés JM, Soler JJ, Pérez-Contreras T, Soler M, Møller AP (2006) Ultraviolet reflectance of great spotted cuckoo eggs and egg discrimination by magpies. Behav Ecol 17:310–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett ATD, Cuthill IC (1994) Ultraviolet vision in birds: what is its function? Vis Res 34:1471–1478

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett ATD, Théry M (2007) Avian color vision and coloration: multidisciplinary evolutionary biology. Am Nat 169:S1–S6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett ATD, Cuthill IC, Norris KJ (1994) Sexual selection and the mismeasure of color. Am Nat 144:848–860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett ATD, Cuthill IC, Partridge JC, Maier EJ (1996) Ultraviolet vision and mate choice in zebra finches. Nature 380:433–435

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett ATD, Cuthill IC, Partridge JC, Lunau EJ (1997) Ultraviolet plumage colors predict mate preferences in starlings. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:8618–8621

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brooke MdL, Davies NB (1988) Egg mimicry by cuckoos Cuculus canorus in relation to discrimination by hosts. Nature 335:630–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherry MI, Bennett ATD (2001a) Egg colour matching in an African cuckoo, as revealed by ultraviolet-visible reflectance spectrophotometry. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:565–571

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cherry MI, Bennett ATD (2001b) Egg colour matching in an African cuckoo, as revealed by ultraviolet-visible reflectance spectrophotometry. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:2616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clayton NS, Bussey TJ, Dickinson A (2003) Can animals recall the past and plan for the future? Nat Rev Neurosci 4:685–691

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cuthill IC, Bennett ATD, Partridge JC, Maier EJ (1999) Plumage reflectance and the objective assessment of avian dichromatism. Am Nat 153:183–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies NB (2000) Cuckoos, cowbirds and other cheats. Poyser, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies NB, Brooke MdL (1988) Cuckoos versus reed warblers: adaptations and counteradaptations. Anim Behav 36:262–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies NB, Brooke MdL (1989) An experimental study of co-evolution between the cuckoo Cuculus canorus and its hosts II Host egg markings, chick discrimination and general discussion. J Anim Ecol 58:225–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endler JA, Théry M (1996) Interacting effects of lek placement, display behavior, ambient light, and color patterns in three neotropical forest-dwelling birds. Am Nat 148:421–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauber ME, Sherman PW (2001) Self-referent phenotype matching: theoretical considerations and empirical evidence. Trends Neurosci 24:609–616

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hauber ME, Moskát C, Bán M (2006) Experimental shift in hosts’ acceptance threshold of inaccurate-mimic brood parasite eggs. Biol Lett 2:177–180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Honza M, Procházka P, Stokke BG, Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Čapek M Jr, Mrlík V (2004) Are blackcaps current winners in the evolutionary struggle against the common cuckoo? J Ethol 22:175–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt S, Bennett ATD, Cuthill IC, Griffiths R (1998) Blue tits are ultraviolet tits. Proc R Soc Lond B 265:451–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karcza Z, Moskát C, Cherry MI, Kisbenedek T (2003) Experimental manipulation of intraclutch variation in the great reed warbler shows no effect on rejection behaviour of parasitic eggs. Ethology 109:15–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lahti DC, Lahti AR (2002) How precise is egg discrimination in weaverbirds? Anim Behav 63:1135–1142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lotem A, Nakamura H, Zahavi A (1992) Rejection of cuckoo eggs in relation to host age: a possible evolutionary equilibrium. Behav Ecol 3:128–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lotem A, Nakamura H, Zahavi A (1995) Constraints on egg discrimination and cuckoo–host co-evolution. Anim Behav 49:1185–1209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovászi P, Moskát C (2004) Break-down of arms race between the red-backed shrike (Lanius collurio) and the common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus). Behaviour 141:245–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahler BA, Kempenaers B (2000) Objective assessment of sexual plumage dichromatism in the Picui Dove. Condor 104:248–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moksnes A, Røskaft E (1995) Egg-morphs and host preference in the common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus): an analysis of cuckoo and host eggs from European museum collections. J Zool (Lond) 236:625–648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moskát C, Honza M (2002) European Cuckoo Cuculus canorus parasitism and host’s rejection behaviour in a heavily parasitized Great Reed Warbler Acrocephalus arundinaceus population. Ibis 144:614–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Øien IJ, Moksnes A, Røskaft E (1995) Evolution of variation in egg color and marking pattern in European passerines: adaptations in a coevolutionary arms race with the cuckoo, Cuculus canorus. Behav Ecol 6:166–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Procházka P, Honza M (2003) Do common whitethroats (Sylvia communis) discriminate against alien eggs? J Ornithol 144:354–363

    Google Scholar 

  • Procházka P, Honza M (2004) Egg discrimination in the yellowhammer. Condor 106:405–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein SI (1974) Mechanisms of avian egg recognition: possible learned and innate factors. Auk 91:796–807

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein SI (1975) Mechanisms of avian egg recognition: do birds know their own eggs? Anim Behav 23:268–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein SI (1978) Mechanisms of avian egg-recognition: additional evidence for learned components. Anim Behav 26:671–677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon BC, Andersson S, Griffith SC, Ornborg J, Sendecka J (1999) Ultraviolet colour variation influences blue tit sex ratios. Nature 402:874–877

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Siitari H, Viitala J (2002) Behavioural evidence for ultraviolet vision in a tetraonid species foraging experiment with black grouse Tetrao tetrix. J Avian Biol 33:199–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soler JJ, Soler M, Møller AP (2000) Host recognition of parasite eggs and the physical appearance of host eggs: the magpie and its brood parasite the great spotted cuckoo. Etologia 8:9–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Soler JJ, Aviles JM, Soler M, Møller AP (2003) Evolution of host egg mimicry in a brood parasite, the great spotted cuckoo. Biol J Linn Soc 79:551–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stokke BG, Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Rudolfsen G, Honza M (1999) Rejection of artificial cuckoo eggs in relation to variation in egg appearance among reed warblers. Proc R Soc Lond B 266:1483–1488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stokke BG, Rudolfsen G, Moksnes A, Røskaft E (2004) Rejection of conspecific eggs in chaffinches: the effect of age and clutch characteristics. Ethology 110:459–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stokke BG, Moksnes A, Røskaft E (2005) The enigma of imperfect adaptations in hosts of avian brood parasites. Ornithol Sci 4:17–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swynnerton CF (1918) Rejections by birds of eggs unlike their own: with remarks on some of the cuckoo problems. Ibis 6:127–154, (10th Series)

    Google Scholar 

  • Victoria JK (1972) Clutch characteristics and egg discriminate ability of the African village weaverbird Ploceus cucullatus. Ibis 114:367–376

    Google Scholar 

  • Viitala J, Korpimaki E, Palokangas P, Koivula M (1995) Attraction of kestrels to vole scent marks visible in ultraviolet light. Nature 373:425–427

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the National Research Foundation of South Africa, the Oppenheimer Trust (MIC), the Royal Society (MIC and ATDB), the BBSRC and the Leverhulme Trust (ATDB) and the Hungarian Scientific Research Fund (grants T35015 and T48397: CM). We thank the students and staff from the universities of Bristol and Stellenbosch for assessing eggs; Michael Brooke, Kate Buchanan, Nick Davies, Matthew Evans, Martin Gopfert, Arnon Lotem, Marta Manser and Lynda Sharpe for the useful discussions; three anonymous reviewers for their comments on the manuscript; and Zsolt Karcza and Tibor Kisbenedek for their assistance in the field.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Botany and Zoology, University of Stellenbosch, Private Bag X1, Matieland, 7602, South Africa

    Michael I. Cherry

  2. School of Biological Sciences, Bristol University, Bristol, BS8 1UG, UK

    Andrew T. D. Bennett

  3. Animal Ecology Research Group of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Hungarian Natural History Museum, Budapest, Ludovika ter 2, 1083, Hungary

    Csaba Moskát

Authors
  1. Michael I. Cherry
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andrew T. D. Bennett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Csaba Moskát
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael I. Cherry.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cherry, M.I., Bennett, A.T.D. & Moskát, C. Host intra-clutch variation, cuckoo egg matching and egg rejection by great reed warblers. Naturwissenschaften 94, 441–447 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-007-0216-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-007-0216-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation