Skip to main content
Log in

Progress in Implantable Gastric Stimulation: Summary of Results of the European Multi-Center Study

  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The Implantable Gastric Stimulator (IGS®), a pacemaker-like device, has been found to be safe and effective to induce and maintain weight loss. The LOSS (Laparoscopic Obesity Stimulation Survey) is a prospective non-randomized trial which enrolled 69 patients involving 11 investigator centers in 5 European Countries. In 19 patients, ghrelin was analyzed.

Methods

Between January 2002 and December 2003, 69 patients (F/M 49/20), mean age 41 years (18–65) underwent IGS implantation. Mean BMI was 41 (35–57), mean weight 115.0 kg (65–160) and mean excess weight (EW) 52 kg (13–89). The IGS was actived 30 days after implantation. In a subset of 19 patients studied further, 0, 6, and 12 months appetite and satiety score were evaluated and 0 and 6 months ghrelin profile was analyzed.

Results

The mean ± standard error %EWL was: 8.6±1.8 at 1 month, 15.8±2.3 at 3 months, 17.8±2.6 at 6 months, 21.0±3.5 at 10 months, and 21.0±5.0 at 15 months. There were no intraoperative surgical or long-term complications. 7 intra-operative gastric penetrations occurred, observed by gastroscopy, without sequelae. 1 patient required a reoperation to remove a retained lead needle. In the subset of 19 patients, appetite was reduced and post-prandial and inter-prandial satiety was increased after IGS implantation. In the 19 patients, despite weight reduction, ghrelin did not increase.

Conclusion

IGS can be implanted laparoscopically with minimal perioperative complications. Appetite is reduced and satiety is increased after the implantation. Ghrelin levels could be one of the mechanisms explaining weight loss and weight maintenance in IGS patients. If weight loss is maintained, IGS could be considered a good option for selected patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cigaina V, Saggioro A, Rigo V et al. Long-term effects of gastric pacing to reduce food intake in swine. Obes Surg 1996; 6: 250–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cigaina V, Saggioro A, Pezzangora V. The long-term effects of gastric pacing on an obese young woman. Obes Surg 1996; 6:312–3 (abst 41).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cigaina V, Pinato GP, Rigo V et al. Gastric peristalsis control by mono situ electrical stimulation: a preliminary study. Obes Surg 1996;6:247–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cigaina V, Adler S, Rigo V et al. Implantable gastric stimulator (IGS) as therapy for morbid obesity: equipment, surgical technique and stimulation parameters. Obes Surg 1999; 9: 357–8 (abst 136A).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cigaina V, Saggioro A, Gracco L et al. Gastric pacemaker to treat morbid obesity — five year experience. Obes Surg 2001; 11: 171 (abst P8).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Favretti F, De Luca M, Segato G et al. Treatment of morbid obesity with the Transcend® Implantable Gastric Stimulator (IGS®): A prospective survey. Obes Surg 14, 2004 666–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Busetto L, De Luca M, Favretti F et al. Ghrelin levels before and after weight loss in morbidly obese patients treated by an implantable electrical gastric stimulator. JAMA (in press).

  8. D’Argent J. Gastric electrical stimulation as therapy of morbid obesity: preliminary results of the French study. Obes Surg 2002; 12: 21S-25S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. McCallum RW, Chen JD, Lin Z et al. Gastric pacing improves emptying and symptoms in patients with gastroparesis. Gastroenterology 1998; 114: 456–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cigaina V, Hirschberg A. Gastric pacing and neuroendocrine response: a preliminary report. Obes Surg 2000; 10: 334 (abst 89).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Xing JH, Brody F, Brodsky J et al. Gastric electrical stimulation at proximal stomach induces gastric relaxation in dogs. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2003; 15(1): 15–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ouyang H, Yin J, Chen JD. Therapeutic potential of gastric electrical stimulation for obesity and its possible mechanism: a preliminary canine study. Dig Dis Sci 2003; 48: 698–705.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen JD, Qian L, Ouyang H et al. Gastric electrical stimulation with short pulses reduces vomiting but not dysrhythmias in dogs. Gastroenterology 2003; 124: 401–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Phillips RJ, Powley TL. Gastric volume rather than nutrient content inhibits food intake. Am J Physiol 1996; 271: R766–R779.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cummings DE, Weigle DS, Frayo RS et al. Plasma ghrelin levels after diet-induced weight loss or gastric bypass surgery. N Engl J Med 2002; 346: 1623–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Favretti F, Cadiere GB, Segato G et al. Laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding (Lap-Band®): How to avoid complications. Obes Surg 1997; 7: 352–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maurizio De Luca MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

De Luca, M., Segato, G., Busetto, L. et al. Progress in Implantable Gastric Stimulation: Summary of Results of the European Multi-Center Study. OBES SURG 14 (Suppl 1), S33–S39 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03342136

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03342136

Key words

Navigation