Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Reproductive health: An international perspective

  • Symposium: Behavioural Pediatrics — I
  • Published:
The Indian Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The twentieth century began with approximately 1.6 billion human beings in the world and, with an increase of 96 million people per year, will end with over 6 billion people. Unless this trend is directly confronted by the world governments and their citizens, there will be nearly 8 billion by 2025 and over 11 billion by 2050. Thus, reproductive health is and will remain an issue of critical importance for all countries to realize and study. Part of this trend is because of the many pregnancies which occur in adolescents around the world. A number of issues have developed this century contributing to the many pregnant teenagers. For example, India has one of the world's largest populations of teenagers-over 23 million, representing over 26% of the total in the world. Effective methods for contraception and sexually transmitted diseases prevention are available, but not to all sexually active humans. However, many barriers to effective contraception exist around the globe. This article discusses some of them and also reviews use of contraceptive methods in various countries. These include oral contraceptives, emergency contraceptive, injectable and implantable contraceptives, intrauterine devices, barrier contraceptives and others. Reproductive health remains a critical, universal issue for all humans in the world. We all must examine the many pitfalls to controlling the world's populations, including lack of sex education, limited access to effective contraceptives, and others. We cannot afford to let the population continue unchecked. Effective strategies are needed at this time; otherwise, the population will continue to run out of control, negatively damaging the world for the coming generations. There is need to leave a positive, and not negative legacy for the next generation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Argina H and Lukman HY. Norplant implants in Ethiopia.East Afr Med J 1997; 74 (4): 258–62.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Senanayake P. Sexual and reproductive health rights: The IPPF perspective. Keynote Address: African Regional Council Seminar on Sexual and Reproductive Health. Benin. June 24, 1996.

  3. Sharma V, Sharma A. L'approche par boite aux lettres: Un modele d'education sexuelle dans une societe traditionelle.Rev Med Suisse Romande 1995; 114: 1075–8.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kapadia KM. Marriage and family in India. Bombay, India, Orient Books, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gupta M. Sexuality in the Indian subcontinent.Sex Marital Ther 1994; 9: 57–69.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bhatia MS and Malik SC. Ohat syndrome: A useful diagnostic entity in Indian culture.Br J Psychiatr 1991; 159: 691–5.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Panos Institute of Asia: Point of no return?World AIDS 1991; 17: 5–8.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Government of India. Health Information of India. Census Bureau of Health intelligence, Directorate General of Health Services, New Delhi, India, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ross JA, Mauldin WP, Miller VC. Family planning and population: A compendium of international studies. New York, NY: The Population Council, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  10. International Planned Parenthood Federation: Developing a Sexual and Reproductive Health Programme for young people. Report of a workshop of South Asia Region. Bureau of family planning association of India. London, England: Internation Planned Parenthood Federation, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sharma V and Sharma A. Adolescent boys in Gujarat, India: Their acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and other sexually transmitted diseases.J Develop and Behav Pediatr 1997; 18 (6): 399–404.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hofmann AD. Adolescent growth and development In: AD Hofmann and DE Greydanus (eds)Adolescent Medicine 3rd edn. Stamford, CT: Appleton and Lange. 1997; 10–12.

    Google Scholar 

  13. International Planned Parenthood Federation. Adolescent Sexuality. A Special Report. London, England, IPPF, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Brody EB, Ottey F and LaGrande J. Early sex education in relationship to later coital and reproductive behaviour: Evidence from Jamaican women.Am J Psychiatr 1997; 133: 969–72.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tsui AO, Wasserheit JN and Haaga JG (eds).Reproductive Health in Developing Countries: Expanding Dimensions, Building Solutions. National Academy Press, Washington DC. 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Toubia N. Female circumcision as a public health issue.N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 712–16.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Omer-Hashi KH. Female genital mutilation: Perpectives from a Somalian midwife.Birth 1994; 21: 224–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Abdalla R.Sister in Affliction: Circumcision and Infibulation in women in Africa Zed. Press: London, England, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Dirie MA and Lindmark G. Female circumcision in Somalia and women's motives.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1991; 70: 581–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kosunen EA-L, Rimpela AH and Rimpela MK. Sixteen-year old contraceptive users in Finland, 1981–1993.Scand J Med 1995; 23 (4): 236–41.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Persson E, Sandstrom B and Jarlbro G. Sources of information, experiences and opinions in sexuality, contraception and sexually transmitted disease protection among Swedish studies.Adv Contraception 1992; 8: 41–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Phai N, Knodel J, Van Cam MEet al. Fertility and family planning in Vietnam: Evidence from the 1994 demographic survey.Stud Fam Plann 1996; 27 (1): 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hatcher R,et al. Contraceptive Technology 17 edn. NY: Irvington Publishers, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Riphagen FE and Ketting E. Comparative overview of results from eight surveys on contraceptive behaviour. In: E Ketting (ed).Contraception in Western Europe: A Current Appraisal. Carnfort Parthenon Publishing Group 1990; 77–110.

  25. Robey B, Rutstein SO, Morris L and Blackburn R. The reproductive revolution: New Survey findings.Pop Rep Series M. No. 11. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University. Population Information Programme 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Oddens BJ. Evaluation of the effect of contraceptive prices on demand in eight Western European countries.Adv Contraception 1993; 9: 1–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Moreno L, Goldman N. Rates in developing countries: Evidence from demographic and health surveys.Internal Fam Plann Perspect 1991; 17 (2): 44–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Moreno L and Goldman N. Contraceptive failure in developing countries.Fertil Control Rev 1992; 1 (2): 11–5.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Janowitz B, Suazo M, Fried OBet al. Impact of social marketing on contraceptive prevalence in Honduras.Stud Fam Plann 1992; 23 (2): 110–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Black TRL and Harvey PD. A report on a contraceptive social marketing experiment in rural Kenya.Stud Fam Plann 1976; 7 (4): 101–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Omran AR and Roudi F. The middle east poulation puzzle.Pop Bull 1993; 48 (1): 1–40.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Trottier DA, Potter LS, Taylor BAet al. User characteristics and oral contraceptive compliance in Egypt.Stud Fam Plann 1994; 25 (5): 284–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Emans SJ, Grace E, Woods ERet al. Adolescents' compliance with the use of oral contraceptives.JAMA 1987; 257 (3): 3377–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Egarter C, Strohmer H, Lehner Ret al. Contraceptive knowledge and attitudes of Austrian adolescents after mass media reports linking third generation oral contraceptives with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism.Contraception 1997; 56: 147–152.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Oddens BJ, Visser AP, Vemer HMet al. Contraceptive use and attitude in Great Britain.Contraception 1994; 49: 73–86.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Ketting E, Visser AP, Uzel Ret al. Oral contraceptives in the former Czech and Slovak Federal Republic: Attitudes and use.Adv Contracep 1993; 9: 141–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Oddens BJ, Arnold HT and Van Marit MGM. The dynamics of oral contracep-tive use in the Netherlands. 1990–1993.Adv Contracep 1994; 10: 167–174.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Serfaty D. Oral contraception compliance during adolescence.Ann NY Acad Sciencies 1991; 42: 422–431.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Davies J, Mitra SN and Schellstedi UP. Oral contraceptives in Bangladesh: Social marketing and the importance of husbands.Stud Fam Plann 1987; 18 (3): 157–168.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Ezeh AC. The influence of spouses over each other's contraceptive atttiudes in Ghana.Stud Fam Plann 1993; 24 (3): 163–174.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Terefe A and Larson CP. Modern contraceptive use in Ethiopia: Does involving husbands make a difference?Am J Publ Hth 1993; 83 (11): 1567–71.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Siassi I. The psychiatrist's role in family planning.Am J Psychiatr 1972; 129 (1): 80–5.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Oddens BJ. Contraceptive use and attitudes in Italy, 1993.Human Reproduction 1996; 11 (3): 533–39.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Huezo C and Malhotra U. Choice and use continuation of method of contraception: A multicenter study. International Planned Parenthood Federation, London, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Rimpelä AH, Rimpelä MK, Kogumen EAL. Use of oral contraceptives by adolescents and its consequences in Finland, 1981–1991.Br Med J 1992; 305: 1053–7.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Martin RM, Hilton SR and Kerry SM. The impact of the October pill scare on oral contraceptive use in the United Kingdom: Analysis of a general practice automated database.Fam Pract 1997; 14: 279–84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Koenig MA, Hossain MB and Whittaker M. The influence of quality of care upon contraceptive use in rural Bangladesh.Stud Fam Plann 1997; 28 (4): 278–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Rosenberg MJ, Waugh MS and Barnhill MS. Compliance, counselling and satisfaction with oral contraceptives: A prospective evaluation.Fam Plann Perspect 1998; 30 (2): 89–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Peterson LS, Oakley D, Potter LSet al. Women's efforts to prevent pregnancy: Consistency of oral contraceptive use.Fam Plann Perspect 1988; 30 (1): 19–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Van Look PFA, Von Hertzer H. Emergency contraception.Br Med Bull 1994; 49: 158–70.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Rogala C, Anzen B. Late start for emergency contraception in Sweden.Plann Parenthood Europe 1995; 24: 15–17.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Smith BH, Gurney EM, Aboulela Let al. Emergency contraception: A survey of women's knowledge and attitudes.Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996; 103: 1109–16.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Graham A, Green L, Glasier AF. Teenager's knowledge of emergency contraceptives: Questionnaire survey in Southeast Scotland.Br Med J 1996; 312: 1567–69.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Pyett PM. Postcoital contraception: Who uses the ‘morning after pill’.Aust NZJ Obstet Gynaecol 1996; 36 (3) 347–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Kosunen E, Sihvo S and Hemminki E. Knowledge and use of hormonal emergency contraception in Finland.Contraception 1997; 55: 153–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Fraser IS and Dennerstein GJ. Depo-Provera in an Australian metropolitan practice.Med J Aust 1994; 160 (2): 553–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Polaneczky M, Slap G, Forke Cet al. The use of levonorgestrel implants (Norplant) for contraception in adolescent mothers.N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 1201–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Amatya R, Akhter H, McMahan Jet al. The effect of husband counselling on Norplant contraceptive acceptability in Bangladesh.Contraception 1994; 50: 263–73.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Davie JE, Walling MR, Masour DJet al. Impact of patient counselling on acceptance of the levonoregestrel implant contraceptive in the United Kingdom.Clin Therapeutic 1996; 18 (1): 150–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Lei Z-W, Wu SC, Garceau RJet al. Effect of pretreatment counselling on discontinuation rates in Chinese women given Depomedroxyprogesterone acetate for contraception.Contraception 1996; 53: 357–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Ruminjo JK, Achwal I and Ruminjo IN. Acceptability of Norplant contraceptive subdermal implants in Kenya.East Afr Med J 1994; 71 (9): 558–61.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Fakeye O. Contraception with subdermal levonorgestrel implants as an alternative to surgical contraception at Ilorin, Nigeria,Int. J Gynecol Obstet 1991; 35: 331–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Harel Z, Biro FM, Kollar Eet al. Adolescent's reasons for and experience after discontinuation of the long-term contraceptives Depo-Provera and Norplant.J Adolesc Health 1996; 19: 118–123.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Vekeman SM, Delvigne A and Paesmans M. Continuation rates with a levonogrestrel-releasing contraceptive implant Norplant. A prospective study in Belgium.Contraception 1997; 56: 291–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Chompootaweep S, Kochagarn E, Sirisumpan Set al. Effect of Norplant implant among Thai women in Bangkok.Contraception 1996; 53: 33–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Davie J, Hiremath K and Glasier A. The introduction of a new contraceptive: 2-years experience with Norplant.Health Bull 1996; 54(5): 314–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Singh K, Viegas OAC. A 3-year clinical evaluation of Norplant 2 rods in Singapore.Adv Contraception 1990; 6: 63–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Hall PE. The introduction of cyclofem into national family planning programmes: Experience from studies in Indonesia Jamaica, Mexico, Thailand and Tunisia.Contraception 1994; 49: 489–507.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Sivin I and Stern J. Health during prolonged used of levonorgestel 20μg/dl and copper TCu 380 Ag intrauterine contraceptive devices: A multicenter study.Fertil Steril 1994; 61 (1): 70–77.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Henshaw SK and Morrow E. Induced Abortion:A World View 1990 Supplement. The Alan Guttmacher Institute, New York, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Munday D, Francome C, Savage N. Twenty years of legal abortion.Br Med J 1989; 298: 1231–4.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Young LK, Fargubar CM, McCowan LMet al. The contraceptive practices of women seeking termination of pregnancy in an Auckland clinic.N Zealand Med J 1994; 107: 189–92.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Renne EP. The pregnancy that doesn't stay: The practice and perception of AB By Ekiti Yoruba womens.Soc. Sci Med 1996; 42 (4): 483–94.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Koonin LM. Abortion surveillance-United States, 1993 and 1994.Morb Mort Week Rep 1997; 46 (SS-4).

  75. Asamoah-Adu A, Weir S, Pappos Met al. Evaluation of a targeted AIDS prevention intervention to increase condom use among prostitutes in Ghana.AIDS 1994; 8:239–46.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Hira SK, Spruyt AB, Feldblum PTet al. Sperimicide acceptability among patients at a sexually transmitted disease clinic in Zambia.Am J Publ Health 1995; 85: 1098–1103.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Greydanus DE, and Lonchamp D. Contraception in the 1990s.Med Clin No Amer 1990; 74 (5): 1205–1224.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Kegeles SM, Adler NE and Irwin CE. Adolescents and condoms.Am J Dis Child 1989; 143: 911–15.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Brown RT and Cromer BA. The pediatrician and the sexually active adolescent.Pediatr Clin N Amer 1997; 44: 1379–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Persson E, Sandstrom B and Jarlbro G. Sources of information, experience and opinion on sexuality, contraception and sexually transmitted diseases protection among young swedish students.Adv Contraception 1992; 8: 41–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Larague D. Predictors of reported condom use in central Harlem youth as conceptualized by the health belief model.J Adolesc Health 1997; 21 (5): 318–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Schuster MA, Bell RM, Berry SHet al. Impact of a high school condom availability programme on sexual attitudes and behaviours.Fam Plann Perpsect 1998; 30 (2): 67–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Freziers RG, Walsh TL, Nelson ALet al. Breakage and acceptability of a polyurethane condom: A randomized, controlled study.Fam Plann Perspect 1998; 30 (2): 73–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. MSU/Kalamazoo Centre for Medical Studies, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, 1000 Oakland Drive, 49008, Kalamazoo, Michigan, USA

    Donald E. Greydanus

  2. International Planned Parenthood Federation Regent's College, Inner Circle, Regent's Park, NW1 4NS, London, England

    Pramilla Senanayake

  3. Adolescent Medicine, King-Drew Medical Centre, Los Angeles, California, USA

    Michelé J. Gains

Authors
  1. Donald E. Greydanus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pramilla Senanayake
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Michelé J. Gains
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Greydanus, D.E., Senanayake, P. & Gains, M.J. Reproductive health: An international perspective. Indian J Pediatr 66, 415–424 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02845536

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02845536

Key words

Search

Navigation