Skip to main content
Log in

The races of maize: III. choices of appropriate characters for racial classification

  • Published:
Economic Botany Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Analyses of variance for 111 characters from 55 races and subraces of maize from eastern South America grown at Piracicaba, S. P., Brazil, between 1960 and 1965, indicated that those characters which were least affected by environmental factors and interactions were reproductive characters. In particular, the component of variance due to differences among races for certain ear and kernel characters was greater than the sum of the corresponding components due to differences among years and race by year interactions. The converse was true for all vegetative characters. Tassel characters tended to be intermediate between ear and plant characters.

While some indices had larger components of variance attributable to racial differences than to the effects of environment and/or environmental interaction, some commonly used ones, such as cob/rachis and rachilla/kernel indices, proved to be quite susceptible to environmental influences. Again, indices based upon solely vegetative characters were consistently influenced more strongly by environmental factors and interaction than were those based on reproductive characters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  1. Abou-El-Fittouh, H. A., J. O. Rawlings, and P. A. Miller. 1969. Classification of environments to control genotype by environment interactions with an application to cotton. Crop Science9: 135–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Brieger, F. G., J. T. A. Gurgel, E. Paterniani, A. Blumenschein, and M. R. Alleoni. 1958. Races of maize in Brazil and other eastern South American countries. National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council Publ. 593. Washington, D. C. 283 p.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brown, W. L. 1960. Races of maize in the West Indies. National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council Publ. 792. Washington, D. C. 60 p.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Comstock, R. E., and R. H. Moll. 1963. Genotype-environment interactions. Pp. 164–196in W. D. Hanson and H. F. Robinson (eds.), Statistical genetics and plant breeding. National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council Publ. 982.Washington, D. C. 614 p.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Edwards, R. J. 1966. Comparisons of methods and procedures for intraspecific classification ofZea mays L. Ph.D. thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana. 100 P.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ferris, J. S. 1966. Estimation of conservatism of characters by constancy within biological populations. Evolution20: 587–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Goodman, M. M. 1967. The races of maize: I. The use of Mahalanobis’ generalized distances to measure morphological similarity. Fitotecnia Latinoamericana4: 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Goodman, M. M. 1969. Measuring evolutionary divergence. Jap. Jour, of Genet. In press.

  9. Huether, C. A., {jrJr.} 1968. Exposure of natural genetic variability underlying the pentamerous corolla constancy inLinanthus androsaceus ssp.androsaceus. Genetics60: 123–146.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mangelsdorf, P. C., R. S. MacNeish, and W. C. Galinat. 1964. Domestication of corn. Science143: 538–545.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Margulis, L., and T. N. Margulis. 1968. A note on the equivalence of characters: pheneticist vs. phylogeneticist. Systematic Zoology17: 477–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Morishima, H., H. I. Oka, and T. T. Chang. 1967. Analysis of genetic variations in plant type of rice. 2. Seasonal change in genetic plant type. Jap. Jour. Breeding17: 251–261.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Paterniani, E. 1967. Banco de germoplasma de milho. Racas de milho. Relatorio Cientifico de 1967, pp. 48, 59-70. Cadeira de Citologia e Genética, Escola Superior de Agricultura “Luiz de Queiroz,” Piracicaba, S. P., Brazil. 117 p.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Roberts, L. M., U. J. Grant, R. Ramirez E., W. H. Hatheway, and D. L. Smith. 1957. Races of maize in Columbia. National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council Publ. 510. Washington, D. C. 153 p.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sokal, R. R., and P. H. A. Sneath. 1963. Principals of numerical taxonomy. W. H. Freeman and Company,San Francisco. 359 p.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wellhausen, E. J., L. M. Roberts, and E.Hernandez X. 1952. Races of maize in Mexico. The Bussey Institution of Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts. 223 p.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Paper No. 2823 of the Journal Series of the North Carolina State University Agricultural Experiment Station, Raleigh, North Carolina. This investigation was supported in part by Public Health Service Grant GM 11546.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Goodman, M.M., Paterniani, E. The races of maize: III. choices of appropriate characters for racial classification. Econ Bot 23, 265–273 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02860459

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02860459

Keywords

Navigation