Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The role of major genes in the evolution of economic characters

  • Published:
Journal of Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abraham, P. (1934).Proc. Assoc. Econ. Biol. Coimbatore,2, 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Afzal, M. &Hutchinson, J. B. (1933).Indian J. Agric. Sci. 3, 1124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Åkerman, Å. (1936).Züchter,8, 25–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrus, C. F. &Reynard, G. B. (1945).Phytopathology,35, 16–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (1944–5).Prog. Rep. Cott. Genet. Res. Scheme, Indore, C. I. 1944–5. (Mimeograph.)

  • Anonymous (1942).Bull. Mass. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 338.

  • Ayyangar, G. N. R. &Hariharan, P. V. (1936).Madras Agric. J. 24, 235–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayyangar, G. N. R. &Ponnaiya, B. W. X. (1939a).Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. 10, B, 237–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayyangar, G. N. R. &Ponnaiya, B. W. X. (1939b).Curr. Sci. 8, 418–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayyangar, G. N. R. &Rao, P. K. (1938).Madras Agric. J.,26, 195–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayyangar, G. N. R. &Sarma, P. S. (1933).Indian J. Agric. Sci. 3, 557–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayyangar, G. N. R., Ayyar, M. A. S. &Nambiar, A. K. (1937).Madras Agric. J. 25, 107–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayyangar, G. N. R., Narayanan, T. R. &Rao, T. N. (1933).Indian J. Agric. Sci. 3, 207–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayyangar, G. N. R., Ayyar, M. A. S., Rao, V. P. &Nambiar, A. K. (1936).Madras Agric. J. 24, 247–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayyangar, G. N. R., Vijiaraghavan, G., Ayyar, M. A. S. &Rao, V. P. (1934).Indian J. Agric. Sci. 4, 96–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayyar, R. V. &Iyer, B. R. (1936).Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. 3, B, 438–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, J. S. &French, A. P. (1932).Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 29, 127–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, R. M. (1939).Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 36 (1938), 645–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbacki, S. (1930).Mém. Inst. polon Econ. rur. 11, 579–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrons, K. C. (1940).J. Hered. 31, 35–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biffen, R. H. (1905).J. Agric. Sci. 1 4–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, W. (1945).Ann. Appl. Biol. 32, 279–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blank, L. M. &Walker, J. C. (1933).J. Agric. Res. 46, 1015–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohn, G. W. &Tucker, C. M. (1940).Research Bull. Mo. Agric. Exp. Sta. 311, 1–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, D. H., Martin, J. H., Melchers, L. E. &Parker, J. H. (1937).J. Agric. Res. 55, 105–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Branas, J., Bernon, G. &Levadoux, L. (1938).Plant Breed. Abstr. 10, 308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bremer, A. H. &Grana, J. (1935).Plant Breed. Abstr. 6, 90–1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, F. N. (1931).J. Agric. Res. 42, 307–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkholder, W. H. (1918).Phytopathology,8, 353–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cockerham, G. (1943).Ann. Appl. Biol. 30, 105–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corkill, L. (1942).N. Z. J. Sci. Tech. 23, 178b-193b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, M. B. &Lawrence, W. J. C. (1931).J. Genet. 24, 243–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crescint, F. (1933).Ann. Tec. Agr., Roma,6, 36–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Currence, T. M. (1932).Proc. 6th Int. Congr. Genet. N.Y.,2, 32–4 (Abstr.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahms, R. G. (1943).J. Amer. Soc. Agron. 35, 704–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deshpande, R. B. (1935).Indian J. Agric. Sci. 5, 513–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, S. M. &Murphy, H. C. (1930a).Phytopathology (Abstr.),20, 119–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, S. M. &Murphy, H. C. (1930b).Phytopathology (Abstr.),20 120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dundas, B. (1939).Phytopathology,29, 824.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durst, C. E. (1930).Bull. Ill. Agric. Exp. Sta. 356, 239–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • East, E. M. (1932).Genetics,17, 175–202.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Emsweller, S. L. (1932).Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 29, 480–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fedorova, N. Ja. (1935).Plant Breed. Abstr.,6, 434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. A. (1930).The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florell, V. H. (1931).J. Agric. Res. 43, 365–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franzke, C. J., Puhr, L. F. &Hume, A. N. (1939).Tech. Bull. S. Dak. St. Coll., no. 1, pp. 1–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frimmel, F. &Lauche, K. (1938).Plant Breed. Abstr. 9, 127–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaines, E. F. &Smith, W. K. (1933).J. Amer. Soc. Agron. 25, 273–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E. F. (1936).Phytopathology,26, 382–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackbarth, J. (1938).Plant Breed. Abstr. 9, 76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackbarth, J. &Sengbusch, R. von (1934).Plant Breed. Abstr. 5, 234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackbarth, J. &Sengbusch, R. von (1935).Plant Breed. Abstr. 5, 247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harland, S. C. (1934).Emp. Cott. Gr. Rev. 11, 301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harland, S. C. (1939).The Genetics of Cotton. London: Jonathan Cape.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harland, S. C. (1946). Reported inNature, Lond.,157, 36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauge, S. M. &Trost, J. F. (1930).J. Biol. Chem. 86, 167–72.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, H. K. &Immer, F. R. (1942).Methods of Plant Breeding. New York and London: MacGraw-Hill Book Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, A. W. (1930).Phytopathology,20, 707–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, B. B. (1938).Proc. 39th Ann. Convent. Ass. S. Agric. Wlers., Atlanta, Ga. pp. 57–8 (Abstr.).

  • Holmes, F. O. (1937).Phytopathology,27, 637–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, F. O. (1938).Phytopathology,28, 553–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houston, B. R. &Stanford, B. H. (1945).Plant Dis. Rep. 29, 572–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, J. A. (1931).Z. Zücht. A,16, 394–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, F. H. (1937).Tech. Bull. Fla. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 314, 46 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husfeld, B. (1930).Plant Breed. Abstr. 2, 93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, J. B., Silow, R. A. & Stephens, S. G. (1947).The Evolution of ‘Gossypium’. Oxford University Press.

  • Jagger, I. C. (1940).Phytopathology,30, 53–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jagger, I. C. &Whitaker, T. W. (1940).Phytopathology,30, 427–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jagger, I. C., Whitaker, T. W. &Porter, D. R. (1938).Phytopathology,28, 671.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasnowski, S. (1935).Plant Breed. Abstr. 6, 263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasnowski, S. (1938).Arch. Nauk. Biol. 8, Fasc.3, pp. 1–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, H. W. &Hollowell, E. A. (1935).J. Agric. Res. 51, 371–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, I. J. &Åberg, E. (1943).J. Amer. Soc. Agron. 35, 101–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, H. A. (1932).Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 29, 572–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J. W. (1933).J. Agric. Res. 47, 771–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadam, B. S. &Patankar, V. K. (1938).Chron. Bot. 4, 496–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karper, R. E. (1932).Amer. Nat. 66, 511–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karper, R. E. (1933).J. Hered. 24, 257–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasiwada, S. (1930).Plant Breed. Abstr. 1, no. 4, 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearney, T. H. (1930).J. Agric. Res. 41, 349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, R. L. (1944).J. Genet. 46, 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, R. L. (1946).Emp. J. Exp. Agric. 14, 153–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, R. L. (1947).J. Genet. 48, 43–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, R. L. &Clouston, T. W. (1939).J. Genet. 38 133–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, R. L. &Clouston, T. W. (1941).J. Genet. 41, 391–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krantz, F. A. &Eide, C. J. (1941).J. Agric. Res. 63, 219–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuckuck, H. (1930).Züchter,2, 68–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lada, P. (1933).Plant Breed. Abstr. 5, 118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langham, D. G. (1945).J. Hered. 36, 245–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Love, H. H. &McRostie, G. P. (1919).Amer. Nat. 53, 5–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lysenko, T. D. (1946).Heredity and its Variability. New York: King's Crown Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur, J. W. (1931).Trans. Roy. Soc. Can. 18, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mains, E. B. (1931).J. Agric. Res. 43, 419–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mains, E. B. (1934).Phytopathology,24, 1257–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maroy, D. E. (1937).Plant Breed. Abstr. 7, Abstr. 1261, p. 400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mather, K. (1943a).Nature, London.,151, 68–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mather, K. (1943b).Biol. Rev. 18, 32–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mather, K. &Barton-Wright, E. C. (1946).Nature, London.,157, 109–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Melchers, L. E. &Parker, J. H. (1922).Phytopathology (Abstr.),12, 31–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miczynski, K. (1930).Polish Agric. and Forests. Ann. 23, 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. C. &Fineman, Z. M. (1938).Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. (1937),35, 544–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitra, S. K. &Ganguli, P. M. (1932).Indian J. Agric. Sci. 2, 271–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyake, M. (1938).Jap. J. Genet. 14, 239–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miyazawa, B. (1934).Proc. Crop. Sci. Soc. Japan,6, 156–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, R. C. (1940).Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. (1939), 1940,37, 242–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moormann, B. (1942).Plant Breed. Abstr. 15, 35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munerati, O. (1931).Plant Breed. Abstr. 2, 78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagai, I. &Hara, S. (1930).Jap. J. Genet. 5, 140–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nahmmacher, J. (1931).Phytopath. Z. 4, 597–630.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamori, E. (1936).Pl. Breed. News, pp. 823–34.

  • Nilsson, E. (1932).Plant Breed. Abstr. 2, 215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nohara, S. (1933).J. Coll. Agric. Tokyo,12, 228–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Kelly, J. F. & Hull, W. W. (1930).Tech. Bull. Miss. Agric. Exp. Sta. 18.

  • Owen, F. V. (1938).Plant Breed. Abstr. 9, 93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, F. V. & Aregg, F. A. (1938).Proc. Amer. Soc. Sug. Beet. Tech. p. 72 (Abstr.).

  • Patel, J. S., John, C. M. &Seshadri, C. R. (1936).Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. 3, B, 214–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel, Z. H. (1941).Proc. 28th Indian Sci. Congr. Benares, PtIII, Sect. Agric. Abstr.40, 258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, W. H. &Walker, J. C. (1933).Canner,77, 7–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plaček, E. M. (1936).Plant Breed. Abstr. 7, 322–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platt, A. W., Darroch, J. G. &Kemp, H. J. (1941).Sci. Agric. 22, 216–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poole, C. F. (1944).J. Hered. 35, 122–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, D. R. (1937).Hilgardia,10, 489–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powers, L. &Hines, L. (1933).J. Agric. Res. 46, 1121–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prakken, R. (1934).Genetica,16, 177–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, L. G. (1942).Sci. Agric. 22, 594–607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinby, J. R. &Karper, R. E. (1945).J. Amer. Soc. Agron. 37, 916–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramiah, K. (1930).Mem. Dep. Agric. India. Bot. 18, 211–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramiah, K. &Dharmalingam, S. (1934).Indian J. Agric. Sci. 4, 880–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramiah, K. &Ramaswami, K. (1936).Proc. Ind. Acad. Sci. 3, B, 450–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramiah, K. &Ramaswami, K. (1941).Indian J. Agric. Sci. 11, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramiah, K., Jobitharaj, S. &Mudaliar, S. D. (1931).Mem. Dep. Agric. India. Bot. 18, 229–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raum, H. (1931).Z. Zücht. A 16, 161–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, G. M. (1932).Proc. 6th Int. Cong. Genet. N.Y. 2, 164–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynard, G. B. &Andrus, C. F. (1945).Phytopathology,35, 25–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riehm (1940).Plant Breed. Abstr. 13, 15–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieman, G. H. (1930).Phytopathology,20, 115–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieman, G. H. (1931).J. Agric. Res. 42, 251–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saboe, L. C. &Hayes, H. K. (1941).J. Amer. Soc. Agron. 33, 463–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salaman, R. N. &Lesley, J. W. (1923).J. Genet. 13, 177–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sansome, F. W. (1939).Recent Advances in Plant Genetics, 2nd ed., London: J. and A. Churchill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber, F. (1932).Plant Breed. Abstr. 2, 213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sengbusch, R. von (1938).Plant Breed. Abstr. 8, 370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senn, P. H. (1932).Phytopathology,22, 675–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, F. J. F. (1936).Indian J. Agric. Sci. 6, 139–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, F. J. F. &Bose, R. D. (1933).Indian J. Agric. Sci. 3, 771–807.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen, T. H. (1934).Bull. Coll. Agric. For. Nanking, no. 17 (N.S.), pp. 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shifriss, O., Myers, C. H. &Chupp, C. (1942).Phytopathology,32, 773–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sieglinger, J. B. (1932).J. Agric. Res. 44, 13–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sieglinger, J. B., Swanson, A. F. &Martin, J. H. (1934).J. Agric. Res. 49, 663–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinnott, E. W. &Hammond, D. (1930).Amer. Nat. 64, 509–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sirks, M. J. (1931).Plant Breed. Abstr. 2, 218–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiegelmann, S., Lindegren, C. C. &Lindegren, A. (1945). Reported inNature, Lond.,157, 448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stene, A. E. &Odland, T. E. (1938).Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. (1937),35, 54–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, J. C. &Quinby, J. R. (1938).J. Agric. Res. 57, 747–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, T. M. &White, W. J. (1940).Sci. Agric. 21, 18–28.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Straib, W. (1937).Züchter,9, 305–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘Student’ (1933).Eugen. Rev. 24, 293.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘Student’ (1934).Ann. Eugen. 6, 77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stummer, A. &Frimmel, F. (1932).Plant Breed. Abstr. 3, 214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swenson, S. P. &Wells, D. G. (1944).J. Amer. Soc. Agron. 36, 429–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi, N. (1934).Plant Breed. Abstr. 5, 267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tavčar, A. (1935).Plant Breed. Abstr. 6, 165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tavčar, A. (1939).Plant Breed. Abstr. 12, 177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thadani, K. I. (1923).Agric. J. India,18, 572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ting, Y. (1933).Agron. Bull. Coll. Agric. Sun Yatsen Univ. Publ. Ser.III 3, 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tingey, D. C. (1934).J. Agric. Res. 48, 631–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torres, J. P. (1937).Philipp. J. Agric. 8, 27–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullstrup, A. J. (1941).J. Agric. Res. 63, 331–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, B. L. &Zaumeyer, W. J. (1940).J. Amer. Soc. Agron. 32, 127–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, B. L., Zaumeyer, W. J. &Harter, L. L. (1938).Circ. U.S. Dep. Agric. no. 473, pp. 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, J. C. (1930).J. Agric. Res. 40, 721–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, J. C., Delwiohe, E. J. &Hare, W. W. (1944).Phytopathology (Abstr.),34, 1013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterhouse, W. L. (1930).Proc. Linn. Soc., N.S.W.,55, 595–636.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, A. E. &Cory, F. M. (1931).J. Genet. 25, 55–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weetman, L. M. (1937).Res. Bull. Ia Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 228, 223–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellhausen, E. J. (1937).Res. Bull. Ia Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 224, pp. 73–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitaker, T. W. &Pryor, D. E. (1941).Phytopathology,31, 534–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wingard, S. A. (1933).Bull. Va. Agric. Exp. Sta. 51.

  • Woodworth, C. M. (1932).Bull. Ill. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 384, pp. 297–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worzella, W. W. (1934).J. Agric. Res. 49, 705–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeager, A. F. (1937).J. Agric. Res. 55, 141–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, T. F. (1942).Science Rec., Chungking,1, nos. 1 and 2, pp. 248–50.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Empire Cotton Growing Corporation and Sudan Government, Sudan

    R. L. Knight

Authors
  1. R. L. Knight
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Knight, R.L. The role of major genes in the evolution of economic characters. Journ. of Genetics 48, 370–387 (1948). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02986637

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02986637

Keywords

Search

Navigation