Abstract
The Viewpoint column offers mathematicians the opportunity to write about any issue of interest to the international mathematical community. Disagreement and controversy are welcome. The views and opinions expressed here, however, are exclusively those of the author, and neither the publisher nor the editor-in-chief endorses or accepts responsibility for them. Viewpoint should be submitted to the editor-in-chief, Chandler Davis.
Similar content being viewed by others
Bibliography
Bacharach, M. 1883.Abriss zur Geschichte der Potentialtheorie, Würzburg: Thein.
Beller, M. 1983. ‘Matrix theory before Schrödinger’,Isis 74, 469–491.
Colyvan, M. 2001. ‘The miracle of applied mathematics’,Synthese 127, 265–277.
Chabert, J. L. et al. 1999.A history of algorithms. From the pebble to the microchip, Berlin: Springer.
Corry, L. 1996.Modern algebra and the rise of mathematical structures, Basel: Birkhauser.
Dantzig, G. B. 1982. ‘Reminiscences about the origins of linear programming’,Operational research letters. I, 43–48. [Slightly rev. ed. in A. Bachem, M. Grotschel, and B. Corte (eds.),Mathematical programming. The state of the art, Berlin: Springer, 1983, 78–86.].
Dilworth, C. 1994.Scientific progress, Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Dyson, F. 1972. ‘Missed opportunities’,Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 78, 635–652.
Enriques, F. 1906.The problems of science, Chicago and London: Open Court.
French, S. 2000. ‘The reasonable effectiveness of mathematics: partial structures and the application of group theory to physics’,Synthese 125, 103–120.
Fresnel, A. J. 1866.Oeuvres completes, vol. 1, Paris: Imprimerie Impériale.
Grattan-Guinness, I. 1990.Convolutions in French mathematics, 1800–1840. From the calculus and mechanics to mathematical analysis and mathematical physics, 3 vols., Basel: Birkhäuser; Berlin: Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften.
Grattan-Guinness, I. 1992a. ‘Scientific revolutions as convolutions? A sceptical enquiry’, in S. S. Demidov, M. Folkerts, D. E. Rowe, and C. J. Scriba (eds.),Amphora. Festschrift fur Hans Wussing zu seinem 65. Geburtstag, Basel: Birkhäuser, 279–287.
Grattan-Guinness, I. 1992b. ‘Structure-similarity as a cornerstone of the philosophy of mathematics’, in J. Echeverria, A. Ibarra, and T. Mormann (eds.),The space of mathematics. Philosophical, epistemological, and historical explorations, Berlin, New York: de Gruyter, 91–111.
Grattan-Guinness, I. 1994. (ed.),Companion encyclopaedia of the history and philosophy of the mathematical sciences, London: Routledge. [Repr. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2003.].
Grattan-Guinness, I. 2004. ‘The mathematics of the past. Distinguishing its history from our heritage’,Historia mathematica, 31, 161–185.
Grattan-Guinness, I. 2007. ‘Equilibrium in mechanics and then in economics, 1860–1920: a good source for analogies?’, in Mosini [2007], 17–44.
Grattan-Guinness, I. 2008a. ‘Differential equations and linearity in the 19th and early 20th centuries’,Archives internationales d’histoire des sciences, to appear.
Grattan-Guinness, I. 2008b. ‘On the early work of William Thomson: mathematical physics and methodology in the 1840s’, in R. G. Flood, M. McCartney, A. Whitaker (eds.),Lord Kelvin: life, labours and legacy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 44–55, 314–316.
Grattan-Guinness, I. with the collaboration of Ravetz, J. R. 1972.Joseph Fourier 1768–1830. A survey of his life and work, based on a critical edition of his monograph on the propagation of heat, presented to the Institut de France in 1807, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Hamming, R. 1980. ‘The unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics’,The American mathematical monthly, 87, 81–90.
Hawkins, T. W. 1975. ‘Cauchy and the spectral theory of matrices’,Historia mathematica, 2, 1–29.
Henshaw, J. M. 2006.Does measurement measure up?How numbers reveal and conceal the truth, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Hermann, A. 1971.The genesis of quantum theory, Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.
Hintikka, J. 2007.Socratic epistemology, Cambridge; Cambridge University Press.
Holland, J. R. 1975.Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. An introductory analysis with applications to biology, control and artificial intelligence, Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
Kaushal, R. S. 2003.Structural analogies in understanding nature, New Delhi: Anamaya.
Kiesow, H. 1960. Review of Wigner [1960],Zentralblatt für Mathematik 102, 7.
Knobloch, E. 2000. ‘Analogy and the growth of mathematical knowledge’, in E. Grosholz, H. Breger (eds.),The growth of mathematical knowledge, Dordrecht: Kluwer, 295–314.
Lesk, A. 2000. ‘The unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in mo-lecular biology’,The Mathematical Intelligencer 22, no. 2, 28–36.
Lesk, A. 2001. ‘Compared with what?’,The Mathematical Intelligencer, 23, no. 1, 4.
Mackey, G. W. 1978. ‘Harmonic analysis as the exploitation of symmetry: A historical survey’,Rice University Studies 64, 73–228. [Repr. in [1992], 1–158.]
Mackey, G. W. 1985. ‘Herman Weyl and the application of group theory to quantum mechanics’, in W. Deppert et al. (eds.),Exact sciences and their philosophical foundations, Kiel: Peter Lang, 131–159. [Repr. in [1992], 159–188.]
Mackey, G. W. 1992.The scope and history of commutative and noncommutative harmonic analysis, American Mathematical Society and London Mathematical Society.
Mathematics 1986. ‘Mathematics: the unifying thread in science’,Notices of the American Mathematical Society 33, 716–733.
Matte Blanco, L. 1975.The unconscious as infinite sets: an essay in bi-logic, London: Duckworth.
Medawar, P. B. 1967.The art of the soluble, Harmondsworth: Pelican.
Mosini, V. (ed.). 2007.Equilibrium in economics: scope and limits, London: Routledge.
Poisson, S. D. 1823. ‘Sur la distribution de la chaleur dans un anneau homogène et d’une èpaisseur constante... ’,Connaissance des temps (1826), 248–257.
Pólya, G. 1954a, 1954b.Mathematics and plausible reasoning, 2 vols., 1st ed., Princeton: Princeton University Press. [2nd ed. 1968.]
Pólya, G. 1963.Mathematical methods in science, Washington: MAA.
Popper, K. R. 1959.The logic of scientific discovery, London: Hutchinson.
Popper, K. R. 1972.Objective knowledge, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Roche, J. J. 1998.The mathematics of measurement. A critical history, London: Athlone Press.
Ruelle, D. 1988. ‘Is our mathematics natural? The case of equilibrium statistical mechanics’,Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 19, 259–267.
Sarukkai, S. 2005. ‘Revisiting the “unreasonable effectiveness” of mathematics’,Current science, 88, 415–422.
Schwartz, J. 1962. ‘The pernicious influence of mathematics on science’, in E. Nagel et al. (eds.),Logic, methodology and philosophy of science, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 356–360. [Repr. in R. Hersh (ed.),18 unconventional essays on the nature of mathematics, New York: Springer, 2005, 231–235.]
Smith, B. (ed.). 1982.Parts and moments. Studies in logic and formal ontology, Munich: Philosophia.
Smithies, F. 1997.Cauchy and the creation of complex function theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Steiner, M. 1998.The applicability of mathematics as a philosophical problem, Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.
Tanner, R. C. H. 1961. ‘Mathematics begins with inequality’,Mathematical Gazette 44, 292–294.
Thompson, S. P. 1910.Calculus made easy, 1st ed., London: Macmillans. [Deservedly numerous later eds.].
Toeplitz, O. 1963.The calculus. A genetic approach, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. [German original 1949.].
Velupillai, K. V. 2005. ‘The unreasonable ineffectiveness of mathematics in economics’,Cambridge Journal of Economics 29, 849–872.
West, B. J. 1985.An essay on the importance of being nonlinear, Berlin: Springer.
Weyl, H. 1949.Philosophy of mathematics and natural science, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Weyl, H. 1952.Symmetry, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Whittaker, E. T. 1927.Analytical dynamics, 3rd ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wigner, E. P. 1931.Gruppentheorie und ihre Anwendung auf die Quantenmechanik tier Atomspektren, Braunschweig: Vieweg. [Rev. English trans.:Group theory and its application to the quantum mechanics of atomic spectra, New York: Academic Press, 1959.].
Wigner, E. P. 1960. ‘The unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in the natural sciences’,Communications on pure and applied mathematics, 13, 1–14. [Repr. in [1967], 222–237; and inPhilosophical reflections and syntheses (ed. G. Emch), Berlin: Springer, 1995, 534–548.]
Wigner, E. P. 1967.Symmetries and reflections: scientific essays, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Wilson, C. A. 1980a, 1980b. ‘Perturbation and solar tables from Lacaille to Delambre: the rapprochement of observation with theory’,Archive for history of exact sciences 22, 53–188, 189–304.
Wolf, C. J. E. 1889–1891.Mémoires sur le pendule. . ., 2 pts., Paris: Gauthier-Villars.
Wussing H. 1984.The genesis of the abstract group concept, Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Grattan-Guinness, I. Solving wigner’s mystery: The reasonable (though perhaps limited) effectiveness of mathematics in the natural sciences. The Mathematical Intelligencer 30, 7–17 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02985373
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02985373