Skip to main content
Log in

Toward intelligent decision support for pharmaceutical product development

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Developing pharmaceutical product formulation in a timely manner and ensuring quality is a complex process that requires a systematic, science-based approach. Information from various categories, including properties of the drug substance and excipients, interactions between materials, unit operations, and equipment is gathered. Knowledge in different forms, including heuristics, decision trees, correlations, and first-principle models is applied. Decisions regarding processing routes, choice of excipients, and equipment sizing are made based on this information and knowledge. In this work, we report on the development of a software infrastructure to assist formulation scientists in managing the information, capturing the knowledge, and providing intelligent decision support for pharmaceutical product formulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yu, L.X.et al. (2004) Applications of process analytical technology to crystallization processes.Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 56, 349–369.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Rowe, R.C. and Roberts, R.J. (2002) Expert systems in pharmaceutical product development. InEncyclopedia of Pharmaceutical Technology (2nd edn), pp 1188–1210, Marcel-Dekker.

  3. Ramani, K.V.et al. (1992) An expert system for drug preformulation in a pharmaceutical company.Interfaces 22, 101–108.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rowe, R.C. and Colburn, E.A. (2000) Generating rules for tablet formulation.Pharmaceutical Technology International 12, 24–27.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rowe, R. (2000) The right formula.Chem. Ind. 24, 465–467.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Podczeck, F. (1992) Knowledge based system for the development of tablets.Proceedings of the 11th Pharmaceutical Technology Conference, 1, 240–264.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Skingle, B. (1990) An introduction to the PFES Project. InProceedings of the 10th International Workshop on Expert Systems and Their applications, pp 907–922.

  8. Wood, M. (1991) Expert systems save formulation time.Laboratory Equipment Digest, 17–19.

  9. Bateman, S.D.et al. (1996) The development and validation of a capsule formulation knowledge-based system.Pharmaceutical Technology 20, 174–184.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rowe, R.C.et al. (1998) Film coating formulation using an expert system.Pharm. Tech. Europe 10, 72–82.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Stricker, H.et al. (1994) The galenic development system Heidelberg/systematic development of dosage forms.Pharm. Ind. 56, 641–647.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rowe, R.C.et al. (1995) Expert system for parenteral development.PDA J. Pharm. Sci. Technol. 49, 257–261.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Frank, J.et al. (1997) Knowledge-based assistance for the development of drugs.IEEE Expert-Intelligent Systems & Their Applications 12, 40–48.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rowe, R.C. (1996) Applying neural computing to product formulation.Manufacturing Chemist 67, 21–23.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lai, S.et al. (1995) An expert system for the development of powder filled hard gelatin capsule formulations.Pharm. Res. 12, S150.

  16. Lai, S.et al. (1996) An expert system to aid the development of capsule formulations.Pharmaceutical Technology Europe 8, 60–68.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rowe, R.D.et al. (1999) Case-based reasoning — a new approach to tablet formulation.Pharmaceutical Technology Europe 11, 36–40.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Guo, M.et al. (2002) A prototype intelligent hybrid system for hard gelatin capsule formulation development.Pharmaceutical Technology, 9, 44–60.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hohne, B.A. and Houghton, R.D. (1986) An expert system for the formulation of agricultural chemicals. InArtificial Intelligence Applications in Chemistry, American Chemical Society, pp 87–97.

  20. Zhao, C.et al. (2005) Pharmaceutical informatics: a novel paradigm for pharmaceutical product development and manufacture.Proceedings of 15th European Symposium on Computer Aided Process Engineering, 1561–1566.

  21. Gruber, T.R. (1993) A translation approach to portable ontology specification.Knowledge Acquisition 5, 199–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Noy, N.F. and McGuinness, D.L. (2001) Ontology development 101: a guide to creating your first ontology.Stanford knowledge systems laboratory technical report KSL-01-05.

  23. Paszko, C. and Pugsley, C. (2000) Considerations in selecting a laboratory information management system (LIMS).Am. Lab. 9, 38–42.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Grauer, Z. (2003) Laboratory information management systems and traceability of quality systems.Am. Lab. 9, 15–18.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zall, M. (2001) The nascent paperless laboratory.Chemical Innovation 31, 15–21.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Pavlis, R. (2005) Why doesn’t a traditional electronic laboratory notebook work in a QA/QC lab?Scientific Computing & Instrumentation 22, 31–32.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Noga, M. and Kruper, F. (2002) Optimizing content management system pipelines.Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2487, 252–267.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Bicer, V.et al. (2005) Archetype-based semantic interoperability of Web service messages in the healthcare domain.Int. Journal of semantic and Web Information Systems 1, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Peleg, M.et al. (2004) Guideline interchange format 3.5 technical specification. InterMed Collaboratory.

  30. Farmer, W.M. (2004) MKM: a new interdisciplinary field of research.ACM SIGSAM Bull. 38, 47–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lachman, L. et al. (1986) Liquids. InThe Theory and Practice of Industrial Pharmacy, 3rd edn, Philadelphia, Lea & Febiger, p 461.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kunni, D. and Levenspiel, O. (1969) Design of Physical Operations. InFluidization Engineering, Wiley, pp 425–426.

  33. Marchiori, M. (2003) The Mathematical Semantic Web.Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2594, 216–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Caprotti, O.et al. (2004) Mathematics on the (Semantic) NET.Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3053, 213–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Rowe, R.C. (1993) Expert-systems in solid dosage development.Pharm. Ind. 55, 1040–1045.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Venkat Venkatasubramanian.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhao, C., Jain, A., Hailemariam, L. et al. Toward intelligent decision support for pharmaceutical product development. J Pharm Innov 1, 23–35 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02784878

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02784878

Keywords

Navigation