Abstract
In Swedish welfare agencies, it was found that the importance of characteristics of social research for utilization was related to three intervening factors: the context of origin of the research, the functions for the user and the utilization context. These factors seem to explain the difference between competing notions on the importance of scientific sophistication for research utilization.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baklien, B. (1983). The use of social science in a Norwegian ministry: As a tool of policy or mode of thinking?Acta Sociologica, 26(1), 33–47.
Barton, A. (1981). Ode to an unused research report.Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 3(2), 141–142.
Caplan, N. (1979). The two-communities theory and knowledge utilization.American Behavioral Scientist, 22 459–470.
Kirk, S. (1979). Understanding research utilization in social work. In A. Rubin and A. Rosenblatt, (Eds.),CSWE sourcebook on research utilization. New York: Council of Social Work Education.
Larsen, J. (1980). Knowledge utilization: What is it?Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 1(3), 421–442.
Marin, B. (1981). What is half-knowledge sufficient for—and when?Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 3(1), 43–60.
Nilsson, K., & S. Sunesson (1988a).Konflikt, kontroll, expertis. Att anvanda social forskning. Lund Studies in Social Welfare Research, 1. Lund: Arkiv.
Nilsson, K., & S. Sunesson. (1988b).Conflict and control strategies of research utilization, Organization and utilization contexts. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Nowotny, H. (1982).Nutzliches Wissen—Verwertung sozialwissenschaftlicher Ergebnisse in Abhangigkeit wechslender Konfliktfelder. Mimeo, Berlin.
Stankiewicz, R. (1979).Social processes of utilization of scientific knowledge (Report No. 8). Oslo: Institute for Studies in Research and Higher Education.
Sunesson, S., & K. Nilsson. (1988)Explaining research utilization: Beyond functions. Unpublished manuscript.
Van de Vall, M., & C. Bolas. (1981). A paradigm of social policy research (SPR) in advanced social systems: An empirical analysis.Revue Internationale de Sociologie, 17(1), 93–111.
Webber, D. (1986). Explaining policy-makers' use of policy information.Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 7(2), 249–290.
Weiss, C.H., & M. Bucuvalas. (1977). The challenge of social research to decision marking. In C.H. Weiss (Ed.),Using social research in public policy making. Lexington, MA: Heath-Lexington.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Sune Sunesson is professor and head of the Ph.D. program and the research department of the School of Social Work at Lund University. His main research interests are the sociology of human service organizations and the impact of science on these organizations. Kjell Nilsson, Birgitta Ericson, and Britt-Marie Johansson are Ph.D. candidates in the Department of Sociology of the Lund University.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sunesson, S., Nilsson, K., Ericson, B. et al. Intervening factors in the utilization of social research. Knowledge in Society 2, 42–56 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02737074
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02737074