Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative study of intranasal midazolam and intravenous diazepam sedation for procedures and seizures

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The Indian Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of intranasal midazolam for seizures and various procedures.

Methods

Prospective randomized study. Total 125 children of all ages of either sex, for seizure episode (n-76) and various invasive and non-invasive procedures (n-49) received either intranasal midazolam (0.2 mg/Kg) or intravenous diazepam (0.3 mg/Kg).

Results

Mean time from arrival at hospital to starting treatment was significantly shorter in midazolam group compared to diazepam group [2.34±0.90; minute vs 4.61±1.08 minute p<0.001]. Mean time to control seizures after arrival in hospital was significantly shorter in midazolam group compared to diazepam group [5.25±0.86 minute vs 6.51±1.06 minute p<0.001].

Conclusion

Midazolam by the intranasal route provides safe and equally effective non-invasive method of sedation for procedures and seizures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Krauss Baruch, Steven M Green. Sedation and analgesia for procedures in children.New England J Med 2000; 342 (13): 938–945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gopinath PG, Gopinath G, Kumar TCA. Target site of intranasally sprayed substances and their transport across the nasal mucosa: a new insight into the intranasal route of drugdelivery.Curr Ther Res 1978; 23: 596–607.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kida S, Pantazis A, Weller RO. CSF Drains Directly from the Subarachnoid Space into Nasal Lymphatics in the Rat-Anatomy, Histology and Immunological Significance.J Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology 1993; 19: 480–488.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Latson Larry A, Chaetham JP, Gumbiner CH, Kingler JD, Danford DA, Hofschire PJ. Midazolam Nose Drops for Outpatients Echocardiographic Sedation in Infants.Am Heart J 1991; 121: 209.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wilton NCT, Leigh J, Rosen DR, Pandit U. Preanesthetic sedation of preschool children using intranasal midazolam.Anesthesiology 1988; 69: 972–975.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lahet ELi, Micheal G, Joseph B, Tzvi B, Matithyahu B. Comparison of intranasal Midazolam with intravenous Diazepam for treating febrile seizures in children-prospective randomized study.British Med J 2000; 321: 83–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Slover R, Schlesinger T. Use of intranasal midazolam in preschool children.Anaseth Analg 1990; 70: 51–54.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fishbein Mark, Lugo Ralph A woodland Jennifer, Lininger Barbara and Linscheid Tom. Evaluation of intranasal midazolam in children undergoing esophagogastroduodenoscopy.J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1997; 23(3): 261–266.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. K. Rawat.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mittal, P., Manohar, R. & Rawat, A.K. Comparative study of intranasal midazolam and intravenous diazepam sedation for procedures and seizures. Indian J Pediatr 73, 975–978 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02758299

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02758299

Key words

Navigation