Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Environmental influence and transplant experiments

  • Published:
The Botanical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  1. Allan, H. H. Epharmonic response in certain New Zealand species, and its bearing on taxonomic questions. Jour. Ecol.14: 72–91. 1926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Babcock, E. B. Cyto-genetics and the species concept. Amer. Nat.65: 5–18, 1931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Babcock, E. B., and Stebbins, G. L., Jr. The American species ofCrepis. Carnegie Inst. of Wash. Publ. No. 504. 199pp. 1938.

  4. Baur, Erwin. Einführung in die experimentelle Vererbungslehre. 2nd ed., 401 pp. 1914.

  5. Blakeslee, Albert F., The present and potential service of chemistry to plant breeding. Amer. Jour. Bot.26: 163–172. 1939.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bonner, James. The rôle of vitamins in plant development. Bot. Rev.3: 616–640. 1937.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bonnier, Gaston. Cultures expérimentales dans les alpes et les Pyrénées. Rev. Gén. Bot2: 513–546. 1890.

    Google Scholar 

  8. —. Recherches expérimentales sur l’adaptation des plantes au climat alpin. Ann. Sci. Nat., Bot. VII.20: 217–358. 1895.

    Google Scholar 

  9. —. Nouvelles observations sur les cultures expérimentales à diverses altitudes. Rev. Gén. Bot.32: 305–326. 1920.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bouget, Joseph. Les différentes modes d’adaptation à l’altitude duPoa annua. Rev. Gén. Bot.40: 321–327. 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bright, D. N. E., The effects of exposure upon the structure of certain heath-plants. Jour. Ecol.16: 323–365. 1928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bruman, A. J. Genetic aspects of plant introduction. An approach to the heredity-environment problem in plants. Sci. Monthly46: 120–131. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Buch, Hans. Die Scapanien Nordeuropas und Sibiriens. Pt. II. Soc. Scient. Fennica, Commentationes Biol.3: 1–173. 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Buch, Hans. Eine neue moossystematische Methodik nebst einigen ihrer Resultate und ein neues Nomenklatursystem. Beretn. om det 18. Skandinaviske Naturforskermöde. Copenhagen. pp. 225–229. 1929.

  15. —. Vorarbeiten zu einer Lebermoosflora Fenno-Skandias. III: Die GattungCalypogeia Raddi. Mem. Soc. Fauna et Flora Fennica11: 197–214. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bullock, Dolores.Atriplex semibaccata as influenced by certain environmental conditions. Ecology17: 263–269. 1936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Christie, W., andGran, H. H., Die Einwirkung verschiedener Klimaverhältnisse auf reine Linien von Hafer und Gerste. Hereditas8: 207–228. 1926.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Clausen, Jens, Studies on the collective speciesViola tricolor. Bot. Tids.37: 363–416, 1922.

    Google Scholar 

  19. —. Genetical and cytological investigations onViola tricolor L. andV. arvensis Murr. Hereditas8: 1–156. 1926.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Clausen, Jens., Keck, David D. and Hiesey, William M. Experimental studies on the nature of species. I. Effect of varied environments on Western North American plants. Carnegie Inst. Wash. Publ. No. 520. 1940.

  21. —— and — The concept of species based on experiment. Amer. Jour. Bot.26: 103–106. 1939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Clements, Frederic E. An ecologic view of the species conception. Amer. Nat.42: 253–281. 1908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. — Experimental methods in adaptation and morphogeny. Jour. Ecol.17: 357–379. 1929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. —, and Associates. Ecology. Carnegie Inst. Wash. Year Books Nos.17: 292–293;18 334–335;19: 345–347;20: 395–398;21: 346;22: 308;23: 256–259;24: 314–315;25: 335–339;26: 305–309;27: 188–189;28: 196–197;29: 232–234;30: 268–270;31: 212–213;32; 201–203;33: 189–192;34: 211–213;35: 221–223;36: 222–224;37: 229–233. 1918–1938.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Cockayne, L. Observations concerning evolution, derived from ecological studies in New Zealand. Trans. New Zealand Inst.44: 1–50. 1912.

    Google Scholar 

  26. —, andAllan, H. H. The bearing of ecological studies in New Zealand on botanical taxonomic conceptions and procedure. Jour. Ecol.15: 234–277. 1927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Cockerell, T. D. What is a binomial? What is a forma? Torreya34: 42. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Davy de Virville, Adrien L’action du milieu sur les mousses. Rev. Gén. Bot.39: 364–383; 449–452; 515–522; 560–586; 638–662; 711–726; 767–782.40: 30–44; 95–110; 156–171. 1927–1928.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Du Rietz, G. Einar, The fundamental units of biological taxonomy. Sv. Bot. Tidskr.24: 333–428. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Eigsti, O. J. A cytological study of colchicine effects in the induction of polyploidy in plants. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. Wash.24: 56–63. 1938.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Evans, Morgan W. Relation of latitude to certain phases of the growth of timothy. Amer. Jour. Bot.26: 212–218. 1939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Garner, W. W. Recent work on photoperiodism. Bot. Rev.3: 259–275. 1937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Glück, Hugo. Biologische und morphologische Untersuchungen über Wasser und Sumpfgewächse, Teil I, 312 pp., 1905; II, 256 pp., 1906; III, 644 pp., 1911; IV, 746 pp., 1924.

  34. Goodspeed, T. H., andUber, Fred M. Radiation and plant cytogenetics. Bot. Rev.5: 1–48. 1939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Gravis, A. Contribution à l’étude des variations. Naisme et pédocarpisme duPlantago Coronopus L. Suppléments au Bull. Biol. de France et Belgique No. 14, p. 1–94. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Greenleaf, W. H. Induction of polyploidy inNicotiana by heteroauxin treatment. Jour. Hered.29: 451–464. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Gregor, J. W. Experiments on the genetics of wild populations. I.Plantago maritima. Jour. Genetics22: 15–25. 1930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. — Experimental delimitation of species. New Phyt.,30: 204–217. 1931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. — The ecotype concept in relation to the registration of crop plants. Ann. Appl. Biol.20: 205–219. 1933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. —,Davey, V. McM., andLang, J. M. S. Experimental taxonomy. I. Experimental garden technique in relation to the recognition of the smaller taxonomic units. New Phytol.35: 323–350. 1936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. —, andSansome, F. W. Experiments on the genetics of wild populations. Part I. Grasses. Jour. Genetics17: 349–364. 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Hagem, Oscar. Forsøk med vestamerikanske traeslag. Meddelelser f. Vestlandets Forstlige Forsøksstation4: 1–217. 1931. (With German Summary).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Hall, H. M. The taxonomic treatment of units smaller than species. Proc. Int. Congr. Pl. Sci., Ithaca, N.Y.2: 1461–1468. 1926.

    Google Scholar 

  44. — Heredity and enviroment—as illustrated by transplant studies. Sci. Monthly35: 289–302. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Jepson, W. L. Flora of California,1(5): 564–572. 1922.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Jones, D. F., andHuntington, E. The adaptation of corn to climate. Jour. Amer. Soc. Agron.27: 261–270. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Jordan, Alexis. Diagnoses d’espèces nouvelles ou méconnues, etc. Vol. 1, pt. 1. 355 pp. 1864.

  48. Jordan, Alexis. Remarques sur le fait de l’existence en société à l’état sauvage des espèces végétales affinés, etc. Cong. Assoc. Fr., 2. 1873.

  49. Kempff, Gehard. Non-indigenous western yellow pine plantations in northern Idaho. Northwest Sci.2: 54–58. 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Kerner von Marilaun, Anton. Pflanzenleben. Vol. 2, p. 489–507. 1891.

    Google Scholar 

  51. —, andOliver, F. W. The natural history of plants. Vol.2, p. 497–514. 1895.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Kuleshov, N. N. World’s diversity of phenotypes of maize. Jour. Amer. Soc. Agron.25: 688–700. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Langlet, Olof. Studien über die physiologische Variabilität der Kiefer und deren Zusammenhang mit dem Klima. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Ökotypen vonPinus silvestris L. Meddel. från Statens Skogsförsöksanstalt29: 219–470. 1936. (Swedish with German summary.)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Larsen, C. Syrach. The employment of species, types, and individuals in forestry. Royal Vet. and Agric. College, Copenhagen. Yearbook, pp. 3–154. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Lemperg, Fritz. Studies in the perennial species of the genusDianthus L. I. Meddelanden från Göteborgs Bot. Trägård11: 71–134. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Lesage, Pierre. Sur la précocité provoquée et héritée dans leLepidium sativum après la vie sous chassis. Rev. Gén. Bot.38: 65–85. 1926.

    Google Scholar 

  57. —. Suite des recherches sur l’hérédité du caractère physiologique acquis: la précocité. Comptes Rend. Acad. Sci.207: 741–743. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Loehwing, Walter F. Physiological aspects of sex in angiosperms. Bot. Rev.4: 581–625. 1938.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. MacDougal, D. T. Organic response. Am. Nat.45: 5–40. 1911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. — The determinative action of environic factors uponNeobeckia aquatica Greene. Flora106: 265–280. 1914.

    Google Scholar 

  61. — The reactions of plants to new habitats. Ecology2: 1–20. 1921.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Maleyev, V. P. Theoretical basis of plant acclimatization. Suppl. 60, Bull. Appl. Bot., Leningrad. 168 pp. 1933. Plant Breeding Abstracts4, Abst. No. 99, 1934.

  63. Marsden-Jones, Eric M., andTurrill, W. B. Transplant experiments of the British Ecological Society at Potterne, Wiltshire. Summary of results, 1928–1937. Jour. Ecology26: 380–389. 1938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Massart, J. L’accomodation individuelle chez lePolygonum amphibium. Bull. Jard. Bot. Etat à Brussels1: 73–95. 1902.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Miège, E. L’influence du milieu sur la stabilité des espèces élémentaires d’Hordeum. Ann. Sciences Nat., Bot. X.18: 106–109. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Münch, E. Standortrassen der Waldbäume. Ber. Deut. Bot. Ges. (Generalversammlungsheft)55: 63–72. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Nägeli, C. Mechanisch-physiologische Theorie der Abstammungslehre. 822 pp. 1884.

  68. Nannfeldt, J. A. Taxonomical and plant-geographical studies in thePoa laxa group. Symbolae Botanicae Upsalienses1: 1–105. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Nawaschin, M. Altern der Samen als Ursache von Chromosomenmutationen. Planta20: 233–243. 1933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Nebel, B. R., andRuttle, M. L. The cytological and genetical significance of colchicine. Jour. Hered.29: 3–9. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Peto, F. H. Genetical studies on mutants in the progeny of heattreated barley. Canad. Jour. Res.15: 217–229. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Setchell, W. A.Ruppia and its environmental factors. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.10: 286–288. 1924.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Sinskaya, E. N. New tendencies in plant breeding. Lenin Acad. Agr. Sci., 56 pp. 1937.

  74. Stapledon, R. G. Cocksfoot grass (Dactylis glomerata L.) ecotypes in relation to the biotic factor. Jour. Ecol.16: 71–104. 1928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Turesson, Göte. The genotypical response of the plant species to the habitat. Hereditas3: 211–350. 1922.

    Google Scholar 

  76. — Scope and import of genecology. Hereditas4: 171–176. 1923.

    Google Scholar 

  77. — The plant species in relation to habitat and climate. Hereditas6: 147–236. 1925.

    Google Scholar 

  78. — Zur Natur und Begrenzung der Arteinheiten. Hereditas7: 323–334. 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  79. — The selective effect of climate upon plant species. Hereditas14: 100–152. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  80. — The geographical distribution of the alpine ecotype of some Eurasiatic plants. Hereditas15: 329–346. 1931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Turrill, W. B. The expansion of taxonomy with special reference to Spermatophyta. Biol. Rev.13: 342–373. 1938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Vavilov, N. I. Studies on the origin of cultivated plants. Institut de botanique appliquée et d’amélioration des plantes. 248 pp. 1926.

  83. Vavilov, N. I. Wild progenitors of the fruit trees of Turkestan and the Caucasus and the problem of the origin of fruit trees. Proc. Ninth Int. Hort. Cong., London, 1930, p. 271–286. 1931.

  84. — General principles for the introduction of new plants into the Soviet subtropics. Soviet Subtropics No. 6, p. 3–18. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  85. —, andJakushkina, O. A contribution to the phylogenesis of wheat and the inter-species hybridisation in wheats. Bull. Appl. Bot. & Pl. Breed.15: 1–159. 1925.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Wells, B. W., andShunk, I. V. Salt Spray: An important factor in coastal ecology. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club65: 485–492. 1938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Went, F. W., and Thimann, K. V. Phytohormones. 294 pp. 1937.

  88. Whyte, R. O., and Hudson, P. S. Vernalization or Lysenko’s method for the pre-treatment of seed. Imp. Bur. Pl. Genet. Bull. No. 9. 27 pp. 1933.

  89. Wolf, Carl B. Observations onBaccharis pilularis DC. Occasional Papers, Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden (Santa Ana, Calif.), Ser. 1, No. 1, pp. 17–29. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Division of Plant Biology, Stanford University, Calif.

    William M. Hiesey

Authors
  1. William M. Hiesey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hiesey, W.M. Environmental influence and transplant experiments. Bot. Rev 6, 181–203 (1940). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02882482

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02882482

Keywords

Search

Navigation